A Heggstad petition can be an essential step when a trust does not properly reflect the decedent’s intended distribution of assets or when assets were transferred to a trust but title was not changed correctly. In Mono Vista and surrounding Tuolumne County communities, families often discover issues during probate or trust administration that require court action to confirm that assets belong in a trust. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman focuses on helping clients resolve these title and transfer disputes carefully, explaining the Heggstad process and working to confirm the trust’s intended effect while minimizing delays and expense for beneficiaries and fiduciaries.
When a Heggstad petition is filed the court is asked to recognize that certain property should be treated as part of a decedent’s trust despite defects in formal transfer. This remedy is commonly used where there is clear evidence of the decedent’s intent to fund the trust but paperwork was incomplete or deeds were not updated. For residents of Mono Vista, addressing these matters promptly can prevent prolonged probate, reduce family conflict, and protect the orderly distribution of assets. Our approach is to gather documentation, prepare persuasive pleadings, and present the facts so the court can confirm the trust’s scope.
A Heggstad petition helps beneficiaries and trustees ensure that a decedent’s assets are treated consistent with the decedent’s trust terms even when formal title issues exist. This process can avoid full probate for assets intended to be in trust and provide clear judicial confirmation that the trust controls distribution. For families in Mono Vista, a successful petition reduces administrative delays, clarifies ownership of specific assets, and protects beneficiaries from disputes over property that should have been handled under the trust. Legal proceedings often require clear documentary and testimonial evidence, and timely action helps preserve witness recollections and documentation.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman has handled a broad range of estate planning and trust administration matters for clients across California, including Tuolumne County and Mono Vista. We assist with petitions seeking judicial confirmation of trust assets, trust modifications, and related estate administration filings. Our team prioritizes clear communication with families, careful preparation of trust documentation, and a pragmatic approach to court filings and negotiations. Clients receive straightforward guidance on evidence gathering, witness statements, and legal strategy aimed at resolving title disputes efficiently while honoring the decedent’s stated intentions.
A Heggstad petition is used when assets that the decedent intended to be held by a trust were not properly transferred into the trust’s name, often because deeds, account titles, or beneficiary designations were not updated. The petition asks the court to declare that those assets are trust property based on the decedent’s intent and actions taken during life. In Mono Vista and nearby communities, circumstances triggering a petition include recently discovered deeds, misplaced documents showing intent, or family members who can attest to the decedent’s expressed wishes. The petition helps avoid unnecessary probate by establishing trust ownership.
To succeed on a Heggstad petition the filing party typically must present evidence showing clear and convincing indications that the decedent intended the property to be in the trust. This may include written instructions, contemporaneous communications, deeds prepared for trust transfer, or credible witness testimony. Courts consider the totality of the circumstances to determine intent. While each situation is unique, careful documentation and early action increase the likelihood of a favorable resolution. For families, this proceeding offers a path to confirm the trust holds the assets the decedent intended to protect and distribute outside formal probate.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to recognize that property should be treated as part of a decedent’s trust despite imperfect formal transfer. The remedy is rooted in case law and is often pursued when assets have not been titled in the trust or when a transfer to the trust was incomplete. The petition provides a judicial declaration that the property belongs to the trust, enabling trustees to manage and distribute those assets under the trust’s terms. In practice, this means reducing the need for probate, clarifying title for third parties, and enabling beneficiaries to receive their intended distributions more quickly.
A Heggstad proceeding typically involves gathering documentary evidence, preparing a petition and supporting declarations, serving interested parties, and presenting the matter to the court for determination. Important elements include proof of the decedent’s intent to fund the trust, documentation of any attempted transfers, and corroborating statements from witnesses or professionals. Trustees and beneficiaries often work together to assemble deeds, trust documents, correspondence, and account records. The court evaluates the evidence and, if persuaded, issues an order declaring that the property is a trust asset, removing obstacles to administration and distribution under the trust terms.
Understanding common terms helps navigate a Heggstad petition. Typical definitions cover what it means to fund a trust, the role of a trustee, how title issues arise, and what judicial confirmation accomplishes. Familiarity with these concepts allows trustees and beneficiaries to collect relevant proof and articulate the decedent’s intent clearly. This section introduces practical definitions used in filings and hearings so clients in Mono Vista can better understand requests to the court and the types of evidence that support a successful declaration that assets are trust property.
Funding the trust refers to the act of transferring ownership of assets from an individual into the name of the trust so the trustee may manage and distribute them under the trust’s terms. Funding can include retitling real property, changing account ownership, or assigning contractual rights into the trust. A Heggstad petition often addresses situations where funding was intended but not completed. Evidence of intent to fund — such as deeds, transfer documents, or contemporaneous statements — is central to convincing a court to recognize assets as part of the trust despite formal defects.
A judicial declaration in the context of a Heggstad petition is a court order recognizing that specific assets should be treated as trust property based on the decedent’s intent and related actions. This declaration confirms that the trustee has legal control to manage and distribute the assets under the trust terms. When entered, the order helps clear title issues, allows trustees to act without starting probate, and provides legal certainty to financial institutions, title companies, and beneficiaries about ownership and authority to distribute assets according to the trust.
A trustee is the person or entity responsible for managing trust assets and carrying out the trust’s provisions after the grantor’s death or during incapacity. Fiduciary duties include acting in the best interests of beneficiaries, managing assets prudently, and following the trust’s terms. In Heggstad matters trustees may be tasked with gathering evidence, filing petitions, and representing the trust’s interests in court. Clear documentation and careful adherence to fiduciary duties help demonstrate the trust’s rightful ownership and support a favorable court determination.
Probate is the court-supervised process for administering a person’s estate when assets are not held in a trust or do not have designated beneficiaries. Trust administration generally proceeds without formal probate when assets are properly held in the trust. A Heggstad petition serves as a bridge when certain assets should be in the trust but title issues create obstacles. By obtaining a court declaration that those assets belong to the trust, trustees can avoid probate for those items and carry out distributions directly according to the trust’s terms.
When assets intended for a trust are improperly titled, families may consider different legal approaches including probate administration, informal settlement among heirs, or filing a Heggstad petition. Probate can be time-consuming and costly, while informal resolutions depend on cooperative heirs and clear evidence. A Heggstad petition provides a formal court process focused on confirming trust ownership based on intent and supporting facts. The best option depends on the strength of the evidence, the level of dispute among interested parties, the nature of the assets, and the desire to avoid probate for items meant to be in the trust.
A limited approach may suffice when documentary evidence and witness statements clearly show the decedent intended certain items to be in the trust and no interested party contests that intent. In such situations the parties can often agree to a short, focused petition that asks the court to confirm ownership of specific assets without broader litigation. Prompt collection of deeds, correspondence, and affidavits preserves the best record and can lead to an efficient judicial declaration, saving time and resources while ensuring assets are administered according to the decedent’s plans.
When beneficiaries and trustees are aligned and willing to cooperate, a narrow petition can resolve title issues quickly and with minimal conflict. Cooperation allows for joint filings, shared evidence, and agreed-upon orders that streamline the court’s work and reduce attorney time and expense. In Mono Vista families where relationships remain stable, the parties can often limit the scope of proceedings to only the assets with title defects, avoiding broader disputes that might otherwise require lengthy hearings or contested litigation.
A comprehensive approach is recommended when multiple assets across different ownership forms are affected or when title defects are complex and interrelated. In those circumstances careful coordination is needed to assemble deeds, account records, transfer documentation, and testimony to support a court declaration. A broader legal strategy can also address related matters such as trust modification petitions, creditor claims, or disputes over fiduciary authority. Taking time to build a comprehensive record reduces the chance of delayed outcomes and provides the court with clear context for declaring trust ownership.
When interested parties contest the decedent’s intent or when available evidence is inconsistent, a more complete legal review and preparation is important. Contested matters may require depositions, subpoenas for records, or evidentiary hearings to resolve disagreements. A comprehensive plan includes assessing witness availability, obtaining corroborating documentation, and preparing persuasive declarations and briefs for the court. This thorough preparation improves the likelihood of a favorable ruling and limits the risk that an incomplete record leaves title issues unresolved for years.
A comprehensive approach to Heggstad petitions can provide clarity across multiple assets, preserve evidence, and reduce the risk of future disputes. By reviewing all potentially affected accounts and deeds, trustees and beneficiaries gain a complete picture of what requires confirmation. Preparing a full evidentiary record helps ensure that the court can make a definitive ruling, which in turn simplifies administration and distribution under the trust. Families benefit from coordinated communication, fewer surprises during settlement, and reduced potential for later litigation over assets thought to be transferred to the trust.
Comprehensive preparation also helps third parties such as banks and title companies accept the court order without requesting additional steps. When the court issues an order declaring trust ownership, financial institutions are more likely to recognize trustee authority and release assets for administration and distribution. This reduces administrative friction, avoids duplicate filings, and shortens the time needed to manage or distribute assets to beneficiaries. The result is smoother trust administration and confidence that the decedent’s plan will be followed as intended.
A thorough approach yields a stronger evidentiary record, which supports definitive court orders recognizing trust ownership. Clear orders reduce ambiguity for trustees and third parties, allowing assets to be managed and distributed without repeated court involvement. Gathering comprehensive documentation, such as deeds, written instructions, and witness declarations, helps the court understand the totality of the decedent’s intent. For families in Mono Vista, this means less administrative back-and-forth and more predictable, timely resolution of trust administration tasks.
Comprehensive preparation reduces the chance that unresolved title issues will lead to future disputes among beneficiaries or third parties. When the court addresses all contested or uncertain assets together, it limits the opportunity for later challenges that could restart legal proceedings. A cohesive strategy can also mitigate delays caused by missing documentation or conflicting records. By addressing the broad range of potential problems up front, trustees and families avoid repetitive filings and administrative complications that prolong distribution and create added cost and stress.
Early document collection makes a significant difference when preparing a Heggstad petition. Gather deeds, trust documents, beneficiary designations, statements, and any written notes or communications that indicate the decedent’s intent to place assets into the trust. Speak with family members or professionals who may recall conversations or actions taken by the decedent. The more complete the record, the more persuasive the petition will be to the court. Early action also preserves witness memories and prevents delays that can complicate administration and distribution under the trust.
Preserve witness statements and other evidence that shows the decedent’s intention to fund the trust. Witness recollections can fade and documents can become misplaced over time, so documenting recollections in writing and securing copies of relevant paperwork is important. Declarations from those who observed the decedent’s planning steps, attorneys or advisors involved in drafting papers, and any contemporaneous notes strengthen the record. A clear, well-documented narrative of the decedent’s actions and intent improves the chances of the court recognizing assets as part of the trust.
A Heggstad petition is appropriate when assets were intended for a trust but were not formally transferred, when surviving family members wish to avoid probate for those assets, or when title discrepancies could impede administration. This proceeding can short-circuit probate for certain property and provide a judicial declaration that the trustee has authority over specified assets. For individuals and families in Mono Vista, filing a petition protects the decedent’s plan and helps ensure smoother administration by clarifying ownership and enabling trustees to manage and distribute assets consistent with the trust’s terms.
Families should also consider a Heggstad petition when there is uncertainty about whether certain accounts or properties were meant to be held by the trust, when deeds were prepared but not completed, or when paperwork was left incomplete at the time of death. A court declaration can prevent later disputes, reduce administrative burdens, and allow beneficiaries to receive distributions more quickly. Taking action promptly preserves evidence and witness recollections, which strengthens the petition and shortens the overall timeline for resolving trust administration matters.
Typical circumstances include when a grantor prepared a deed or transfer instrument but never recorded it, when bank or brokerage accounts were not retitled to the trust, when property deeds list the individual rather than the trust, or when changes to beneficiary designations were not completed. Other situations involve recently discovered documents indicating intent to fund the trust or contested claims by heirs who dispute ownership. In these circumstances a Heggstad petition provides a formal route to clarify ownership and enable trust administration without unnecessary probate.
When real property intended for the trust remains titled in the decedent’s name a Heggstad petition can help the court recognize the property as trust-owned based on the decedent’s intent. Evidence can include prepared but unrecorded deeds, correspondence with a title company, or testimony from professionals involved in estate planning. By securing a court declaration, trustees can avoid probate for that property and proceed with managing or distributing it under the trust’s terms, providing clarity to buyers, title companies, and beneficiaries.
Bank or investment accounts that were to be transferred to a trust but remain in the decedent’s name create obstacles for trustees. A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize the intent to fund the trust so that those accounts can be administered without probate. Documentation such as account statements, written instructions, or communication with financial institutions can establish the decedent’s plan. Court recognition facilitates transfer or distribution under the trust and reduces delays caused by title inconsistencies or institutional holdbacks.
Situations where transfer paperwork was drafted but not completed—such as an unrecorded deed, unsigned transfer forms, or missing beneficiary updates—often lead to Heggstad petitions. Courts examine the full context, including written intentions, preparatory documents, and witness statements to determine whether the decedent meant those assets to be part of the trust. A successful petition resolves the uncertainty, allowing trustees to proceed with administration and distribution in accordance with the decedent’s expressed wishes.
If you are dealing with title defects or assets that were intended for a trust but not properly transferred, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can help guide you through the Heggstad petition process in Mono Vista. We assist trustees, beneficiaries, and family representatives with evidence gathering, preparing the petition and declarations, and coordinating filings in Tuolumne County. Our goal is to secure a clear court ruling that allows trustees to manage and distribute assets under the trust and to minimize delay and cost during administration.
Clients choose the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman because we provide practical, focused representation for trust and estate matters. We assist clients in identifying the right legal path, assembling the necessary documentation, and presenting the strongest factual record to the court. Our approach is to explain options clearly, outline the expected timeline, and work collaboratively with trustees and beneficiaries to achieve a timely resolution. For Mono Vista residents, local knowledge of Tuolumne County court procedures is an advantage during filings and hearings.
Our firm helps clients evaluate whether a Heggstad petition or alternate remedy is most appropriate, taking into account the nature of the assets, the strength of the evidence, and the positions of interested parties. We prepare tailored pleadings and supporting declarations and communicate with financial institutions and title companies as needed to facilitate post-order transfers. Clear communication with family members is emphasized to reduce conflict and streamline the court process where possible, allowing the trust administration to proceed efficiently.
We also assist with related probate and trust matters such as trust modification petitions, trust certification requests, and other filings that may accompany a Heggstad petition. Our objective is to provide a complete service that addresses title issues while keeping the family’s goals central to the process. By combining documentary preparation, court filing experience, and attentive client communication we help clients navigate what can otherwise be a confusing and time-consuming process.
Our process begins with a careful review of the trust, related documents, and any evidence that shows the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. We identify the assets at issue, gather deeds, account records, correspondence, and witness statements, and advise on the appropriate petition strategy. Next we prepare the petition, supporting declarations, and supporting exhibits tailored to Tuolumne County practice. We file and serve the petition and represent the trust during any hearings, working to obtain a court order that clarifies ownership so administration can proceed efficiently under the trust’s terms.
The first step involves a detailed intake and document review to identify assets that may require court confirmation and to assess the evidence available to demonstrate intent. We ask clients to provide trust documents, deeds, account records, correspondence, and any drafts or notes suggesting a transfer to the trust. We also determine which parties must be notified or served. This initial assessment shapes whether a Heggstad petition is the best route and identifies any additional steps necessary to support the petition in court.
We work with you to identify all property that may have been intended for the trust, including real property, accounts, and contractual interests. Collecting deeds, account statements, and transfer documents is a priority. We also look for preparatory documents such as unrecorded deeds or correspondence with advisors that demonstrate intent. A complete inventory helps us prepare an organized petition and ensures the court receives a thorough record supporting the request to recognize assets as trust property.
We interview family members, advisors, and others who can corroborate the decedent’s intent and actions. Written declarations from these witnesses are prepared to accompany the petition, providing the court with first-hand accounts of conversations, document preparation, and actions taken toward funding the trust. Timely collection of these statements is important because memories and available documents can fade over time. Corroborating testimony strengthens the petition and supports a clear judicial declaration.
After assembling the evidence, we draft a petition that outlines the facts, identifies the assets at issue, and requests the court to declare the assets part of the trust. Supporting declarations and exhibits are organized to present a persuasive, comprehensive record. We then file the petition with the appropriate Tuolumne County court, serve required parties, and monitor response deadlines. Proper pleading format and thorough supporting documentation increase the chance the court will grant a clear order confirming trust ownership.
Drafting involves preparing a concise petition and persuasive declarations that document the decedent’s intent and the nature of the title defects. Exhibits such as deeds, account statements, and correspondence are attached in an orderly fashion to make the facts easy for the court to review. We ensure procedural requirements are met for filing and service and prepare an explanation of the law supporting a Heggstad declaration so the judge has a complete record to render an informed decision.
Once the petition is filed we serve interested parties and address any responses or objections. If disputes arise, we prepare responsive declarations and proposed orders to clarify the factual record and the requested relief. Our goal is to resolve objections through documentation and negotiation when possible, and to present the strongest possible case at hearing if disputes remain. Efficient handling of responses helps expedite the court’s consideration of the petition.
The final step is the court’s review and determination. If evidence is uncontroverted the court may grant the petition on the papers; if contested, a hearing allows presentation of declarations and testimony. The judge evaluates the totality of the evidence and decides whether to issue an order declaring the assets trust property. After the order is entered we assist with providing certified copies and coordinating with institutions to implement the order so trustees can manage and distribute the assets according to the trust.
At hearing we present a clear record of the decedent’s intent and any corroborating documents and statements. If witnesses are needed, we prepare declarations and coordinate testimony consistent with court procedure. Our objective is to help the judge understand why the assets should be recognized as part of the trust and how the requested order serves the decedent’s plan while protecting beneficiaries’ interests. A clear presentation increases the likelihood of a definitive ruling.
After the court issues an order declaring ownership, we provide certified copies to banks, title companies, and other custodians to facilitate recognition of trustee authority. We assist trustees with the administrative tasks required to transfer accounts or change title consistent with the order and advise on next steps for trust administration and distribution. Efficient post-order implementation helps ensure assets are administered under the trust terms without further delay.
A Heggstad petition is a legal filing that asks the probate court to declare that specific property should be treated as part of a decedent’s trust despite defects in formal transfer. It is commonly used when deeds, account titles, or other transfer steps were not completed but there is evidence the decedent intended those assets to be held by the trust. The petition presents evidence of intent and supporting documentation so the court can issue an order recognizing trust ownership and allowing trustees to manage and distribute the assets under the trust’s terms. This remedy addresses situations where the decedent attempted or intended to fund a trust but title issues created uncertainty. The petition helps avoid unnecessary probate for those items by establishing that they are part of the trust. The strength of the petition depends on the available evidence, such as unrecorded deeds, written instructions, correspondence, and witness statements that show the decedent’s planning steps and intentions prior to death.
A Heggstad petition differs from probate because it focuses on confirming that certain assets were intended to be held by a trust, allowing those assets to be administered under the trust rather than through probate court. Probate is the formal court process for distributing assets that are not otherwise transferred by trust or beneficiary designation. When a Heggstad petition is granted the court declares trust ownership, which often removes the need to include those particular assets in probate administration and speeds distribution to beneficiaries under the trust. Probate may still be necessary for other assets that were not intended for the trust or for disputes unrelated to trust ownership. The decision to pursue a Heggstad petition versus probate administration depends on the nature of the assets, the available evidence of intent, and whether interested parties are cooperative or contesting the matter. Evaluating the facts early helps determine the most efficient path.
Supporting evidence for a Heggstad petition typically includes trust documents, drafts or unrecorded deeds, account statements, correspondence with advisors, and declarations from witnesses who can attest to the decedent’s intent. Written materials showing attempts to transfer property to the trust or instructions to professionals are particularly helpful. Court decisions look at the totality of the circumstances, so multiple forms of corroboration tend to strengthen the petition and make it more persuasive when reviewed by a judge. Declarations from family members, attorneys, or financial advisors who recall the decedent’s statements or actions are commonly used to fill gaps in documentary evidence. The timeliness of collecting these statements matters because memories fade and documents can become harder to locate. Careful organization and presentation of the evidence improve the likelihood of a favorable court ruling recognizing the assets as trust property.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies depending on the complexity of the title issues, the number of assets involved, whether the petition is contested, and the court’s schedule. Simple, uncontested petitions supported by clear documentation may be resolved in a matter of weeks to a few months once the petition is filed and served. Contested matters or cases requiring additional discovery can take longer, potentially several months to a year or more, depending on the need for hearings and the availability of witnesses and records. Preparing a complete petition and collecting supporting declarations before filing can shorten the court’s review time and reduce the likelihood of continuances. Working closely with institutions and interested parties to address objections early also helps streamline the process. The local court calendar and service requirements in Tuolumne County will influence how quickly a hearing can be scheduled and a final order entered.
A Heggstad petition can avoid probate for the specific assets that the court declares are trust property, but it does not necessarily prevent probate for other assets that are not addressed by the petition. If all significant assets intended for the trust are included and the court grants the petition, trustees can administer those assets under the trust without opening probate for them. However, assets outside the trust or disputes unrelated to trust ownership may still require probate proceedings. Whether probate is avoided in the broader estate depends on the completeness of the trust funding and the existence of other nontrust assets. Filing a Heggstad petition is a targeted remedy to confirm ownership for specific items; it does not automatically resolve unrelated estate administration matters.
Interested parties who must be notified when filing a Heggstad petition typically include beneficiaries of the trust, heirs who might have an interest in the decedent’s estate, trustees, and any parties with recorded interests in the affected property. Proper notice ensures that those with potential claims have an opportunity to respond and protects the validity of the court’s final order. Local court rules and probate procedure outline specific service requirements and timelines that must be followed to proceed with the petition. If parties cannot be located after reasonable efforts, the court may permit alternative methods of notice. Ensuring accurate and complete service is important to avoid later challenges to the court’s declaration. Our firm assists clients in identifying affected parties and completing the necessary notice and service steps under Tuolumne County procedures.
Yes, beneficiaries or heirs can contest a Heggstad petition if they dispute the decedent’s intent or question the evidence supporting trust ownership. Contests may allege that the decedent did not intend the assets to be in the trust or that the documentation is unreliable. When a petition is contested the court may require additional evidence, take testimony, and schedule a hearing to resolve conflicting accounts. Contested matters generally require more extensive preparation and can extend the timeline for obtaining a final order. Even when a petition is contested, many disputes are resolved through negotiation or by submitting additional supporting declarations and documentation. Preparing a thorough evidentiary record and responding promptly to objections improves the chance of resolving disputes without prolonged litigation. Court procedures and local rules govern how contests proceed, and compliance with those rules is important to protecting the trust’s position.
If the court denies a Heggstad petition, the assets in question may remain subject to probate or further litigation to determine ownership. A denial may result from insufficient evidence of intent, unresolved disputes among interested parties, or procedural defects in the filing. When a petition is denied, parties may consider gathering additional evidence, addressing procedural deficiencies, or exploring other legal remedies such as probate administration or settlement negotiations to resolve ownership and distribution issues. After a denial, it is important to evaluate the court’s reasons and consider next steps promptly to protect asset values and preserve witness recollections. In some cases, supplemental filings or negotiated resolutions can still achieve the decedent’s objectives without prolonged court involvement. Careful planning after a denial helps prevent further delays and supports moving forward with administration.
The cost to file a Heggstad petition varies depending on the complexity of the matter, the amount of evidence required, whether the petition is contested, and local filing fees. Simple, uncontested petitions supported by clear documentation may incur lower attorney time and costs, while contested matters with multiple assets or complex title issues will require more extensive preparation, potentially increasing fees. Court filing and service fees are additional costs that should be anticipated in the overall budget for the matter. We provide an initial assessment to estimate anticipated steps and potential cost ranges based on the facts of each case. In many matters, early organization and evidence gathering reduce time in court and associated fees. Discussing budget concerns openly during the intake process helps tailor the approach to meet both legal needs and financial considerations.
A court may consider related trust modification or other trust-related relief in the same proceeding if the issues are properly pleaded and relevant to resolving ownership or administration questions. However, separate legal standards and notice requirements may apply for modification petitions, and combining requests should be done with careful procedural planning. Courts will assess whether combining matters serves judicial economy and whether all interested parties have been properly notified and given an opportunity to be heard. When multiple types of relief are needed, we evaluate whether to file separate petitions or include related requests in a single filing. The choice depends on the complexity of the issues, local court preferences, and the need to ensure that all procedural protections and notice requirements are satisfied for interested parties.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas