A Heggstad petition can be an essential tool for those who discover property that should properly be part of a decedent’s trust but was mistakenly titled in another name. Residents of Phoenix Lake and surrounding parts of Tuolumne County often encounter this issue when estate assets were not retitled into a trust before death. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman in San Jose, we help clients understand when a petition may be appropriate and how it fits into a broader estate planning framework. This page outlines what a Heggstad petition is and how it can resolve conveyancing gaps involving trust administration.
This guide explains the procedural steps, typical evidence needed, and potential outcomes when filing a petition to have property declared part of a decedent’s trust. Phoenix Lake property owners and trustees frequently need clarity about whether informal transfer documents, beneficiary designations, or other instruments can be recognized by the court as evidence that assets should be in the trust. We also describe practical options to prevent future problems and how to coordinate a petition with related estate documents such as living trusts, pour-over wills, and trust certifications. Phone consultation availability is provided for those near San Jose and Tuolumne County.
A Heggstad petition can protect the trust beneficiaries’ interests and streamline estate settlement by asking a court to confirm that an asset belongs to the decedent’s trust despite irregular title. In Phoenix Lake cases, this can prevent protracted disputes, reduce administrative delays, and help trustees distribute assets according to the trust’s terms rather than through intestate processes. The petition often clarifies ownership for real property, bank accounts, or other titled assets and can be paired with trust administration steps such as certification of trust or pour-over wills. Thoughtful use of this remedy preserves value and respects the decedent’s documented intentions.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and trust administration services with a focus on practical, client-centered representation. From our San Jose base we assist clients across California, including Phoenix Lake and Tuolumne County, with petitions and trust-related court actions. When handling a potential Heggstad petition, we emphasize careful fact gathering, coordinated document review, and clear communication with trustees, beneficiaries, and courts. Our approach prioritizes efficient resolution while protecting client interests, whether that means obtaining a court declaration, negotiating a settlement among interested parties, or advising on follow-up trust administration tasks.
A Heggstad petition is filed in probate court to address situations where an asset that should be trust property remains titled outside the trust at the time of the settlor’s death. The petition asks the court to find that the asset was intended to be part of the trust, often based on deeds, transfer documents, beneficiary designations, and surrounding circumstances. In Phoenix Lake, where property ownership and family dynamics can be complex, petition filings require careful documentation and an understanding of California probate and trust law to persuade the court that the decedent’s intent was to place the asset in the trust.
Successful petitions depend on credible evidence showing the decedent intended the asset to be trust property, which can include signed but unrecorded transfer instruments, correspondence indicating intent, or contemporaneous trust-related documents. The process typically involves preparing a petition, providing notice to interested parties, possible hearings, and obtaining a court order that clarifies title. For trustees and beneficiaries in Phoenix Lake, this process can remove uncertainty and allow the trustee to manage and distribute assets as the trust prescribes, avoiding title disputes and facilitating smoother estate administration.
A Heggstad petition requests that the probate court declare an asset to be part of a trust despite imperfect or missing title transfer. It is commonly used when deeds were not recorded, account ownership was not retitled, or other procedural steps were overlooked before the settlor’s death. The petition presents evidence of the decedent’s intent and may reference trust terms such as the pour-over will, general assignment of assets to trust, or certification of trust. The court then issues a determination that allows the trustee to treat the asset as trust property for administration and distribution purposes.
Filing a Heggstad petition begins with gathering documentary evidence that links the asset to the trust and demonstrates the decedent’s intent. Common elements include deeds, unrecorded transfer forms, trust provisions, witness declarations, and related estate planning documents like wills, powers of attorney, or HIPAA authorizations. The process continues with drafting a petition and proposed order, serving notice to heirs and interested parties, and attending court proceedings as required. Effective petitions anticipate potential objections and supply sufficient proof to secure a court ruling recognizing trust ownership.
Understanding common terms can make the Heggstad petition process more accessible. Definitions clarify the roles of trustees and beneficiaries, the significance of trust certifications, the purpose of a pour-over will, and the implications of general assignments to trust. Recognizing how instruments like a revocable living trust, pour-over will, and certification of trust interact helps trustees and family members gather the right documents. This glossary provides straightforward explanations to demystify the legal language and support informed decision-making during trust administration and potential court petitions.
A revocable living trust is a written arrangement created during a person’s lifetime that holds assets for the benefit of named beneficiaries. The settlor retains control and can amend or revoke the trust while alive, which often helps avoid probate and provides continuity in asset management upon incapacity or death. When property was intended to be conveyed into such a trust but remains titled elsewhere, a Heggstad petition may be used to correct that oversight. The trust document typically names successor trustees and specifies distribution instructions to guide post-death administration.
A pour-over will is a testamentary document designed to transfer any assets remaining in a decedent’s name into their trust upon death. It functions as a safety net to ensure assets not previously retitled into the trust are directed to it for administration according to its terms. In cases where a pour-over will exists but title is still inconsistent, a Heggstad petition can help demonstrate that the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust. The pour-over will works together with trust documents to effectuate the settlor’s overall estate plan.
A certification of trust is a shortened summary of a trust used to prove the trust’s existence and the authority of the trustee without disclosing private provisions. It often provides verification for banks, title companies, and other institutions that a trustee has authority to manage trust assets. When filing a Heggstad petition, a certification of trust may be submitted to confirm trust terms and trustee powers. This document helps streamline interactions with third parties while preserving confidentiality of the full trust instrument.
A general assignment of assets to trust is a document intended to transfer ownership of certain assets into a trust, either during life or at death, by identifying the assets and assigning them to the trust. When an assignment was prepared but not properly recorded or completed, the trustee may pursue a Heggstad petition to establish that the asset was intended to be part of the trust. This instrument supports the assertion of trust ownership by providing direct evidence of the settlor’s intent to include specified property within the trust estate.
When confronted with property that appears to belong to a trust but lacks proper title, several options exist. A Heggstad petition seeks a judicial declaration to resolve title questions, while informal negotiations or corrective deeds may resolve some matters without court involvement. For bank accounts, beneficiary designations or small estate procedures might offer alternative routes. Each option has trade-offs in terms of time, cost, and certainty. In Phoenix Lake, selecting the most effective path requires assessing the asset type, available evidence, interested parties, and the client’s goals for timely distribution and minimizing conflict.
In some cases, minor title corrections or administrative actions can resolve asset placement issues without court intervention. If a deed was signed but not recorded, parties may be able to record corrective documents or obtain a notarized affidavit to present to the title company. Bank or brokerage accounts often respond to certification of trust or beneficiary designation corrections. These less formal approaches reduce legal costs and time but depend on cooperative institutions and willing parties. For Phoenix Lake residents, addressing the issue early increases the chance a limited approach will succeed without filing a formal petition.
A limited approach can work when there is clear documentation and agreement among heirs, trustees, and beneficiaries about the decedent’s intent. When all interested parties consent to corrective transfers, the need for judicial approval may be avoided. This route is often faster and less adversarial, preserving family relationships and conserving estate funds. However, when disagreements arise or an institution refuses to accept corrective documents, a court petition may become necessary to obtain an authoritative ruling that resolves title confusion and enables the trustee to proceed with confidence.
Comprehensive legal action, including filing a Heggstad petition, becomes necessary when there are contested claims to an asset or unclear documentation that prompts disagreements among heirs or third parties. Court involvement offers an authoritative decision that clarifies ownership and prevents ongoing disputes over trust distributions. In Phoenix Lake matters where competing claims exist, a thorough legal approach gathers evidence, manages notice requirements, and presents the strongest case to the probate court. This level of service aims to secure a clear resolution and ensure assets are administered according to the trust.
When title histories are complex, such as multiple transfers, liens, or unclear beneficiary designations, institutions like banks or title companies may resist retitling assets without a court order. A comprehensive approach addresses these obstacles by preparing thorough evidentiary support, coordinating with institutions, and seeking a judicial declaration when necessary. This strategy is particularly helpful in Phoenix Lake cases involving real estate, retirement accounts, or insurance trusts where records are fragmented. The goal is to overcome institutional hurdles and achieve a legally binding determination of trust ownership.
A comprehensive petition strategy delivers legal certainty by obtaining a court order that confirms ownership of disputed assets for trust administration. This reduces the risk of future litigation, clarifies trustee authority, and helps ensure that distributions follow the settlor’s documented wishes. For families in Phoenix Lake, a court determination can resolve lingering questions about asset allocation and enable trustees to act without fear of later disputes. The comprehensive path may require more time initially but often prevents prolonged conflict and provides a definitive resolution that preserves estate value.
Another advantage of a comprehensive approach is the coordinated review of related estate planning documents to identify and correct procedural gaps. This review can reveal items like missing general assignments to trust, unrecorded deeds, or incomplete beneficiary designations that need attention. By addressing these matters in the context of a petition, trustees and families can create a complete record that supports administration, reduces administrative burdens, and facilitates timely distributions. The outcome is a smoother trust administration process and increased predictability for beneficiaries.
A court order obtained through a Heggstad petition provides legal finality, helping to minimize the chance of future claims that could disrupt distribution or diminish estate value. When a judge formally recognizes property as trust assets, trustees gain confidence to manage or transfer the assets according to the trust. This finality protects beneficiaries and can prevent time-consuming rehearings or contests. For Phoenix Lake families concerned about post-distribution challenges, a formal judicial determination is often the most reliable mechanism to secure an enduring resolution.
By obtaining a judicial declaration, trustees can clear title issues and work with title companies, banks, and other institutions to retitle or transfer assets into the trust estate. This streamlines administration and minimizes delays in liquidating or distributing assets as directed by the trust. The resulting clarity expedites necessary transactions and reduces administrative friction. In Phoenix Lake, where real property and community assets may be significant, resolving title issues through a petition helps complete estate matters efficiently and in accordance with the settlor’s intentions.
Begin by gathering all estate planning documents, deeds, bank statements, trust certificates, and any unrecorded assignments that could show the decedent intended the asset to be in the trust. Early, thorough document collection helps identify whether a petition is likely to succeed and limits delays during the court process. For Phoenix Lake matters, obtaining copies of the trust instrument, pour-over will, and any correspondence about asset transfers can strengthen your position. Prompt collection also facilitates clear communication with trustees, beneficiaries, and institutions that may require documentation before accepting changes in title.
Banks, title companies, and other institutions have specific protocols for accepting trust-related documentation, and they may require a certification of trust, court order, or other forms before retitling assets. Anticipating these requirements by confirming required documents and preparing certified copies saves time and prevents repeated requests. When a court order is necessary, coordinating with institutions in advance clarifies what the court must address. For Phoenix Lake trustees, proactive preparation of documents and understanding institutional policies can reduce back-and-forth and keep the administration process moving efficiently.
You should consider a Heggstad petition when an asset plainly intended for the trust remains in the decedent’s name or another title at the time of death, and informal remedies are unavailable or have failed. Common triggers include unrecorded deeds, assets omitted from retitling, or inconsistencies between account records and trust documentation. Filing a petition helps protect beneficiary rights, ensures the asset is managed under the trust terms, and prevents distribution through unintended channels. This remedy is particularly relevant for property-rich estates or when clear documentation of intent exists but procedural steps were incomplete.
Another reason to pursue a petition is when institutions refuse to accept trust documentation without a court order or when heirs dispute whether an asset belongs in the trust. The petition offers a formal mechanism to resolve disputes and compel institutions to recognize trust ownership. In the Phoenix Lake area, where title and property matters may involve multiple parties or complex histories, obtaining a judicial declaration provides authoritative clarity that supports trustee actions and beneficiary distributions in alignment with the settlor’s plan.
Typical circumstances include a deed that was prepared but not recorded, bank or brokerage accounts that were not retitled into the trust, or assets transferred informally that lack formal documentation. Situations also arise when a transfer on death designation lapses or is inconsistent with the trust’s terms, or when beneficiaries dispute the intended ownership. In each scenario, the Heggstad petition serves to demonstrate the settlor’s intent and obtain a legal determination that the asset is part of the trust so the trustee can proceed with administration and distribution.
Unrecorded or defective deeds are a frequent cause of title confusion that may necessitate a petition. If a deed was signed but not recorded, or if the transfer omitted necessary legal formalities, the asset may remain in the decedent’s name on public records even though the parties intended it to be trust property. A Heggstad petition can present evidence of the transfer intent and ask the court to declare the property part of the trust, enabling the trustee to remedy the public record and proceed with trust administration without prolonged uncertainty.
Financial accounts, retirement plan designations, or insurance policies that were not retitled into the trust can create gaps in the estate plan that require court action. When accounts remain in the decedent’s individual name, institutions may refuse to honor trust instructions. A Heggstad petition can establish that these accounts were intended for the trust so the trustee can demand appropriate transfers or distributions. This step often requires careful evidence gathering and coordination with financial institutions to clear the path for trust administration and beneficiary entitlements.
When heirs or other interested parties dispute whether an asset should be trust property, a Heggstad petition provides a legal forum to resolve the conflict. The court evaluates the evidence and issues a determination that clarifies ownership and reduces the potential for future litigation. For families in Phoenix Lake, where relationships and property interests may be intertwined, the petition process aims to produce a binding resolution so trustees can manage and distribute assets in line with the decedent’s plan without ongoing uncertainty or adversarial disputes.
If you are facing title issues or have discovered assets that should be in a trust, local representation can help navigate Tuolumne County procedures and court practices. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients in Phoenix Lake by reviewing documents, advising on potential approaches, and preparing petitions when necessary. We help trustees and families assess evidence, communicate with institutions, and pursue the path that most effectively protects beneficiary interests and honors the decedent’s intentions while complying with California probate and trust rules.
Clients choose a law firm for representation in Heggstad petition matters because they want careful document review, thoughtful strategy, and experienced court practice. Our firm focuses on clear communication with trustees and beneficiaries, meticulous preparation of petitions and supporting declarations, and proactive coordination with title companies and financial institutions. We aim to provide realistic assessments of likely outcomes and to pursue solutions that balance efficiency with legal thoroughness, helping families in Phoenix Lake resolve title issues and proceed with trust administration.
When preparing a petition, attention to evidentiary details and notice requirements matters. We work to compile the paperwork that demonstrates the settlor’s intent, prepare proposed orders for the court, and provide timely updates to clients throughout the process. Our approach includes exploring less formal resolutions when appropriate and pursuing court declarations when those paths are unavailable. For trustees concerned about potential disputes or institutional resistance, our representation seeks to minimize delay and secure clear authority to act on behalf of the trust.
Beyond the petition itself, we help clients consider follow-up steps such as recording corrected deeds, updating account registrations, and making any necessary trust modifications. Our practice includes assistance with related documents like certifications of trust, pour-over wills, and general assignments, so that title issues are resolved and the trust administration is completed efficiently. For Phoenix Lake residents and families across Tuolumne County, this coordinated approach fosters smoother transitions and helps ensure assets are distributed according to the trust’s provisions.
Our process begins with an initial document review and case assessment to determine if a petition is likely to achieve the desired outcome. We then gather supporting evidence, prepare the petition and proposed orders, and coordinate service on interested parties. If a hearing is required, we advocate for a favorable ruling by presenting the factual record and legal arguments developed during the review. After court approval, we assist with any necessary recording, retitling, or follow-up actions so the trustee can administer the asset under the trust terms without further delay.
The first step focuses on collecting all relevant materials such as the trust document, deeds, account statements, and any written evidence of the decedent’s intent. We review pour-over wills, certifications of trust, and general assignments to identify the strongest path forward. This phase also includes identifying interested parties and determining notice requirements under California law. A thorough initial assessment helps shape filing strategy, anticipate potential objections, and estimate likely timelines and costs so clients in Phoenix Lake know what to expect.
Collecting comprehensive documentary evidence is fundamental to a successful petition. Documents such as unrecorded deeds, correspondence showing intent to transfer assets to the trust, bank records, and trust certifications can all support the claim. We guide clients on how to obtain certified copies and coordinate with title companies or financial institutions to retrieve necessary records. Well-organized evidence strengthens the petition and clarifies the timeline of events leading to the decedent’s intent to include specific assets in the trust.
Identifying all interested parties is a required step and includes beneficiaries, heirs, creditors, and others with potential claims. Proper notice must be given according to probate rules to ensure the court can proceed. We prepare the necessary service documents and manage statutory timelines so that the petition complies with California procedures. Accurate identification and notice prevent delays and reduce the risk of later challenges based on improper service or inadequate disclosures during the court process.
The drafting stage involves preparing the petition, declarations, exhibits, and a proposed order for the court. We craft clear factual narratives supported by exhibits to demonstrate the decedent’s intent and the legal basis for recognizing the asset as trust property. Attention to the court’s formatting and filing requirements ensures smooth processing. After filing, we manage publication or direct service obligations, respond to inquiries from the court or opposing parties, and coordinate any settlement discussions that may arise before a hearing.
Declarations from trustees, witnesses, or professionals can be pivotal to establishing the circumstances around a transfer or intent to include an asset in the trust. We prepare declarations that describe relevant conversations, document custody, and timeline details, and append corroborating exhibits such as drafts, correspondence, or transaction records. Clear, well-supported declarations help the court evaluate the evidence and make a determination that reflects the settlor’s intentions.
After drafting is complete, we file the petition with the appropriate probate court in Tuolumne County and ensure all interested parties receive proper notice. Filing triggers statutory response periods and potential hearings. We track deadlines, file required proof of service, and communicate with the court clerk to monitor scheduling. If objections are filed, we review and address them through negotiation or court briefing, always keeping client objectives at the forefront of any resolution strategy.
If a hearing is required, we present the evidence and arguments to the court and request a formal order recognizing the asset as part of the trust. Once the court grants the petition, we assist with implementing the order by recording deeds, updating account registrations, and coordinating with title or financial institutions to reflect trust ownership. This post-order work ensures that the court’s decision results in practical changes to title and accounts so the trustee can administer and distribute assets in accordance with the trust terms.
During a hearing, the court examines the submitted declarations, exhibits, and any testimony to determine whether the evidence supports inclusion of the asset in the trust. We present a concise narrative tied to documentary proof so the judge can clearly see the decedent’s intent and the legal basis for the declaration. Effective courtroom presentation helps the court reach a well-reasoned decision, reducing the likelihood of future disputes and enabling trustees to proceed with administration based on a definitive ruling.
After obtaining a court order, we coordinate the practical steps necessary to reflect trust ownership in public records and institutional accounts. This often includes recording corrected deeds, providing certified copies of the order to banks or title companies, and filing any required affidavits with county recorders. These administrative actions translate the court’s decision into real-world title changes so trustees can manage or distribute assets without further uncertainty. We follow through to ensure the estate administration proceeds smoothly and efficiently.
A Heggstad petition is a court request to declare that an asset belongs to a decedent’s trust despite imperfections in title or missing formal transfer steps. It is commonly used when deeds were not recorded, accounts were not retitled, or other procedural oversights left property outside the trust at the settlor’s death. The petition presents evidence of intent and asks the probate court to issue a binding determination so the trustee can treat the asset as trust property for administration and distribution. This remedy is appropriate when informal corrections are not possible or when institutions or parties require judicial clarity. The petition process ensures that title inconsistencies do not undermine the settlor’s plan and provides a definitive legal mechanism to align asset ownership with the trust’s provisions, enabling trustees to proceed with confidence.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies depending on the complexity of the facts, the responsiveness of interested parties, and the court’s calendar. In straightforward cases with clear documentation and no objections, a petition may be resolved in a matter of weeks to a few months. In more complex disputes or where additional discovery or hearings are required, the process can extend several months. Factors such as obtaining certified documents, serving notice on heirs, and scheduling hearings with the Tuolumne County probate court influence the overall timeline. Proactive document preparation and early communication with interested parties can help shorten the process. For Phoenix Lake matters, timely collection of deeds, trust documents, and bank records, combined with coordinated service and clear factual presentations, typically leads to a more efficient resolution and less uncertainty for trustees and beneficiaries during administration.
Successful petitions rely on credible documentary evidence that supports the decedent’s intent to include the asset in the trust. Typical evidence includes the trust instrument itself, unrecorded deeds, correspondence indicating transfer intent, account statements, beneficiary designations, draft documents, and witness declarations describing the settlor’s actions. Certification of trust or a pour-over will can also corroborate the trust context. Together these documents form a narrative that shows how and why the asset should be treated as trust property. Declarations from trustees, witnesses, or professionals may further strengthen the petition by explaining the circumstances surrounding an attempted transfer or retitling. The court evaluates the totality of the evidence to determine whether the asset belongs to the trust, so well-organized exhibits and clear statements of fact are central to a persuasive filing.
Yes, a trustee may file a Heggstad petition to establish that an asset belongs to the trust, particularly when the trustee is acting within the authority granted by the trust document to manage and settle trust assets. The trustee has a duty to administer trust property and pursue appropriate legal actions to protect trust interests, including petitions that clarify title in court. Trustees should document their authority, includng any relevant certificates of trust or appointment, when preparing the petition to demonstrate standing and authority. Before filing, trustees often consult with beneficiaries and attempt cooperative resolutions where feasible, but when institutions refuse to retitle assets or disputes arise, court action becomes necessary to secure a binding determination. The petition process formalizes the trustee’s role in seeking clarity and ensures that the trust can be administered in accordance with the settlor’s intent.
A court order issued in response to a Heggstad petition provides a strong legal declaration of ownership that significantly reduces the likelihood of future successful challenges to the asset’s status as trust property. While no process can absolutely eliminate all potential claims, judicial determination carries substantial weight and serves as authoritative guidance for title companies and institutions that may otherwise resist retitling. This finality helps trustees act without fear of later successful contest regarding the asset’s status. However, parties who disagree with the court’s decision may still pursue appeals within statutory timeframes, and other legal claims may arise under certain circumstances. Obtaining a clear order and ensuring proper recording and notification reduces the practical risk of ongoing disputes and helps stabilize the administration and distribution of trust assets.
Alternatives to a Heggstad petition include attempting to record corrective deeds, obtaining a certification of trust for institutions, negotiating agreements with heirs and interested parties, or using small estate procedures where applicable. Banks or brokerage firms sometimes accept a certification of trust and proof of authority rather than requiring a court order, and informal settlements among parties can resolve the matter without litigation when all stakeholders agree. These options can be quicker and less costly if institutions and parties are cooperative. When institutions refuse corrective steps, when heirs dispute ownership, or when title histories are complex, a petition may be the most reliable method to secure a formal, enforceable determination. Evaluating alternatives depends on the asset type, available evidence, and the willingness of parties and institutions to cooperate.
Costs for filing a Heggstad petition vary based on the complexity of the case, the amount of document preparation required, court filing fees, and whether contested hearings occur. Simple cases with minimal disputes and limited paperwork will generally be less expensive than matters that require extensive evidence gathering, numerous declarations, or multiple court appearances. Additional costs may include fees for certified copies, title searches, and recording corrected deeds after the court order is obtained. Providing an early assessment of documents and discussing likely strategies helps estimate potential costs for Phoenix Lake clients. Exploring less formal resolutions can reduce expenses, but when litigation is necessary, clients should expect higher costs associated with thorough preparation and court advocacy. Clear communication about fees and anticipated steps helps avoid surprises during the process.
A Heggstad petition itself addresses the ownership status of an asset rather than determining the ultimate distribution among beneficiaries beyond the trust’s terms. Once an asset is declared trust property, it is administered and distributed according to the trust instrument, which may affect how and when beneficiaries receive their shares. Clarifying ownership allows trustees to act under the trust’s directions and complete distributions without the delays associated with title disputes or institutional refusals to transfer assets to the trust. If disputes arise regarding distribution under the trust’s terms, those issues may lead to separate proceedings. The petition’s main effect is to align title with the trust so the trustee can perform estate administration duties, which in turn helps ensure beneficiaries receive their intended distributions more promptly and transparently.
If a title company refuses to retitle property to the trust, there are steps a trustee can take, starting with providing a certification of trust, a recorded court order, or other supporting documentation showing trustee authority. Engaging directly with the company to identify the specific deficiency can clarify whether additional evidence or corrected documentation will suffice. Sometimes providing a certified court order obtained through a Heggstad petition is the most effective way to overcome institutional resistance and compel the title company to update public records. When institutions remain uncooperative despite documentation, obtaining a judicial declaration typically resolves the issue by creating an authoritative record directing the title company to make the required changes. Seeking legal guidance early helps identify the most efficient path to secure title clearance and ensure the trustee can administer the asset as part of the trust.
To minimize the likelihood of needing a Heggstad petition, take preventive steps such as properly titling property into the trust during the settlor’s lifetime, recording deeds promptly, and updating beneficiary designations on accounts and policies. Ensuring that general assignments to trust and other transfer documents are complete and recorded where necessary prevents gaps that could later require court action. Maintaining organized records of estate documents and confirming institutional acceptance of trust certifications helps avoid title issues after death. Regular reviews and updates to the estate plan, especially after major life events or changes in assets, reduce the risk of assets remaining outside the trust. Working with counsel to confirm that all necessary retitling and recordings have been completed ensures the settlor’s intentions are carried out without the need for later petitions.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas