A Heggstad petition can be the solution when a trust was intended to own certain property but the title was never properly transferred. Property left out of a trust can create delays, confusion, and potential probate exposure for families in East Sonora and throughout Tuolumne County. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assist families with clear, methodical petitions to the court that ask a judge to recognize that trust assets include specific property despite a missing deed or transfer. We prioritize practical solutions that help move a matter toward resolution while protecting family interests and the settlor’s intent.
If an untransferred asset threatens the smooth administration of a trust, filing a Heggstad petition asks the court to confirm that the asset should be treated as trust property. This process often requires gathering historical documents, deeds, trust records, and testimony about the settlor’s intent. Working with an established estate planning practice in California helps ensure that petitions are prepared with careful attention to local rules and judicial expectations. Our team communicates clearly, prepares thorough documentation, and stays focused on reducing delays so beneficiaries can move forward with administration and distribution as intended.
A successful Heggstad petition can prevent the unnecessary expense and public nature of probate for property that the settlor intended to remain in trust. By obtaining a court declaration that certain assets are trust property, families can streamline administration and reduce disputes among beneficiaries. The petition process also clarifies title issues for third parties such as banks, title companies, and county recorders, making it easier to sell, refinance, or otherwise manage assets. For many clients, the greatest benefit is certainty: a judicial ruling aligning assets with the trust secures the settlor’s wishes and provides a clear path for trustees to act.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients across California with a focus on estate planning and trust administration. Based in San Jose and assisting residents in Tuolumne County and East Sonora, our practice offers practical, court-savvy representation for Heggstad petitions and related trust matters. We combine detailed document preparation with measured courtroom advocacy, guiding trustees and beneficiaries through the steps needed to resolve title discrepancies. Our approach emphasizes plain-language explanations, timely communication, and tailored strategies to protect client interests while reducing uncertainty during the trust administration process.
A Heggstad petition asks a probate court to determine that property should be treated as part of a trust despite the absence of a formal transfer into the trust name. This remedy is used when the settlor clearly intended the asset to belong to the trust but an administrative oversight or other circumstances left the title unchanged. The petition typically includes evidence such as the trust document, purchase contracts, communications, payment records, or declarations showing the settlor’s intent. The court then evaluates whether equitable principles or the settlor’s demonstrated actions support treating the asset as trust property.
The mechanics of a Heggstad petition can include submitting declarations, attaching documentary proof of intent, and sometimes presenting testimony at a hearing. The court will consider whether the trustee and beneficiaries agree about the asset’s status or whether a third party raises title concerns. If the petition is granted, the court issues an order interpreting the trust to include the asset, which helps trustees manage, sell, or distribute the property according to the trust terms. This process can protect beneficiary interests and keep assets within the plan set out by the settlor, avoiding probate and public administration where possible.
A Heggstad petition formally requests that a probate court declare a named asset to be part of a settlor’s trust despite a missing or defective transfer. The petition relies on evidence of the settlor’s clear intent and supporting documents such as trust instruments, deeds, payment history, or other records. It asks the court to interpret the trust consistent with that intent and to order that the asset be handled as trust property. The result relieves trustees from uncertainty and reduces the likelihood that those assets will be exposed to probate or contested distribution.
Preparing a Heggstad petition involves gathering documentary evidence, drafting declarations, checking title records, and preparing a proposed order for the court. Trustees and counsel must assemble evidence that demonstrates the settlor intended the asset to be held in trust, which may include contemporaneous notes, correspondence with title companies, purchase paperwork, or documentation of payments made from trust funds. The petition filing initiates a judicial review, and the court will assess whether the weight of the evidence supports treating the asset as trust property. Careful preparation increases the likelihood of a clear, enforceable order.
Understanding common terms helps trustees and beneficiaries follow the petition process. Terms such as settlor, trustee, beneficiary, title, recordable transfer, and trust administration frequently arise. Familiarity with these concepts makes it easier to collect the right documents and frame the evidence the court will review. This section defines the most relevant items and explains how they relate to trust funding, recordation, and the court’s authority to interpret trust documents and order corrections to title when appropriate. Clear definitions reduce confusion and support a smoother petition process.
The settlor is the person who created the trust and transferred assets into it or intended to do so. The settlor’s intent is central to a Heggstad petition because the court reviews actions and documents to determine whether the settlor intended the disputed asset to be part of the trust. Evidence of intent may include the trust document itself, contemporaneous notes, or other records of the settlor’s actions. Understanding the settlor’s role and documented wishes helps the court align property title with the trust’s terms.
The trustee is the individual or entity responsible for managing trust assets in accordance with the trust document and the law. When a property issue arises, the trustee often initiates a Heggstad petition to clarify that a specific asset belongs to the trust. The trustee must present supporting evidence and may need to provide declarations explaining how the settlor intended the asset to be handled. A clear court order helps the trustee take concrete actions, such as transferring title, selling property, or distributing proceeds to beneficiaries.
Title refers to legal ownership of property as shown on county records. Recordation is the act of filing deeds or other documents with the county recorder to reflect a change of ownership. A Heggstad petition seeks judicial recognition that property title should be treated as belonging to the trust even when recordation did not occur. If the court grants the petition, its order can be used to correct records, convince title companies, or clear a path for sale or refinancing of the property in accordance with the trust’s terms.
Probate avoidance refers to strategies that keep assets out of the public probate process, preserving privacy and often reducing time and expense. A Heggstad petition supports probate avoidance by confirming that assets belong to a trust, which typically permits private administration and transfer under trust terms rather than probate court oversight. When the court recognizes property as trust-owned, trustees can proceed with management and distribution under the trust, minimizing the need for probate and its attendant delays and disclosures.
When an asset was not formally transferred into a trust, trustees and beneficiaries have multiple options, including filing a Heggstad petition, initiating probate, or attempting to resolve the issue through title company procedures. Each path has trade-offs: probate may be public and time-consuming, while title solutions sometimes require additional documentation or insurer acceptance. A Heggstad petition is a focused legal avenue to obtain a judicial declaration that an asset is trust property, which can provide a definitive resolution and help trustees act promptly. Choosing the right path depends on the facts, timelines, and the parties involved.
A limited, nonjudicial approach may be sufficient when the trust document and transaction records clearly demonstrate the settlor’s intent and a title insurer or recorder will accept corrective documentation. If a deed placeholders or transfer paperwork exists that can be filed or corrected without court intervention, parties may resolve the issue promptly. This approach avoids court costs and a formal petition, but it requires cooperation from title companies and accurate records. When documentation aligns and stakeholders agree, a streamlined administrative correction can be an efficient solution.
When trustees, beneficiaries, and any third parties are in agreement about the asset’s intended ownership and are willing to sign corrective documents, a limited approach may succeed. Mutual consent can simplify the transfer process as parties coordinate with title companies and county recorders to update records. However, even where agreement exists, some title companies still require a court order for certain types of title defects. In such cases, the parties should weigh the time and certainty benefits of a Heggstad petition against the administrative route.
A comprehensive legal approach is often needed when ownership is disputed or when heirs, creditors, or other parties challenge whether an asset belongs in the trust. In those circumstances, the clarity and finality that a court order provides can prevent prolonged disputes and protect the interests of trustees and beneficiaries. Preparing a thorough petition, compiling persuasive evidence, and being ready to present the matter at a hearing can help secure a definitive outcome that supports administration under the trust terms rather than defaulting to probate or piecemeal resolution.
Some title defects cannot be corrected administratively and require judicial relief to satisfy title companies or county recorders. Situations such as incomplete deeds, ambiguous conveyances, or older transactions with missing paperwork may need a court order to establish the trust’s ownership. When the path to clear title is uncertain or when third parties refuse to accept documents without a court determination, a comprehensive legal approach that includes filing a Heggstad petition becomes the most reliable way to secure the necessary authority to transfer or manage the asset according to the trust.
A comprehensive approach to a Heggstad petition combines careful documentation, legal argument, and readiness for court proceedings, which can produce a binding order that title companies and county officials will accept. Having a clear judicial determination reduces future disputes and gives trustees confidence to act, whether that means transferring title, selling property, or distributing proceeds. The resulting certainty can save time and expenses over the long run by preventing repeated challenges and minimizing the risk of reopening administration due to unresolved title questions.
Comprehensive preparation also ensures that the petition addresses foreseeable evidentiary issues and presents a cohesive narrative of the settlor’s intent. Well-prepared filings anticipate common objections and include supporting declarations, historical payment records, and trust documents to support the requested relief. When judges see a thorough administrative record, courts are more likely to issue a decisive order. That finality protects the settlor’s plan, preserves privacy by avoiding probate, and enables trustees to complete their duties with greater assurance.
One of the primary benefits of pursuing a comprehensive petition is achieving finality and clear title for the asset in question. A court order confirming that property is held in trust provides a strong basis for updating public records and reassuring banks, buyers, or title insurers. With clear title, trustees can proceed with transactions or distributions without fear that the asset will be later recharacterized. This clarity reduces administrative burdens and helps families complete the settlor’s wishes promptly and privately.
A comprehensive petition can limit the potential for future disagreements by providing an authoritative ruling on asset ownership. When the court has reviewed the evidence and issued an order, parties are less likely to bring subsequent challenges that reopen administration. That judicial determination protects beneficiaries and trustees by establishing a clear roadmap for distribution and management. Reduced litigation risk can translate into lower long-term costs and a more peaceful resolution for families handling sensitive matters after a settlor’s passing.
Start by collecting all relevant documents such as the trust instrument, deeds, title reports, closing statements, payment records, and any correspondence that reflects the settlor’s intent. Early documentation gathering saves time and can reveal straightforward solutions without court intervention. If records are fragmented, a methodical approach to reconstructing the relevant history increases the strength of a petition and helps create a persuasive narrative about why the asset should be treated as trust property. Organized records also reduce the chance of unexpected delays when the petition is filed.
Evaluate whether a nonjudicial correction is possible or whether a judicial petition will provide the certainty needed for title companies or county recorders. Assessing timing can reveal whether a prompt court order is necessary to enable transactions such as sales or refinancing. When urgency exists, prepare and file a petition with supporting evidence quickly to minimize delays. At the same time, weigh the costs and benefits of litigation versus administrative fixes and strive for a path that both resolves title issues and respects the settlor’s intentions.
Consider a Heggstad petition when an asset that was intended to be in a trust remains titled in the settlor’s name or a third party’s name, and when administrative steps cannot resolve the defect. Common triggers include missing deeds, ambiguous conveyances, or situations where title insurers will not insure without a court order. A petition brings the issue before a probate judge who can declare the asset part of the trust, enabling trustees to act in accordance with the trust’s terms. This helps preserve privacy and avoid the time and expense of probate when appropriate.
You should also consider a Heggstad petition when a transaction involving the disputed asset is imminent, such as a sale, refinance, or transfer that requires clear title. In these scenarios, obtaining judicial confirmation reduces the risk of later challenges and enables trustees to move forward. Additionally, when family members or potential heirs disagree about ownership, a petition creates a formal record that resolves disputes and protects both trustees and beneficiaries. Overall, the petition is a practical tool to align title with the settlor’s plan and to ensure orderly administration.
Typical circumstances include when a deed was never recorded after a trust was created, when property was purchased with trust funds but never retitled, when an old instrument is ambiguous about ownership, or when a third party refuses to accept corrective documents. Other triggers are missing paperwork from years earlier, transfers completed informally, or trust amendments that were not reflected in county records. In all these cases, a Heggstad petition provides a structured legal remedy to align the property’s recorded ownership with the settlor’s documented intentions.
A common issue arises when a settlor intended to transfer property into a trust but the deed was never recorded. This can happen due to oversight or during a period of personal change. The unrecorded deed leaves title in the settlor’s name and may cloud the trustee’s ability to manage or transfer the asset. A Heggstad petition can be filed to ask the court to recognize the property as trust-owned based on the settlor’s actions and intent, enabling the trustee to proceed with administration consistent with the trust terms.
Sometimes a property purchase was made using trust funds, but the title was not transferred into the trust’s name. Evidence such as payment records, escrow instructions, or loan documents showing trust fund usage can support a petition. When the seller or title company has not updated the recorded ownership, a Heggstad petition helps the court declare the asset as belonging to the trust. This judicial recognition allows trustees to manage or distribute the property in accordance with the trust, keeping the settlor’s plan intact and avoiding unnecessary probate.
Older documents or ambiguous conveyances can create uncertainty about whether property was intended to be trust-owned. Language in historic deeds or incomplete transfer paperwork sometimes fails to reflect the settlor’s ultimate intent. In such cases, the court will consider the totality of evidence to determine whether the asset should be treated as trust property. A Heggstad petition allows the probate court to interpret those documents and provide an authoritative determination that helps trustees proceed with clarity and confidence in administering the trust.
Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides local representation and guidance for residents of East Sonora and Tuolumne County facing trust funding and title issues. We assist trustees and families in assembling the documentation needed for a petition, preparing declarations, and navigating local court procedures. Our goal is to secure timely court rulings that clarify asset ownership so trustees can administer the trust and meet beneficiary expectations. We explain each step plainly, coordinate with title companies, and work to minimize delays in resolving trust funding matters.
Clients rely on our firm for practical, litigation-ready representation in trust funding matters that require court intervention. We bring focused legal preparation to each petition, assembling the necessary documentary support and drafting persuasive declarations that explain the settlor’s intent. Our team is experienced in communicating with county recorders, title companies, and opposing counsel to move matters forward efficiently. We emphasize clear client communication so trustees and beneficiaries understand timelines, potential outcomes, and steps needed to achieve clear title and orderly trust administration.
When title issues arise, delays can disrupt transactions and increase costs. We aim to reduce uncertainty by preparing thorough petitions and proposed orders that judges and title professionals can rely on. Our approach includes assessing alternatives, such as administrative corrections, and recommending the most effective path to resolve the specific issue at hand. For families and trustees in East Sonora, having a local law office that understands both the substantive law and the practical steps to correct title is a valuable asset during trust administration.
We also guide clients through coordination with third parties involved in property matters, including escrow officers, lenders, and title companies, to ensure the court’s order leads to recordable changes and reduced friction. Clear documentation and a court-approved determination help to restore confidence among all parties and permit trustees to fulfill their duties. For those managing sensitive family transitions, an orderly legal process provides peace of mind and helps preserve relationships while honoring the settlor’s plan.
Our process begins with a thorough review of the trust documents and any records related to the disputed asset. We identify necessary evidence, collect deeds, payment records, and correspondence, and prepare declarations from trustees or other witnesses. After assessing alternatives, we draft and file the petition with supporting exhibits and serve required parties in compliance with local rules. We then respond to any contest or inquiry, present the matter at a hearing if necessary, and work to obtain an order that facilitates recordation and clear administration of the asset under the trust.
The initial step focuses on evaluating the trust, the asset in question, and available documentary evidence. We request copies of the trust instrument, deeds, escrow records, closing statements, payment ledgers, and any communications demonstrating the settlor’s intent. This phase is critical for building a coherent narrative supported by documents that the court can review. We identify any missing records and advise on ways to obtain or reconstruct critical evidence to strengthen a petition and reduce the likelihood of contested proceedings.
We work with clients to locate and preserve relevant records that support the conclusion that an asset belongs to the trust. Preservation includes collecting closing documents, trust amendments, mortgage or payment records showing use of trust funds, and any communications reflecting the settlor’s intent. Early attention to these materials ensures the evidence is complete and organized, which improves the clarity and persuasiveness of a petition. Well-preserved records reduce surprises during the court review and help avoid evidentiary issues later in the case.
We analyze county recorder records and title reports to understand the recorded status of the property and any liens or encumbrances that may affect resolution. Identifying title defects early helps determine whether nonjudicial cures are possible or whether a petition is likely needed. Reviewing recorded documents provides context for the settlor’s transactions and can reveal missing conveyances or problematic language that the court will need to address. This analysis guides strategic decisions about the petition and subsequent steps for obtaining clear title.
Once evidence is compiled, we prepare the Heggstad petition, including detailed declarations and exhibits that explain why the asset should be treated as trust-owned. The petition is crafted to conform with local practice and includes a proposed order for the court to sign. Proper service on interested parties follows filing to satisfy procedural requirements. We closely monitor responses and are prepared to negotiate resolutions or proceed to hearing if necessary. Timely, complete filings increase the chances of a favorable judicial determination.
Declarations are central to a petition and should narrate the factual history supporting the settlor’s intent. We draft declarations that incorporate documentary evidence and coordinate with trustees or witnesses to present clear, credible statements. Well-crafted declarations reduce the need for extensive supplemental filings and make the petition easier for the court to evaluate. We ensure the narrative is consistent with attached exhibits, presenting a coherent story that links the trust’s terms with the disputed property’s history.
After filing the petition, we handle service on interested parties and prepare required proofs for the court. Compliance with local service rules and probate procedures is essential to avoid delays or procedural challenges. We track deadlines, respond to any objections, and work with clients to update records or obtain additional evidence if requested. Attention to procedural detail keeps the matter moving efficiently toward either negotiated resolution or a court hearing for final determination.
If a hearing is necessary, we present the petition and supporting evidence to the probate court and address any questions or objections that arise. When the court issues an order declaring the asset to be trust property, we assist in using that order to update county records, work with title companies, and complete transactions such as sales or transfers. Our goal is to ensure the court’s determination leads to practical results that allow trustees to administer the asset in accordance with the trust document and the settlor’s intent.
At hearing, we streamline the presentation to highlight the strongest documentary evidence and concise declarations that establish the settlor’s intent. We address any opposing arguments and emphasize legal principles that support treating the asset as trust property. The hearing is an opportunity to obtain a court order that will be respected by title companies and other third parties. Clear, well-organized presentation at the hearing promotes a favorable ruling and facilitates the next steps for record correction and trust administration.
Once a court order is obtained, we assist trustees in using that order to update public records, notify title insurers, and complete necessary transfers or sales. Implementing the court’s decision may include preparing recordable documents, forwarding certified orders to county recorders, and coordinating with escrow or lending partners. Prompt action after a successful petition turns judicial relief into practical outcomes, enabling trustees to manage or distribute the asset in accordance with the trust and minimizing any remaining administrative friction.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing that asks a judge to declare a specific asset to be part of a trust even though it was not formally transferred into the trust’s name. The petition presents evidence of the settlor’s intent and related documents such as trust instruments, deeds, payment records, and communications that support the conclusion that the property should be treated as trust-owned. The court’s order provides clarity for trustees, beneficiaries, and third parties such as title companies and lenders. Petitions are typically used when administrative remedies are insufficient to correct title or when third parties require judicial confirmation before accepting a change. The process brings finality by giving trustees a judicially authorized basis to proceed with transactions or distributions. While not every title issue requires a petition, it is a reliable remedy when definitive court action is needed to align recorded ownership with the settlor’s plan.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies depending on the complexity of the evidence, the number of parties to be served, and the court’s calendar. Preparation and document collection may take several weeks, particularly when records are older or dispersed. After filing and service, hearings can be scheduled within a matter of weeks in uncontested cases, but contested matters or additional evidentiary needs can extend the process to several months or longer depending on the local court docket. Prompt gathering of clear documentary evidence and cooperation among interested parties can shorten the timeline. Where third-party approvals or title company requirements are involved, additional coordination may be necessary to implement the court order. Clients should anticipate variability and plan for the administrative steps that follow a favorable ruling to update records and complete any transactions tied to the asset.
Support for a Heggstad petition commonly includes the trust document, deeds or purchase paperwork, closing statements, mortgage or payment records showing trust funds were used, and any writing or communications that reflect the settlor’s intention to include the asset in the trust. Declarations from trustees or witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s intent and the history of the transaction are often important. Together, these materials build the factual narrative the court will evaluate. In some cases, secondary evidence such as contemporaneous notes, bank records, or correspondence with title professionals can supplement gaps in primary documents. The more complete and organized the evidence, the more persuasive the petition. Preparing a structured evidentiary package reduces opportunities for procedural objections and helps the court reach a clear determination about trust ownership.
A Heggstad petition can help keep assets out of probate by securing a court order that recognizes property as trust-owned, which allows trustees to administer or transfer the asset under the trust’s terms. When the court declares an asset to be part of the trust, that judicial determination often satisfies title companies and lenders and prevents probate administration for that particular asset. However, complete avoidance of probate depends on the overall estate plan and whether other assets require probate for different reasons. While a successful petition can eliminate the need to probate a specific item, other factors such as creditor claims, additional untitled assets, or procedural issues may still require separate attention. It is important to assess the entire estate context to determine how a petition interacts with overall probate exposure and to pursue solutions that minimize public administration wherever feasible.
Parties to be notified typically include beneficiaries named in the trust, potential heirs at law, and any known creditors or interested third parties who may have a legal interest in the disputed asset. Proper service is essential to comply with local probate rules; failure to notify the required parties can lead to delays or require re-notification. Identifying all interested persons early helps ensure the petition proceeds without procedural defects and allows the court to consider any objections from those with standing. The exact list of required parties can vary depending on the facts and local practice, so careful review of the trust, the asset’s history, and potential claimants is necessary. When in doubt, filing counsel can help determine who must be noticed and assist with proper service to prevent challenges based on notice defects and to keep the petition on track toward resolution.
If someone contests a Heggstad petition, the court will consider the objections and may schedule additional proceedings to address factual disputes or evidentiary concerns. Contests can extend the timeline and increase costs, but a strong evidentiary showing often resolves the issues. Parties who object may present alternate interpretations of documents or challenge the sufficiency of the evidence; the court will weigh these arguments against the supporting material submitted by the petitioner. When a contest arises, resolving the dispute may involve mediation, additional declarations, or live testimony at a hearing. The goal is to achieve a judicial determination that reflects the settlor’s intent while protecting the rights of interested parties. Proper preparation and attention to potential objections at the outset can reduce the likelihood and scope of contested proceedings.
Title companies frequently accept a court order resulting from a successful Heggstad petition as evidence that the property should be treated as trust-owned, which allows them to insure transactions and facilitate recordation. Having a clear, well-supported order makes it much easier to update public records and obtain title insurance for sales or refinancing. However, acceptance may depend on the specifics of the order and the title insurer’s policies; some insurers request additional steps or documentation before issuing coverage. To maximize the order’s practical effect, petitions should include a proposed order tailored to facilitate recordation and to address common title insurer concerns. Coordination with the title company after obtaining the court order ensures the necessary recordable documents are prepared and processed, turning the court determination into a workable solution for transactions involving the property.
Heggstad petitions are a relatively common remedy where trusts are in widespread use but occasional administrative oversights occur. As estate plans age and properties change hands, instances arise where an item intended for trust ownership was never formally retitled. Probate courts are familiar with petitions that ask for recognition of trust ownership based on the settlor’s intent and supporting documentation. These petitions are part of the broader toolkit for trust administration and title correction. While they are not needed in every trust administration, petitions become important when administrative fixes are insufficient or when third parties demand judicial confirmation. Their frequency reflects practical realities of trust administration, and they remain a dependable option for resolving title issues and protecting the settlor’s plan while minimizing public probate involvement.
Costs for a Heggstad petition vary based on preparation time, complexity of the evidence, the number of parties to serve, and whether a hearing or contested proceedings are required. Expenses typically include filing fees, service costs, and legal fees for document review, drafting, and court appearances. In uncontested, straightforward matters, costs may be more moderate, while complex or contested petitions naturally incur higher fees due to additional preparation and litigation time. Discussing the anticipated scope at the outset helps set expectations and identify potential cost-saving measures, such as whether administrative record corrections are feasible. A clear plan for document gathering and early communication with involved parties can reduce unknowns and keep costs more predictable while still aiming for a durable resolution that aligns title with the trust.
To begin the process, collect the trust document, deeds, closing statements, payment records, and any other documents related to the asset. Contact the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for an initial consultation to review the materials and discuss the facts. We can evaluate whether a nonjudicial cure is possible or whether a Heggstad petition is the most reliable route to achieve clear title and orderly administration. Early evaluation helps identify missing records and the information needed to prepare a petition if required. After the initial review, we advise on the next steps for evidence gathering, draft the necessary declarations and exhibits, and outline the filing and service obligations. Prompt coordination with trustees, beneficiaries, and third parties supports efficient resolution. Taking these early steps sets the stage for a petition that clearly demonstrates the settlor’s intent and provides the court with the documentation needed to issue an effective order.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas