If you are considering changes to an existing trust in Visalia or elsewhere in Tulare County, a trust modification petition may be the right path. This process allows trustees or interested parties to request judicial permission to alter the terms of a trust when circumstances have changed, beneficiaries disagree, or an error must be corrected. Understanding the reasons, legal standards, and likely outcomes is essential before filing. Our office can help explain local practices and the California Probate Code provisions that influence petitions, so you have a clear view of options, timing, and potential impacts on estate administration and family relationships.
Trust modification petitions address a range of circumstances, from correcting drafting mistakes to adapting to new tax rules, incapacitating events, or changed family dynamics. The petition typically outlines the requested change, the grounds for modification, and the parties involved. Courts evaluate petitions with consideration for the settlor’s intent, the trust language, and the best interests of beneficiaries. Pursuing a petition requires careful drafting, evidence, and often negotiation with beneficiaries or trustees. Planning ahead and gathering supporting documentation can improve the chance of a favorable resolution while minimizing delay and dispute in the estate planning process.
Filing a trust modification petition can preserve the settlor’s original intent while adapting to changed conditions, offering flexibility and legal clarity. When a trust no longer reflects current family circumstances, financial realities, or tax law, a court-ordered modification can prevent future disputes among beneficiaries and reduce the risk of costly litigations. The process can also correct drafting errors, address impractical provisions, or confirm a trustee’s authority. By securing an official modification, interested parties gain certainty about the administration of trust assets and help ensure the trust continues to serve its intended purposes for the people it was created to protect.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman has served clients across California, including Visalia and Tulare County, handling a broad array of estate planning matters such as trust creation, modification, and related petitions. Our team draws on deep knowledge of state law and courtroom practice to help clients navigate trust disputes, petitions, and court procedures reliably. We take time to evaluate the facts of each case, explain applicable rules and likely outcomes, and pursue solutions that align with clients’ goals. Our focus is on clear communication, practical problem solving, and protecting family relationships while addressing legal needs promptly and professionally.
A trust modification petition is a legal request submitted to a California probate court to change the terms or administration of a trust. Petitions may be filed by trustees, beneficiaries, or other interested persons depending on the nature of the modification sought. Courts review petitions against the trust instrument, any demonstrated intent of the settlor, and statutory provisions that govern wills and trusts. Evidence may include the trust document, communications from the settlor, financial records, and testimony. The process can vary with local court rules, so understanding required forms, notice procedures, and timelines is important before filing a petition.
Modifications fall into several categories such as clarifying ambiguous terms, correcting errors, adjusting for changed circumstances, or addressing ambiguous trustee powers. In some situations, a nonjudicial settlement agreement among all interested parties can achieve desired changes without court intervention, but when consensus is lacking or legal authority is in doubt, a petition becomes necessary. The probate judge will consider whether the proposed change aligns with the settlor’s intent and whether the modification is equitable to beneficiaries. Preparing a persuasive record and following procedural requirements is essential for a favorable judicial determination.
A trust modification petition seeks judicial approval to change the trust’s terms or the manner in which it is administered. Requests can include removing or replacing a trustee, reallocating assets, clarifying distribution terms, or correcting scrivener’s errors that distort the settlor’s intent. The petition must explain the legal basis for modification, present supporting evidence, and identify all interested parties who must receive notice. The court’s role is to ensure that changes are consistent with California law and the trust maker’s expressed wishes, balancing fairness to beneficiaries while preserving the trust’s original purpose whenever possible.
Filing a trust modification petition involves drafting a clear petition, gathering documentary and testimonial evidence, and providing proper notice to all interested parties. The court may schedule hearings, allow objections, and require mediation or settlement efforts before ruling. Important elements include a factual statement of changed circumstances, legal citations supporting the requested relief, and proposed orders for the judge’s consideration. Timely and accurate service of documents is essential. The process can result in an agreed order if parties settle, or a judicial decision resolving contested issues after the court hears evidence and legal arguments.
This glossary highlights common terms used in trust modification proceedings to help you follow court filings and legal discussions. Definitions include settlor, trustee, beneficiary, petition, modification, amendment, and pour-over will, among others. Understanding these concepts helps clarify who can request changes, what standards courts apply, and how proposed changes affect distributions and administration. Familiarizing yourself with these terms before conversations or filings makes it easier to assess options and participating in settlement discussions. If questions arise about particular words in a trust document, legal counsel can explain their practical meaning in the context of California law.
Settlor refers to the person who created and funded the trust. The settlor’s written intent, as reflected in the trust instrument and related documents, guides how courts analyze proposed modifications. Courts attempt to honor the settlor’s expressed goals whenever possible, so evidence of intent is central to petition proceedings. If the settlor is alive, their current wishes may be relevant, subject to capacity rules. If the settlor is deceased, prior statements, trust language, and surrounding circumstances will inform judicial decisions. Identifying the settlor’s intent helps resolve ambiguities and ensures the trust continues to serve its original purpose.
The trustee is the individual or entity charged with managing trust assets and carrying out the terms of the trust. Trustees have fiduciary duties to beneficiaries, including loyalty, prudence, and impartiality. In modification proceedings, a trustee may petition the court for clarification or changes to duties, powers, or distributions when uncertainties or changes arise. A trustee also responds to petitions filed by beneficiaries. The court evaluates trustee actions against the trust document and legal duty standards, and can remove, replace, or direct trustees as necessary to protect beneficiaries’ interests and ensure proper administration of the trust.
A beneficiary is a person or organization entitled to receive benefits from the trust under its terms. Beneficiaries are often the most directly affected parties in modification petitions, as changes can alter timing, amount, or conditions of distributions. Courts require that beneficiaries receive notice of petitions and an opportunity to raise objections. Because beneficiaries’ interests may differ, the court will weigh competing positions and evaluate whether a proposed modification aligns with the settlor’s intent. Protecting beneficiary rights and communicating potential impacts helps preserve relationships and reduce conflict during the modification process.
An amendment is typically a nonjudicial change to a trust made by the settlor with the authority reserved in the trust document, whereas a modification often involves judicial intervention when the settlor is unavailable, incapacitated, or when parties dispute the appropriate course. Modifications may be necessary to correct errors, adapt to changed circumstances, or resolve ambiguities. Courts evaluate whether a proposed modification is consistent with the trust’s purpose and the settlor’s intent. Understanding the distinction helps determine whether negotiation among parties or a court petition is the appropriate avenue for change.
When a trust needs updating, parties can pursue nonjudicial solutions such as mutual agreements among beneficiaries or relying on powers of amendment retained by the settlor, if available. These approaches can be quicker and less costly but require consensus. When consensus is not achievable or the settlor lacks capacity, a court petition becomes the viable option. Court intervention brings formal procedures and the potential for contested hearings, but it also provides an authoritative resolution. Evaluating the likelihood of agreement, the nature of the requested change, and the relationship dynamics will guide the decision about which route to take.
A nonjudicial change is often the best choice when all beneficiaries and the trustee agree on the modification. Consensus allows parties to avoid court costs and public filings, preserve privacy, and implement changes more quickly. Achieving a mutual agreement requires clear communication and documentation that reflects the new arrangement, including amendments or a settlement agreement signed by all interested persons. Legal counsel can draft the necessary documents to ensure the change is legally effective and consistent with the trust’s terms, covering potential future disputes and outlining procedures for enforcement without initiating formal judicial proceedings.
If the trust instrument expressly grants the settlor the power to amend or revoke the trust and the settlor is capable of exercising that power, amendments can be made without court involvement. This is often the simplest route to update distributions, change trustees, or correct drafting errors. However, if questions about capacity or undue influence arise, parties may still seek court guidance. Properly documenting the settlor’s actions and ensuring compliance with trust formalities is key. When the settlor acts directly, changes are more likely to reflect the original intent and avoid protracted disputes among beneficiaries.
A comprehensive approach is warranted when trust changes involve intricate family dynamics, significant assets, or tax implications that require careful legal analysis. Courts often examine the broader context of the settlor’s intentions, prior estate planning documents, and the financial effects of any change on beneficiaries. Addressing these matters thoroughly can prevent unintended consequences and disputes. A well-rounded plan includes reviewing related documents, evaluating tax outcomes, and preparing persuasive evidence for court consideration, aiming for results that protect assets and maintain fairness among beneficiaries while complying with applicable California law.
When beneficiaries or trustees disagree about the need for a modification, a comprehensive legal strategy helps manage litigation risk and negotiate settlements effectively. Contested matters can involve allegations about the settlor’s capacity, undue influence, or ambiguous trust language. Preparing for these disputes often requires detailed discovery, evidentiary support, and court advocacy. Addressing potential objections early and seeking resolution through mediation or settlement talks can reduce costs and preserve family relationships. A careful approach ensures petitions are well-drafted and that procedural requirements are met to avoid delays or adverse rulings.
A comprehensive strategy promotes clarity and reduces future conflict by ensuring modifications are legally sound and supported by documentation. Thorough preparation helps courts and parties understand the facts and rationale for change, leading to more predictable outcomes. When consultation, negotiation, and careful drafting are used, parties often reach settlements that comply with the settlor’s goals and minimize litigation costs. This approach also anticipates potential tax and administrative consequences, allowing for coordinated solutions that align with broader estate plans and preserve family relationships while meeting statutory requirements in California.
Comprehensive planning provides an added measure of protection for trustees and beneficiaries by documenting decisions and securing court approval when necessary. This reduces the likelihood of future challenges or ambiguities that could disrupt trust administration. A complete analysis considers alternate dispute resolution, timing, and the practical steps to implement changes after a court order or agreement. By focusing on long-term clarity and enforceability, a comprehensive approach helps ensure that modifications are durable, equitable, and consistent with the trust maker’s ultimate objectives while reducing the administrative burden on trustees and the risk of costly litigation.
Seeking court approval for significant trust changes provides legal certainty that private agreements might lack. A judicial order resolving contested points carries the weight of the court and limits the chances of future challenges. This is particularly valuable in high-value trust administrations or where beneficiaries are geographically dispersed. By creating a formal record and obtaining an enforceable order, parties can reduce ambiguity in distribution instructions and trustee powers. Greater certainty simplifies the trustee’s duties moving forward and helps ensure that the trust performs as intended over time, preserving assets and honoring the settlor’s vision.
A comprehensive process protects both trustees and beneficiaries by clarifying roles, duties, and distributions. Trustees gain confidence in administering assets when court orders or well-documented agreements resolve uncertainties. Beneficiaries benefit from transparent decisions that reflect the trust’s objectives and legal standards. This reduces the risk of future claims and helps maintain orderly management of trust assets. Additionally, a thoughtful approach can address successor trustee designations, guardianship nominations, and related estate planning tools to provide continuity and avoid administrative complications in the future.
Collecting all pertinent documents early in the process saves time and strengthens a petition. Relevant materials include the original trust instrument, amendments, related wills such as pour-over wills, powers of attorney, trust funding records, beneficiary communications, and any prior correspondence that reflects the settlor’s intent. Tax records and financial statements can be helpful when changes affect asset allocation. Preparing a clear chronology of events and documenting the reasons for modification provides a solid factual foundation for negotiations or court filings, reducing surprises and improving the prospects for a favorable resolution.
When pursuing a petition, consider not only the immediate change but also how the modification will affect future administration, successor trustee duties, and potential tax consequences. Draft orders or settlement agreements that anticipate follow-up tasks and clearly allocate responsibilities so trustees know how to proceed after a court order. Addressing administrative details in advance reduces the likelihood of additional disputes. Including provisions for successor trustees, guardianship nominations, or related trust instruments ensures continuity and aligns the modified trust with the broader estate plan to meet the settlor’s long-term objectives.
People seek trust modification petitions for many reasons, including correcting drafting errors, addressing ambiguous provisions, adapting to material changes in family circumstances, or responding to new tax regulations. Changes in beneficiary needs, such as financial hardship or disability, may warrant redistribution or creation of subtrusts. Trustee incapacity, disagreements among beneficiaries, or discovery of assets not contemplated by the original trust can also prompt petitions. Evaluating the specific facts and goals will determine whether a court petition is appropriate and whether alternatives such as nonjudicial settlements might achieve the desired result faster and with less expense.
Other considerations include ensuring that trust documents align with related instruments like pour-over wills, power of attorney documents, and health care directives, and addressing any unintended conflicts between documents. Trust modification petitions can also clarify distribution timing, set conditions for gifts, or create trusts for heirs with special needs or unique circumstances. When the settlor is incapacitated or deceased and documents are ambiguous, a petition helps obtain judicial clarity. Thoughtful planning and legal guidance make it possible to adjust trust terms to current realities while minimizing family conflict and administrative burdens.
Common circumstances include changes in beneficiary relationships such as marriage, divorce, or death, discovery of drafting errors, changes in asset structure, or tax law changes that make prior trust provisions impractical. Trustee resignations or incapacity can prompt petitions to appoint successors or clarify trustee powers. Disputes among beneficiaries over distribution methods or timing also frequently result in petitions. When a trust’s operation leads to unintended consequences or when beneficiaries’ needs evolve, judicial modification provides a structured process to address those issues and ensure trust administration aligns with the settlor’s goals.
Family events such as marriage, divorce, the birth of grandchildren, or the death of a beneficiary often necessitate revisiting trust terms to ensure distributions remain appropriate. A petition may be needed when trust language does not anticipate new family relationships or when beneficiaries disagree about how to account for these changes. Courts will consider evidence about the settlor’s intent and the fairness of proposed changes among beneficiaries. Addressing family dynamics through a formal process helps update estate plans to reflect current realities and preserves harmony among heirs by resolving disputes with legal clarity.
When a trust contains ambiguous language or a drafting mistake that changes meaning, a modification petition can correct the record and resolve uncertainty. Scrivener’s errors, conflicting provisions, or omitted clauses can undermine a trustee’s ability to act or create disagreement among beneficiaries. Courts review the trust document and supporting evidence to determine the settlor’s intended terms and may grant modifications to effectuate that intent. Correcting errors through the judicial process provides a reliable solution that trustees can follow without fear of future litigation over the same ambiguous provisions.
Changes in tax law or the discovery of new assets may make existing trust provisions inefficient or counterproductive. A petition can restructure distributions, reallocate assets, or adjust trust mechanisms to address tax consequences and better preserve estate value for beneficiaries. Courts will assess the legal basis for modification and weigh the settlor’s intent against the practical need for change. Addressing financial implications through a formal petition helps ensure trust administration continues to protect family wealth while complying with applicable statutes and preserving the settlor’s overall estate plan goals.
Our office provides representation for trust modification petitions in Visalia and throughout Tulare County, offering guidance through each step of the process from initial consultation to court filings and hearings. We help clients understand whether a nonjudicial path is viable, prepare persuasive petitions with supporting evidence, and coordinate notice and settlement efforts with all interested parties. Whether you face a drafting error, a trustee dispute, or a need to adapt a trust to changing circumstances, we can assist in evaluating options and pursuing a solution that aligns with your objectives and protects family interests while complying with California legal requirements.
Choosing the right legal representation matters when trust terms are contested or unclear. Our firm has a long practice in estate planning matters that involve trust administration, petitions, and trust litigation across California. We focus on practical solutions that reflect clients’ priorities and the legal framework governing trusts in Tulare County and statewide. From detailed document review to careful evidence preparation and courtroom advocacy when necessary, our approach aims to secure durable results while respecting family relationships and minimizing avoidable expense and delay.
We emphasize clear communication, timely filings, and thoughtful preparation that addresses both legal and personal aspects of trust modification matters. Our team helps clients understand procedural requirements, potential outcomes, and available alternatives, including mediation or negotiated settlements. We also coordinate with financial and tax advisors when needed to anticipate consequences of proposed changes. By taking a thorough and practical approach, we work to protect clients’ interests and achieve resolutions that reflect the settlor’s original intent and current family needs.
Handling trust modification matters in Visalia requires familiarity with local rules, court practices, and the nuances of California probate law. We prepare petitions and proposed orders carefully to meet court expectations, manage service and notice obligations, and respond to objections effectively. Our goal is to reduce uncertainty and provide a path toward reliable administration of trust assets, whether through agreement among parties or judicial decision. We also help implement court orders after resolution so trustees can carry out their duties with confidence.
At the outset we evaluate the trust documents, the facts that prompt the request, and the parties involved to determine whether a court petition is necessary or a nonjudicial solution is feasible. We advise on evidence to gather, draft the petition and accompanying declarations, handle service and notice, and pursue settlement talks when appropriate. If the matter proceeds to hearing, we present the case with clear legal arguments and factual support. After a resolution, we assist with implementing orders and updating trust records, ensuring the modified trust functions as intended going forward.
The first step is a thorough case evaluation and review of trust-related documents, including the trust instrument, amendments, pour-over wills, powers of attorney, and financial records. We identify whether the trust reserves amendment powers, whether ambiguities exist, and which parties have standing. This review also assesses potential grounds for modification such as errors, changed circumstances, or disputes. By understanding the document history and objectives, we can advise on likely outcomes and prepare a strategy that anticipates necessary evidence and procedural steps for filing a petition in Tulare County courts.
Collecting documentary and testimonial evidence is critical to support a petition. This may include the trust document and amendments, letters or notes reflecting the settlor’s intent, financial statements, and witness declarations. Declarations from trustees, beneficiaries, or professionals can explain the reasons for the requested change and document events that justify modification. Properly organized evidence helps the court understand both the factual record and the legal basis for the relief sought. A well-prepared evidentiary package increases the likelihood of a clear and efficient resolution.
Before filing, it is essential to identify all interested parties who must receive notice under California probate rules, including beneficiaries, trustees, and potential heirs. Determining standing and ensuring accurate service prevents procedural defects that could delay or invalidate proceedings. We prepare and review service lists, draft proper notices, and confirm compliance with statutory timelines. Addressing these procedural necessities early keeps petitions on track and reduces opportunities for objections based on lack of notice or improper party identification.
After preparing the petition and supporting evidence, we file with the appropriate Tulare County probate court and serve all interested parties. The court may schedule conferences or hearings and may require additional disclosures or mediation efforts. Responding to objections and engaging in settlement discussions often occurs during this phase. We advocate for the proposed modification through legal briefs, declarations, and court appearances as needed. Throughout, we keep clients informed about timelines, possible outcomes, and options for resolving disputes short of trial when appropriate.
Many trust modification matters can be resolved through negotiation or mediation, which preserve privacy and reduce costs. We represent clients in settlement talks, prepare settlement documents, and ensure that any agreement is legally enforceable. Mediation allows parties to work with a neutral facilitator to reach a mutually acceptable outcome while avoiding the stress of contested hearings. If settlement is achieved, we seek an agreed order to formalize changes and guide post-resolution administration, ensuring the modified trust is implemented smoothly and in accordance with both court expectations and the parties’ intentions.
When a matter proceeds to a contested hearing, our preparation focuses on presenting clear factual narratives and legal arguments that support the requested modification. This includes organizing witness testimony, documentary evidence, and legal authorities that the judge will consider. We handle motions, replies to objections, and courtroom procedures so clients can focus on outcomes rather than logistics. Our goal is to obtain an enforceable court order that effectuates the settlor’s intent while balancing the rights of beneficiaries and ensuring the trust can be administered effectively post-decision.
Once a court grants a modification, it is important to implement the order and update trust administration records to reflect the change. This may involve transferring assets, updating account titles, notifying financial institutions, and revising ancillary estate planning documents like pour-over wills or powers of attorney. We assist in drafting and filing any required documents, coordinating asset transfers, and advising trustees on new duties. Proper implementation preserves continuity in trust management and reduces the risk of future disputes about whether the court’s order was followed correctly.
After a modification order, trustees should record any necessary documents and notify beneficiaries, institutions, and advisors about the changes to avoid confusion during administration. This may include delivering certified copies of court orders, updating account beneficiaries, or changing trust asset titles. Clear communication and documentation help trustees carry out distributions and reduce the chance of later claims. We prepare the necessary paperwork and coordinate with banks, brokerages, and other custodians to reflect the modified trust terms in asset records and beneficiary designations.
Ensuring compliance with the court order and properly closing the case are important final steps. We confirm that asset transfers occurred, obligations are met, and the trust functions under the new terms. If follow-up filings or additional court approvals are required, we handle those tasks promptly. Providing a complete record and guidance to trustees and beneficiaries minimizes future administrative issues. A systematic follow-up also addresses any remaining concerns or unintended consequences, helping families move forward with a clear, enforceable trust framework.
A trust modification petition is a formal request to the probate court to alter the terms or administration of an existing trust when nonjudicial methods are unavailable or when parties disagree. Typically filed by trustees, beneficiaries, or other interested persons, the petition sets out the requested changes, the factual basis for the request, and identifies all interested parties. The court then evaluates whether the proposed modification aligns with the settlor’s intent and applicable law. Filing a petition is necessary when a trust cannot be changed through the settlor or a mutual agreement among interested parties. Courts in California will review documents, testimonial evidence, and legal arguments before granting or denying the requested relief.
The timeline for trust modification matters depends on the complexity of the issues, the number of interested parties, and whether the matter is contested. Simple agreed modifications can be resolved relatively quickly with appropriate documentation, while contested petitions that require evidence and hearings may take several months or longer to reach resolution. Local court schedules and procedural requirements also affect timing. Engaging counsel early to assess documents, manage notice procedures, and attempt settlement can shorten the process and reduce costs associated with prolonged litigation in Tulare County courts.
Yes, trusts can sometimes be modified after the settlor has died, depending on the terms of the trust and the legal basis for change. Courts consider evidence of the settlor’s intent, the trust language, and whether modification is necessary to effectuate the trust’s purpose. Post-death modifications often require a petition because the settlor can no longer amend the document personally, and interested parties may disagree. The probate court will evaluate whether the proposed change is consistent with the settlor’s objectives and whether it is equitable to beneficiaries before granting relief to ensure the trust continues to serve its intended function.
Courts consider the trust document, any amendments, relevant correspondence, witness testimony, and declarations that shed light on the settlor’s intent and the reasons for the requested modification. Financial records and expert reports may be relevant when tax or asset valuation issues arise. Courts weigh whether changes are supported by clear and convincing evidence that the modification reflects the settlor’s intent or is necessary to correct errors or adapt to changed circumstances. Procedural compliance, such as proper notice to beneficiaries, also influences whether a petition proceeds and how the judge evaluates the merits of the requested relief.
Alternatives to a court petition include nonjudicial settlement agreements among all interested parties and amendments executed by the settlor if the trust reserves amendment powers. Mediation and negotiation can resolve disputes while preserving privacy and reducing costs. These options require consensus, however, and cannot override the rights of interested parties who decline to participate. When a mutual agreement is reached, legal counsel can draft enforceable documents that reflect the new arrangements and avoid public court involvement. When consensus is not possible, filing a petition is usually the necessary step to obtain binding judicial resolution.
California probate rules require that all interested parties, including beneficiaries, trustees, and potential heirs, receive notice of a trust modification petition. Proper service ensures that parties have an opportunity to participate, object, or seek mediation. Methods of notice depend on the court’s procedural rules but typically include personal service or mail with proof of delivery. Failure to provide accurate notice can result in delays or dismissal, so careful identification and service of all affected parties is essential. Counsel can manage service procedures to comply with statutory timelines and reduce the risk of procedural objections.
Trust modifications can have tax implications depending on the nature of the change and the assets involved. Changes that affect asset allocations, beneficiary designations, or the structure of subtrusts may alter estate or income tax consequences. Coordinating with a tax professional can help anticipate and mitigate adverse tax effects. When preparing a petition, it is important to consider both probate and tax consequences so that the modification preserves more of the estate’s value for beneficiaries. Addressing taxation proactively in the petition or settlement discussions often leads to more durable results and fewer surprises for heirs.
If beneficiaries object to a proposed modification, the court will provide an opportunity for objections to be heard and for evidence to be presented. Objecting parties may argue that the modification contradicts the settlor’s intent or is unfair to certain beneficiaries. The judge will weigh competing evidence and legal arguments before deciding. Mediation or settlement efforts can sometimes resolve objections without a contested hearing. When disputes persist, preparing a thorough evidentiary record and clear legal framework for the proposed change increases the likelihood of a favorable court determination.
A trustee can be removed or replaced through a petition when there are valid grounds such as breach of fiduciary duty, incapacity, conflict of interest, or inability to perform trustee duties. The petition should present evidence supporting the requested removal and propose an appropriate successor. Courts evaluate whether removal serves the trust’s best interests and preserves the settlor’s intent. If removal is granted, the court will issue orders specifying the successor trustee’s powers and responsibilities, ensuring a smooth transition in trust administration to protect beneficiary interests and maintain continuity of management.
For an initial consultation about a trust modification, bring the trust instrument, any amendments, related estate planning documents such as pour-over wills and powers of attorney, relevant financial records, and correspondence that may shed light on the settlor’s intent. A timeline of events and a summary of the issues prompting the proposed change will also help. Having a clear list of interested parties and current trustees is useful. With these materials, counsel can assess whether a nonjudicial solution is possible or whether filing a petition is advisable, and can outline next steps, expected timelines, and potential outcomes.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas