A Heggstad petition can be an important tool for beneficiaries and trustees looking to transfer assets that were intended to fund a trust but were never formally retitled. In Dinuba and throughout Tulare County, families rely on clear legal guidance to confirm trust ownership or to ask a court to recognize assets as belonging to a trust. This introduction explains when a Heggstad petition may arise, who typically files one, and what outcomes are commonly sought. For property intended to be held in trust, a Heggstad petition can streamline estate administration and reduce uncertainty about title, especially where a pour-over will or other trust documents indicate trust ownership but deeds or accounts were not updated.
Understanding the Heggstad petition process is essential for anyone dealing with a trust administration or a post-death transfer of assets in California. The petition asks the court to declare that particular property belonged to the decedent’s trust at the time of death, which can avoid the need for probate for those assets. This paragraph outlines the core goals of filing: clarifying ownership, enabling distribution according to the trust, and helping successor trustees access or transfer assets. While each case is unique, common situations include real property left in the decedent’s name or accounts that never reflected the trust as owner despite the trust language indicating otherwise.
A Heggstad petition can produce practical benefits during trust administration by formally recognizing assets as trust property, which reduces confusion and expedites distribution to beneficiaries. When deeds, titles, or account registrations were not updated to show trust ownership, a petition provides a judicial declaration aligning legal title with the settlor’s intent. This avoids contested probate for those assets and may reduce administrative delays and costs. For trustees and beneficiaries, having a court determination often facilitates smoother transfers, gives third parties confidence to release or retitle property, and helps protect trustees who act on a judicial ruling that clarifies trust ownership and distribution obligations.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and trust administration services for residents across California, including Dinuba and Tulare County. Our team assists clients with Heggstad petitions, trust modifications, and related filings such as pour-over wills and trust certifications. We focus on clear communication, careful case preparation, and strong courtroom presentation when court involvement is necessary. The firm’s practice addresses both straightforward filings and more complex matters involving real estate, retirement accounts, and contested trust issues while working to protect fiduciary duties, uphold the settlor’s documented wishes, and reach timely resolutions that minimize disruption for family members and beneficiaries.
A Heggstad petition in California asks the probate court to recognize that particular property should be treated as part of a deceased person’s trust. This often arises when the settlor intended assets to fund a trust through documents such as a pour-over will or a general assignment to trust, but the formal title to real estate or accounts was never changed. The petition provides the court with the facts and supporting documents to show that the decedent intended the property to be trust property, and it seeks a judicial declaration that allows the trustee to take control and distribute the asset according to the trust terms.
Not all trust administration matters require a Heggstad petition, but certain circumstances make it the appropriate method to clarify ownership. For example, when third parties refuse to recognize a trustee’s authority, or when property titles are in the decedent’s name alone despite trust language indicating otherwise, a petition creates a clear legal pathway. The process includes gathering deeds, trust documents, wills, beneficiary designations, and other evidence that supports the claim that the asset was intended to be trust property. A carefully prepared petition can help avoid contested disputes and assist trustees in fulfilling their duties.
A Heggstad petition is a specific probate court filing under California law used to establish that certain assets were intended to be part of a deceased person’s trust. The name comes from a California Supreme Court case that addressed when property should be treated as trust property despite not being retitled. The petition sets forth the factual and documentary basis for the trustee’s position, asks the court to declare the property part of the trust, and requests any orders needed to allow the trustee to manage or transfer the asset. The remedy simplifies distribution and prevents the unnecessary inclusion of trust property in probate proceedings.
Preparing a Heggstad petition requires assembling trust documents, wills, deeds, beneficiary forms, and correspondence that demonstrate the settlor’s intent. The petition should include a clear description of the asset, the relationship between the asset and the trust documents, and an explanation of why title was not changed prior to death. The court will review the evidence, consider any opposition, and determine whether the asset should be treated as trust property. If the petition is granted, the trustee receives an order confirming trust ownership, which facilitates retitling or distribution to beneficiaries according to the trust terms.
This glossary identifies important terminology used in Heggstad petitions and trust administration, offering plain-language explanations to help you follow the process. Terms include trust, trustee, settlor, pour-over will, certification of trust, and retitling. Understanding these key elements helps beneficiaries and trustees know what documents to gather and what legal standards the court will apply. Clear language and proper documentation are essential when preparing a petition, and being familiar with the terms will make conversations with counsel and the probate court more productive and efficient.
A trust is a legal arrangement where a person, called the settlor, places assets under the control of a trustee to manage for the benefit of designated beneficiaries. Trusts can be revocable or irrevocable and may include instruments such as revocable living trusts or special needs trusts. The trust document sets out how assets should be managed and distributed, naming successor trustees and beneficiaries, and often includes provisions for incapacity planning. Trusts are commonly used to avoid probate, maintain privacy, and provide continuity in asset management following the settlor’s death or incapacity.
A pour-over will is a testamentary document designed to transfer any remaining assets into a previously established trust at the time of death. If certain assets were inadvertently left out of the trust during the settlor’s lifetime, the pour-over will serves as a safety net to transfer those assets into the trust, subject to probate administration when necessary. While a pour-over will indicates intent for assets to end up in trust, it does not itself change title prior to death, which can create the need for filings such as a Heggstad petition to confirm trust ownership for specific items.
A trustee is the individual or entity charged with managing trust assets in accordance with the trust document and applicable law. Successor trustees step in when the original trustee becomes unable to serve or after the settlor’s death, taking on duties such as gathering assets, paying debts and taxes, and distributing property to beneficiaries. Trustees owe fiduciary duties to act in the beneficiaries’ best interests, maintain accurate records, and follow the trust terms closely. When property titles are unclear, trustees may file petitions to clarify ownership and enable proper administration.
A certification of trust is a condensed version of the trust document that confirms key facts—such as the trust’s existence, the trustee’s authority, and certain basic terms—without revealing the trust’s complete provisions. Financial institutions and third parties often accept a certification of trust as proof of the trustee’s power to act, which can help avoid disclosing detailed private terms. In the context of a Heggstad petition, a certification of trust can be part of the supporting documentation to show the trustee’s authority and the settlor’s intent for the asset to be trust property.
When assets intended for a trust remain titled in a decedent’s name, there are a few paths for resolution, including informal negotiation with third parties, probate administration, or filing a Heggstad petition. Negotiation may work when institutions accept a trustee’s instructions, but it can fail if title or documentation is disputed. Probate can transfer assets but adds time, cost, and public disclosure. A Heggstad petition seeks a judicial declaration that aligns the asset with the trust and avoids probate for that property. Choosing the appropriate route depends on the asset type, the willingness of third parties, and the evidence of intent.
A limited approach may be sufficient when banks, title companies, or other institutions readily accept a trustee’s certification of trust and associated paperwork. In such cases, the trustee can obtain access to accounts or retitle property without court involvement. This option avoids court fees and the time required for a petition, but it relies on the third party’s willingness to accept the documentation. Trustees should prepare complete and accurate records and be ready to provide additional proof of the settlor’s intent if the institution requests it to avoid future disputes.
If all beneficiaries and interested parties agree about the status of the asset and the settlor’s intent, they can often resolve matters through signed acknowledgments or stipulated actions that allow the trustee to proceed without court intervention. This cooperative path is often faster and less costly than formal litigation. Agreements should be documented in writing to prevent later disputes. Even when parties agree, it helps to have clear trust documentation and, where appropriate, recorded instruments such as deeds or account changes to reflect the trustee’s authority and prevent third-party challenges.
Comprehensive legal action may be needed when banks, title companies, or other holders of property decline to accept trustee documentation and refuse to transfer or retitle assets. In these situations, a trustee may have no practical way to access funds or convey property without a judicial determination. Filing a Heggstad petition allows the court to review the trust and supporting evidence and then issue an order confirming that the asset belongs to the trust. That court order typically compels third parties to cooperate and provides the trustee with legal protection for subsequent actions.
A petition becomes necessary if beneficiaries, heirs, or other interested parties contest whether an asset was meant to be trust property. Disputes can arise from ambiguous documents, inconsistent records, or competing claims. When parties are at odds, presenting the evidence to the court ensures a neutral decision grounded in legal standards and documented intent. The court’s declaration settles ownership questions, prevents later challenges, and furnishes trustees with the authority to manage or distribute the property as directed by the trust terms.
A comprehensive legal approach provides certainty, enforceable documentation, and a clear path for trustees to carry out their duties. When a Heggstad petition is granted, the resulting court order clarifies ownership, reduces the risk of future litigation, and often smooths transactions with financial institutions and title companies. That certainty can be particularly important for real estate transactions, retirement account transfers, or other high-value assets. By addressing ownership issues through the court, trustees can proceed with retitling, sale, or distribution with confidence that third parties will recognize the legal determination.
Another benefit of a comprehensive filing is the protection it offers trustees acting in good faith. A judicial declaration provides a record that supports decisions made during administration and can limit exposure to later claims from heirs or creditors. Additionally, resolving contested ownership in court can prevent prolonged disputes that drain resources and delay distributions to beneficiaries. While litigation involves costs and time, the long-term advantages of finality and formal recognition often outweigh the upfront investment when titles are unclear or opposition is likely.
Seeking a court order through a Heggstad petition produces an enforceable determination about whether an asset belongs to a trust, which third parties generally must honor. This clarity reduces the risk of future disputes and permits trustees to act on the court’s directive. An enforceable order can also help facilitate real estate transfers, clear title for sale or refinancing, and give successor trustees the ability to manage trust property without ambiguity. Ultimately, the certainty a court provides can protect both trustees and beneficiaries and help complete administration efficiently.
A formal judicial determination helps protect trustees from later claims by creating a public record of the court’s findings. That protection can reduce litigation risk and help trustees perform their duties with legal backing. Beneficiaries also benefit from the reduced potential for contested claims and the clarity regarding distribution. When assets are valuable or when dispute risk is elevated, obtaining a court declaration can prevent lengthy challenges and provide a final resolution that facilitates the orderly transfer of trust property to the rightful recipients.
Begin assembling all relevant documents as soon as a potential Heggstad petition is identified. Collect the trust instrument, any pour-over will, deeds, beneficiary designations, account statements, and correspondence that shows intent to fund the trust. Documentation that shows consistent intent and timelines strengthens a petition and can shorten court review. Early organization also allows a trustee to anticipate questions from financial institutions and title companies, and to prepare a clear factual narrative for the court that connects each asset to the trust provisions, reducing the risk of contested proceedings.
A certification of trust can be an efficient tool to show third parties that the trust exists and that the trustee has authority to act, while keeping sensitive provisions private. Many institutions accept a certification when transferring accounts or recognizing trustee authority. When a certification is insufficient, or when ownership remains disputed, a Heggstad petition will provide a judicial ruling that settles the matter. Preparing a clear certification and having backup copies of the full trust available for court review can streamline interactions with banks and title companies during administration.
Consider filing a Heggstad petition when important assets intended for a trust remain titled in the deceased’s name and you cannot obtain cooperation from the institutions or parties holding those assets. This often occurs with real estate, brokerage accounts, or accounts with restrictive transfer rules. A petition provides a formal legal route to obtain a court order declaring the asset part of the trust, which can then be retitled or distributed according to the trust terms. Filing is also advisable where there is risk of conflicting claims or uncertainty that could delay administration and distribution for beneficiaries.
Another reason to pursue a petition is to create a public, enforceable determination that protects trustees and beneficiaries from later disputes. When documentation is incomplete or titles were never updated despite clear trust language, the court’s declaration aligns legal title with the settlor’s intent and helps prevent future litigation. Families facing time-sensitive transactions such as property sales or refinancing may also find a court order expedites third-party cooperation, enabling trustees to act with confidence and complete necessary transfers or distributions in a timely manner.
Typical situations include real estate left in the decedent’s name, bank or investment accounts not updated to reflect trust ownership, or retirement accounts with inconsistent beneficiary designations. Other common circumstances involve funds intended to fund a trust through a general assignment or a pour-over will that were never retitled, or when a trustee faces resistance from third parties refusing to recognize the trust. Identifying these circumstances early, gathering evidence, and deciding whether to pursue a judicial declaration can save time and reduce costs during trust administration.
When property such as a home or other real estate was intended to be held in a trust but remains titled in the decedent’s name, a Heggstad petition can establish that the property should be treated as trust property. Real estate often triggers the need for clear title paperwork, and title companies may require a court order before allowing a trustee to transfer or sell the property. Filing a petition creates a judicial finding that helps clear title and supports subsequent transactions such as sale, refinancing, or transfer to beneficiaries.
Accounts that were intended for the trust but never retitled can be difficult to access after death. Banks and brokerages may refuse to recognize trustee authority without a court order or extensive documentation. A Heggstad petition can resolve these issues by providing a court declaration that the accounts belonged to the trust at the time of death. That court order usually convinces financial institutions to release funds to the trustee for distribution or transfer according to the trust terms.
Conflicting or unclear paperwork, such as beneficiary designations that do not match trust provisions, can lead to disputes that require court resolution. When documents point in different directions about who should receive an asset, a Heggstad petition brings the matter before the probate court for a definitive ruling. The court will weigh the trust language, wills, deeds, account records, and any other relevant evidence to determine whether the asset should be treated as trust property and then order the appropriate distribution or retitling.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assist Dinuba residents and Tulare County families in preparing and filing Heggstad petitions and related trust administration matters. We provide clear guidance on document gathering, prepare court filings that present the strongest factual narrative, and represent trustees in hearings when necessary. Our office helps trustees navigate interactions with financial institutions and title companies and works to reach efficient resolutions that preserve family relationships and protect trust assets. We strive to inform clients of options and to move matters forward with the appropriate level of court involvement.
At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we focus on clear communication and careful preparation when handling Heggstad petitions and trust administration. We assist clients in compiling the necessary documents, identifying the most effective legal route, and preparing petitions that present a coherent factual basis for the court. Our approach emphasizes minimizing unnecessary costs and delay by pursuing negotiation when feasible while being prepared to seek a court declaration when documentation and third-party cooperation make judicial relief the best option for protecting trust assets and enabling timely distributions.
We work closely with trustees to evaluate evidence such as trust instruments, deeds, beneficiary designations, and account statements and to create a persuasive record for the court or for third parties. When court involvement is required, we prepare pleadings, supporting declarations, and proposed orders that clearly articulate the trust’s terms and the settlor’s intent. We also advise trustees on recordkeeping, communication with beneficiaries, and steps to reduce the risk of future challenges, providing a practical roadmap for effective trust administration.
Our firm understands the practical and emotional challenges that families face during estate administration. We aim to resolve questions about trust ownership efficiently, protect trustees who act in good faith, and help families achieve distributions consistent with the settlor’s documented wishes. Whether a case is straightforward or contested, we provide focused support through each stage of the process, from initial document collection to court hearings and final implementation of the court’s orders to retitle or distribute assets.
Our process begins with an initial review of trust and asset records to determine whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate. We help gather deeds, trust instruments, certifications of trust, and account statements, and we assess whether third-party negotiation or a court filing will best accomplish the trustee’s goals. If a petition is recommended, we draft the necessary pleadings, prepare declarations and supporting exhibits, and file the petition with the probate court. We then represent the trustee in any hearings and work to obtain an enforceable order that clarifies title and enables administration to proceed smoothly.
The first phase focuses on reviewing all available documentation and evaluating the asset type and the strength of evidence that supports trust ownership. We identify missing items, obtain certified copies if needed, and contact institutions to determine what they require. This stage includes interviewing the trustee or family members to create a timeline and factual narrative showing the settlor’s intent. By thoroughly preparing and compiling documents early, we build a stronger petition and anticipate potential objections that might arise during court review.
We carefully review the trust instrument, any pour-over will, certification of trust, and related estate planning documents to identify provisions and language that support the inclusion of the asset in the trust. This analysis helps determine whether the evidence is sufficient to show that the asset was intended for the trust and whether additional documentation will strengthen the petition. Clear identification of the settlor’s intent and specific references to the property in question are critical components of the filing.
We collect deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, and any documents that reflect how the asset was handled during the settlor’s lifetime. Where records are incomplete, we identify sources for certified copies or alternative evidence to support the claim. Properly documented ownership history and corroborating statements from witnesses or institutions strengthen the petition and reduce the likelihood of contested proceedings, making the filing more likely to achieve a clear judicial determination.
Once documentation is assembled, we draft the petition, including a clear statement of facts, exhibits, and a proposed form of order for the court. The petition explains why the asset should be treated as trust property and attaches the trust document, deeds, and supporting evidence. We file the petition in the appropriate probate court and serve interested parties as required by law. Clear, well-supported pleadings increase the chances of a favorable ruling and help streamline any necessary hearings or negotiations with opposing parties.
Careful drafting of the petition and supporting declarations is essential to present the factual record in a way that the court can readily evaluate. We organize exhibits, explain the circumstances that led to the asset remaining untitled, and cite relevant law supporting the relief sought. A concise, well-structured petition reduces questions from the court and helps focus hearings on any disputed issues rather than procedural defects or missing information, which assists in achieving timely resolution.
After filing, proper service on beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested parties is required, and we manage any responses or objections that may arise. We evaluate the substance of any opposition, respond with supplemental declarations or evidence if appropriate, and seek to negotiate stipulated solutions where possible. If objections persist, we prepare for hearings by organizing testimony and exhibits that clearly demonstrate the trust relationship and the settlor’s intent for the asset to be treated as trust property.
At the hearing, the court considers the written record and any testimony to determine whether the asset should be declared part of the trust. We present the evidence in a concise manner, address any factual disputes, and request specific orders to permit retitling, transfer, or distribution. If the court grants the petition, it issues an order that trustees can use to work with title companies, banks, and other institutions. If the petition is denied, we review options for appeal or alternative remedies depending on the case facts.
During the hearing, we offer declarations, witness testimony, and documentary exhibits that establish the settlor’s intent and explain why the asset belongs to the trust. Clear organization of proof and a focused presentation help the court reach a determination efficiently. We anticipate common questions and provide legal authorities and factual explanations that align the trust documents with the specific property at issue, promoting a ruling that supports the trustee’s ability to manage or distribute the asset according to the trust terms.
Once the court issues an order declaring the asset part of the trust, we assist the trustee with implementing that order, including providing certified copies to banks or title companies and preparing any necessary deeds or transfer documents. That judicial determination typically compels third parties to retitle property or release funds, allowing the trustee to conclude administration tasks. We also advise trustees on recordkeeping and follow-up steps to minimize future disputes and maintain compliance with fiduciary obligations.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing asking the court to declare that a specific asset belonged to a deceased person’s trust at the time of death, even if the title or registration was never changed. This remedy is used when property intended for a trust remains in the decedent’s name, and third parties or institutions will not recognize the trustee’s authority without a court order. The petition typically includes the trust document, supporting exhibits such as deeds or account statements, and a factual narrative showing the settlor’s intent to have the asset held by the trust. This filing helps avoid probate for the asset in question by aligning legal title with the trust’s terms and providing a judicial order the trustee can use to retitle or distribute property. When institutions or title companies require clear proof of authority, a court order can resolve disputes and facilitate transfers. The process varies by case complexity and the nature of any opposition, but the petition’s goal is always to clarify ownership so the trustee can administer the trust according to the settlor’s wishes.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition depends on document readiness, court schedules, and whether interested parties contest the matter. If documentation is complete and there is little or no opposition, the process can move more quickly, often taking a few months from filing to the issuance of an order. However, court calendars, required service periods, and any hearing continuances can extend the timeline, and more complex disputes or contested hearings will add further time before resolution. Preparing the petition thoroughly and attempting to resolve potential objections early can reduce delays. When third parties require additional evidence, gathering certified copies or supplemental declarations may lengthen the preparation phase. An initial evaluation and document collection period helps create realistic expectations and allows trustees to plan for interim administrative steps while awaiting a final court determination.
Successful petitions rely on documentation that demonstrates the settlor’s intent for the asset to be part of the trust. Common evidence includes the trust instrument itself, pour-over wills, deeds that reference the trust or were executed in contemplation of funding the trust, account statements, beneficiary designation forms, and correspondence that shows consistent instruction to treat assets as trust property. Witness declarations or affidavits may also corroborate actions the settlor took to fund the trust. Where original documents are unavailable, certified copies, recorded deeds, or institutional records can serve as substitutes. The more complete and consistent the record, the stronger the presentation to the court. A clear factual narrative connecting the asset to the trust, accompanied by well-organized exhibits, increases the likelihood of a favorable judicial finding and helps prevent later challenges.
In some cases, banks or institutions will accept a certification of trust and other supporting paperwork to allow a trustee access to accounts without a court filing. If the institution is satisfied with the documentation and the trustee’s authority is clear, the trustee may be able to proceed without a petition. This route is more likely when account values are smaller, documentation is straightforward, and the institution’s policies allow discretion based on the materials provided. However, when institutions refuse to cooperate or when the asset holder requires a court order, a Heggstad petition becomes necessary. Trustees should assess the institution’s position early, provide a certification of trust where helpful, and be prepared to pursue a petition if third-party cooperation is withheld or if there is a risk of disputed ownership that would impede administration.
A Heggstad petition is filed in probate court and becomes part of the court record, so certain information becomes public in the court file. The petition can include exhibits such as deeds and trust certifications, and the court’s order will be recorded as a public document. That said, the petition process focuses on specific assets and a limited factual record rather than publishing the trust’s full private provisions. Many courts and practitioners work to limit disclosure of sensitive trust terms by submitting only the necessary documents and using certifications where possible. If privacy is a high priority, trustees and beneficiaries can discuss strategies for minimizing public disclosure during the petition process, such as filing redacted materials when permissible or using a certification of trust in lieu of the full trust document for third-party interactions. The balance between obtaining a binding court order and protecting private trust details should be considered in planning the petition.
Costs for filing a Heggstad petition vary depending on the complexity of the case, the number of interested parties, and whether the matter is contested. Expenses may include court filing fees, service costs, title company or document retrieval fees, and attorney fees for preparing pleadings and representing the trustee at hearings. Simple, uncontested matters will be less expensive, while contested petitions that require hearings, discovery, or substantial briefing can be significantly more costly due to additional time and court appearances. Early case assessment and thorough document preparation can help control costs by reducing the need for supplemental filings and limiting contested issues. Trustees should obtain a clear fee estimate and discuss options for negotiation or stipulation with interested parties to avoid protracted litigation when practical. Planning and communication often reduce overall expenses and expedite resolution.
If an interested party contests a Heggstad petition, the court will schedule hearings to consider the evidence and arguments of both sides. Contesting parties may challenge the sufficiency of the proof that the asset was intended for the trust, raise competing claims, or question the trustee’s actions. In contested proceedings, the court evaluates the trust documents, deeds, witness testimony, and other evidence to determine ownership and whether the asset should be declared part of the trust. Contested matters can extend timelines and increase costs, but they also allow for thorough judicial review of disputed issues. Parties sometimes resolve contests through negotiation, mediation, or stipulated orders that incorporate court oversight while avoiding protracted litigation. When disputes remain unresolved, the court’s ruling will determine ownership and the appropriate distribution or retitling of the asset.
A Heggstad petition is most commonly used for assets like real property and accounts that were intended for a trust but never retitled. Retirement accounts and life insurance policies, however, are often controlled by beneficiary designations rather than by trust ownership, so a petition may or may not be the appropriate remedy depending on how the asset was structured. If the retirement plan or policy names the trust as beneficiary and the documentation supports trust ownership, a petition might assist in clarifying access or distribution in certain scenarios. It is important to review plan documents and beneficiary designations carefully. In many cases, working directly with the plan administrator and providing proper trust certifications resolves issues without court action. When plan rules or conflicting designations create ambiguity, a petition can bring the dispute to the court for resolution, especially if the plan administrator refuses to follow the trustee’s instructions without a judicial order.
A certification of trust is often useful when interacting with financial institutions and title companies because it confirms the trust’s existence and the trustee’s authority without disclosing private terms. Many institutions accept a certification, along with identification and supporting documentation, to permit transfers or account access. While a certification does not replace a court order in contested situations, it can streamline cooperation and reduce the need for a petition when banks or title companies are willing to accept the trustee’s documentation. When a certification is insufficient or when an institution refuses to recognize the trustee, a Heggstad petition can provide a binding court determination that compels cooperation. Preparing a clear certification and maintaining the full trust document for court review strikes a balance between operational efficiency and protecting privacy. Trustees should be ready to use both approaches depending on third-party responses.
To begin the Heggstad petition process with our firm, contact the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman to schedule an initial consultation. During that meeting we will review the trust and available documents, discuss the specific asset or assets at issue, and outline the likely paths to resolution. We will identify the documents to gather, explain probable timelines and costs, and recommend whether to attempt negotiation with institutions or proceed directly to a court filing based on the circumstances. After agreeing on a plan, we assist with document collection, draft the petition and supporting declarations, and manage service and court filings. If opposition arises, we represent the trustee in hearings and work to obtain an enforceable order to retitle or distribute the asset according to the trust terms. Our goal is to achieve a clear resolution that enables trustees to complete administration with confidence and minimal disruption for beneficiaries.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas