A Heggstad petition can be an essential legal step for beneficiaries and trustees when a trust fails to immediately transfer assets as intended. If you or a loved one are navigating the aftermath of a settlor’s passing and a trustee has not transferred property into the trust, a Heggstad petition may clarify title and facilitate proper distribution. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman handles matters related to trust administration for residents of Tuolumne City and surrounding areas, assisting clients with documents such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and related trust instruments to help restore intended estate plan outcomes.
This page explains what a Heggstad petition is, when it may be appropriate, and the practical steps involved in pursuing one in Tuolumne County. We discuss the courtroom process used to confirm trust ownership, how petitions can resolve title issues for real property and other assets, and what evidence courts consider when determining whether an asset should be treated as trust property. Our goal is to provide clear, local-focused information that helps individuals and families make informed decisions about trust-related disputes and property transfers under California law.
A successful Heggstad petition resolves uncertainty about ownership when trust assets were never formally retitled after the settlor’s death. This remedy can unlock the ability to sell, refinance, or transfer property that otherwise remains in legal limbo, preventing administrative delays and reducing the risk of future disputes. By establishing that certain assets are trust property, a Heggstad petition protects beneficiaries’ rights and clarifies the trustee’s duties. The petition can also prevent clouded title claims that interfere with real estate transactions, providing practical relief to families who need to settle an estate efficiently and with predictable outcomes.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and trust administration services for clients throughout California, including Tuolumne City and San Jose. Our approach emphasizes careful document drafting, clear communication with trustees and beneficiaries, and practical problem solving for issues like Heggstad petitions. Services include drafting revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, certifications of trust, and powers of attorney. We work with clients to identify the best path to resolve title and distribution problems, coordinating evidence and filings needed for petitions and related trust court matters while keeping clients informed throughout the process.
A Heggstad petition is a court proceeding in California used to establish that certain assets should be treated as trust property notwithstanding that formal transfer procedures were not completed. The petition typically requests a judicial determination that a particular asset, often a parcel of real estate, belonged to the trust at the settlor’s death or should be deemed trust property by operation of law. Petitioners usually present documentation such as trust instruments, deeds, bank records, or testimony showing the settlor’s intent and the trustees’ and grantors’ actions. The court then considers the evidence and issues an order clarifying ownership.
The Heggstad petition addresses circumstances where title remains in the settlor’s name or where an asset was not transferred to the trust despite the settlor’s intentions. The process generally involves filing a petition, serving interested parties and heirs, gathering supporting documents, and possibly attending a court hearing. Courts evaluate whether the asset was intended to be part of the trust, whether the trustee exercised control consistent with trust ownership, and whether transfer formalities were attempted. A favorable ruling can permit trustees and beneficiaries to manage, sell, or distribute assets as the trust directs.
A Heggstad petition is a specific type of petition recognized under California law that asks a probate or superior court to determine whether certain property, typically left in the decedent’s name, should be considered trust property. The petition arises when a trust was intended to own the property but the deed or title was never updated. Courts look to the trust document, declarations by the settlor, transfer attempts, and the conduct of trustees and beneficiaries. The aim is to honor the settlor’s intent and prevent assets from being treated as part of the probate estate when they were meant to pass under the trust.
Filing a Heggstad petition requires clear documentation and organization of evidence showing that the asset belonged to the trust or should be considered trust property. Typical elements include the trust instrument, affidavits or testimony from individuals familiar with the settlor’s intent, transfer documents, and any attempted deeds or assignments. The petition must identify interested parties and provide proper legal notice. Courts may require a hearing, and judges evaluate whether the trust’s terms and the settlor’s actions demonstrate ownership in the trust. Proper preparation increases the likelihood of obtaining a judicial declaration that clears title and enables trust administration.
Understanding common terms helps clarify the Heggstad petition process. Definitions include settlor, trustee, beneficiary, trust instrument, deed, title, and transfer on death arrangements. These terms describe the roles and documents involved when determining whether property should be treated as trust assets. Familiarity with the terminology helps beneficiaries and trustees gather appropriate evidence and interact with the court process more effectively. A clear grasp of these concepts supports informed discussions about whether a petition is necessary and how to present the strongest case for judicial recognition of trust ownership.
A settlor is the individual who creates a trust and transfers property into it or intends for the property to be governed by the trust’s terms. The settlor’s written trust document expresses how assets should be managed and distributed. In Heggstad petition matters, the settlor’s intent—often documented in the trust or through contemporaneous records—plays a central role in determining whether property should be treated as trust assets. Courts examine the settlor’s actions, statements, and documents to determine whether title should be recognized in the trust rather than as part of the probate estate.
A trustee is the person or entity charged with managing trust assets in accordance with the trust document and for the benefit of beneficiaries. The trustee’s conduct, such as controlling assets, making expenditures, or executing transactions, can be evidence that property was intended to belong to the trust. In Heggstad petition proceedings, courts may evaluate trustee actions to determine whether an asset was effectively treated as trust property, even if formal title transfer steps were incomplete at the time of the settlor’s death.
A beneficiary is an individual or entity entitled to receive distributions from the trust under its terms. Beneficiaries may initiate Heggstad petitions to confirm that assets are owned by the trust so distributions can proceed as intended. Beneficiaries often provide testimony or documentation to support a petition, such as demonstrating that distributions were expected to come from trust assets. The court’s determination affects beneficiaries’ rights and can influence how property is managed, sold, or transferred according to the trust document.
Title and deed refer to legal documentation showing ownership of real property. A deed transfers ownership, and recorded deeds establish clear title. When a settlor intended property to be held by a trust but the deed remained in the settlor’s name, a Heggstad petition may be used to recognize trust ownership despite the missing recorded transfer. Courts consider deeds, attempted transfers, and supporting evidence to determine whether the property should be treated as trust property, which then affects the ability to sell or refinance the asset.
When estate and trust property transfer issues arise, parties may consider several legal approaches, including filing a Heggstad petition, initiating probate, or pursuing negotiated transfers with interested parties. A Heggstad petition aims to confirm trust ownership and avoid probate, while probate proceedings determine distribution of assets that are part of the decedent’s probate estate. Negotiation can be effective when all parties are cooperative and documentation is clear. The best option depends on the circumstances, the strength of documentary evidence, the willingness of heirs to cooperate, and the need for judicial resolution to clear title.
A limited, nonjudicial approach can work when clear documentation and cooperative parties exist. If the settlor left a trust that unambiguously identifies the asset as trust property and heirs or co-owners agree to sign corrective deeds or affidavits, a simple administrative transfer may suffice. Avoiding court saves time and expense when everyone supports the intended distribution. That approach depends on voluntary cooperation, accurate records, and often the willingness of title companies and mortgage holders to accept alternative proof of ownership without requiring a court order.
A limited approach may also be suitable when the chain of ownership is clear and there is minimal risk of challenge. If the trust documents and other records show consistent treatment of the asset as trust property and there are no competing claims from creditors or unknown heirs, parties can often resolve matters through administrative steps and recorded corrective documents. This route reduces legal costs and speeds property transactions, but it is only advisable when the likelihood of future disputes is low and title companies are satisfied with the documentation provided.
Comprehensive legal action, such as filing a Heggstad petition, becomes necessary when ownership is disputed or documentation is missing. Courts can issue binding determinations that clear title and resolve competing claims, which is important when heirs disagree or when parties refuse to sign corrective deeds. A judicial order provides finality and can be recorded to establish clear title for real property transactions. Comprehensive legal representation ensures that evidence is presented effectively, that notice requirements are met, and that the court process is navigated in a way that protects beneficiaries’ interests.
When an estate involves multiple assets, mortgages, or third-party interests, a comprehensive legal approach is often necessary to address all interrelated issues. Lenders, title companies, and co-owners may require judicial clarification before they accept transfers or releases. A Heggstad petition can address these complexities and produce a court order that resolves competing interests, enabling trustees to manage or dispose of assets according to the trust. Legal representation coordinates interactions with third parties and presents the documentation the court needs to reach an enforceable decision.
A comprehensive approach backed by court authority provides finality and clarity that administrative steps may not achieve. A judicial determination resolving ownership disputes prevents future claims that could otherwise undermine transfers or sales, and it gives title companies the documentation they need to clear title. For beneficiaries and trustees, a court order reduces uncertainty and can accelerate the ability to administer, sell, or refinance properties. Courts can also award fees, where appropriate, and clarify duties and liabilities so trustees can act with greater confidence.
Comprehensive legal proceedings also create a formal record that can be relied upon by successor trustees, heirs, and third parties. This formality may be necessary when assets are substantial, when multiple jurisdictions are involved, or when creditors and tax considerations require definitive documentation. Although litigation involves time and costs, the protective value of a court order frequently outweighs those considerations for parties needing certainty and enforceable title to move forward with estate administration and property transactions.
One major benefit of pursuing a Heggstad petition is obtaining a binding court order that resolves title defects and confirms that property belongs to the trust. This finality allows trustees and beneficiaries to proceed with sales, loans, and distributions without the lingering threat of later claims that could reopen the matter. Court orders can be recorded in the county where the property is located, providing downstream parties with confidence in the ownership record and facilitating transactions that otherwise might be blocked by title companies or lenders concerned about unresolved trust issues.
A judicial resolution reduces the risk of future disputes by providing a public, enforceable determination regarding property ownership. This protection helps beneficiaries avoid prolonged uncertainty and discourages opportunistic claims that can derail transfers or deplete estate assets through litigation. By clarifying rights and duties, the court process helps trustees act confidently and helps heirs understand their entitlements, creating a structured path forward for administering the estate in accordance with the settlor’s intentions and applicable California law.
Collecting the trust document, deeds, bank statements, and any correspondence demonstrating the settlor’s intent is a critical first step. Organized records speed the petition process and help establish a clear factual narrative for the court. Gather original or certified copies of trust instruments, any attempted transfers, and evidence of the trustee’s control over assets. Also compile contact information for beneficiaries and potential interested parties. Well-organized evidence reduces uncertainty, helps clarify issues early, and supports efficient filings with the court.
When filing a Heggstad petition, prepare a coherent evidentiary package that ties the settlor’s intent to the property in question. Include declarations from witnesses, copies of related estate planning documents, and any attempted deeds or assignments. Anticipate likely challenges, such as competing heir claims or creditor interests, and gather supporting documents in advance. Clear presentation to the court improves the prospect of a favorable ruling and expedites the process of recording the order to clear title for future transactions.
Consider a Heggstad petition if you encounter property that appears to have been intended for trust ownership but remains titled in the settlor’s name, especially when you need to sell or refinance that property. If trustees are unable or unwilling to transfer title administratively, or if beneficiaries face conflicting claims from heirs or creditors, an order from the court can resolve matters. The petition is also appropriate when title companies or lenders require judicial clarification before accepting a transfer, creating practical reasons to seek a formal determination.
Another reason to pursue a Heggstad petition is to prevent future disputes that could arise if title is left unresolved. A court ruling provides a permanent record establishing that an asset is trust property, which reduces the likelihood of later claims that might require further litigation. Families and trustees often seek this remedy to achieve certainty, enable administration according to the trust, and ensure that the settlor’s intentions are honored in a way that facilitates transactions, distributions, and long-term estate planning.
Typical situations include real property purchased but never retitled into the trust, bank or investment accounts controlled informally in the settlor’s name, and cases where a trustee exercised control over an asset but never completed formal transfer documents. Disagreements among heirs about asset ownership, or the discovery of missing deeds after the settlor’s death, frequently prompt petitions. Heggstad petitions help address these common problems by asking the court to recognize the trust’s interest and clear the path for distribution and management according to the trust instrument.
Real estate sometimes remains titled in the settlor’s name despite being intended for inclusion in a trust. This creates a cloud on title that can prevent sale, refinancing, or transfer. When deeds were not recorded or corrective deeds were not completed, beneficiaries and trustees may need a court determination to establish trust ownership. A Heggstad petition documents the settlor’s intent and judicially confirms the property’s status, enabling the trustee to manage or dispose of real estate in accordance with the trust’s terms and facilitating market transactions that rely on clear title.
Financial accounts or assets may have been handled as though they belonged to a trust even though formal title transfers were not completed. Instances where the trustee paid expenses or otherwise treated assets as trust property can support a petition to have the court recognize trust ownership. Gathering records that show management consistent with trust ownership—such as payment of mortgage, insurance, taxes, or maintenance—helps establish the factual basis for a judicial declaration and supports the petition to clear title and resolve distribution issues.
When heirs or other interested parties dispute whether an asset should be part of the trust, a Heggstad petition can provide a decisive remedy by asking the court to evaluate evidence and issue a binding determination. Conflicting claims can stall administration and complicate transactions. The petition process ensures that all interested parties receive notice and have an opportunity to be heard, allowing the court to make a formal ruling that resolves disputes and provides a recorded order to guide trustees, beneficiaries, and title companies going forward.
If you are facing trust transfer issues in Tuolumne City, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can help you assess whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate and guide you through the necessary steps. We assist clients in compiling trust documents, preparing petition filings, and coordinating with heirs and other interested parties. Our approach emphasizes clear communication about what to expect, practical strategies to resolve title issues, and preparation for court when judicial action is the best path to secure trust property and move forward with estate administration.
Our firm brings focused legal attention to trust administration and property issues for clients across California, including Tuolumne City and the broader Tuolumne County area. We assist with a variety of estate planning documents such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, advance health care directives, and powers of attorney. When a Heggstad petition is needed, we help assemble the evidence, identify interested parties, and navigate procedural requirements to present a clear, well-supported case to the court. Clear communication and methodical preparation are central to our service approach.
Clients turn to our office when they need help resolving clouds on title or clarifying trust ownership to enable sales, distributions, or refinancing. We coordinate with title companies, lenders, and other stakeholders to address documentation needs and to ensure that court orders are properly recorded. Our focus is on practical solutions that align with the settlor’s intent and protect beneficiaries’ interests, while providing straightforward guidance about timelines, potential outcomes, and procedural steps involved in the petition process.
We also assist with related estate planning updates to prevent future issues, such as preparing or amending trusts, creating certifications of trust, and drafting pour-over wills and powers of attorney. These preventive measures help avoid the need for petitions down the road by ensuring assets are appropriately titled and trust administration is documented. For clients in Tuolumne City and surrounding communities, we provide responsive assistance and clear explanations to help families navigate trust-related decisions with confidence.
Our process begins with a detailed intake to review the trust, deeds, and other evidence, followed by identifying interested parties and drafting the petition. We prepare declarations, exhibits, and supporting documents that tie the asset to the trust and satisfy filing requirements. After filing, we ensure proper service and manage any responses, negotiating where possible and preparing for hearings when necessary. We keep clients apprised of deadlines and record the court’s order once obtained so the trustee can take the next steps in administration or property transactions.
Initial assessment focuses on reviewing the trust document, deeds, and any records demonstrating the settlor’s intent and the trustee’s actions. We identify potential interested parties, such as heirs and lienholders, and evaluate the strength of the evidence supporting trust ownership. This phase includes obtaining copies of recorded instruments, bank records, and correspondence that reflect treatment of the asset as trust property. A thorough review helps determine whether a Heggstad petition is the most appropriate remedy and what evidence will be needed to present a compelling case to the court.
Collecting original trust documents, deeds, and related records is essential. This includes the trust instrument, any amendments, deed copies, records of attempted transfers, and proof of payments or control that indicate trust ownership. These documents form the backbone of the petition and help demonstrate the settlor’s intent. Accurate and complete documentation expedites the preparation of declarations and exhibits, and it helps identify other parties who must be notified, improving the likelihood of a smooth petition process.
Early identification of interested parties is required to ensure proper legal notice and avoid procedural defects. Interested parties may include beneficiaries, heirs, creditors, and lienholders. We prepare service lists and ensure notices are delivered in compliance with California procedures. Proper notification protects the integrity of the petition and reduces the risk of later challenges based on inadequate service. Timely and accurate notice also gives other parties an opportunity to respond, which can sometimes lead to negotiated resolutions without the need for a contested hearing.
After assembling the evidence and preparing declarations, we file the Heggstad petition with the appropriate court and arrange legal service on all identified interested parties. The petition sets forth the facts, legal basis, and the relief requested, and includes exhibits that demonstrate the settlor’s intent and the trustee’s actions. Proper filing and service ensure the court can consider the matter and protect procedural rights for all parties. We monitor responses and, where possible, seek agreed orders to streamline resolution without a contested hearing.
Drafting the petition involves presenting a clear narrative supported by documentary exhibits and sworn declarations. The petition must explain why the court should declare the asset trust property and provide legal citations and factual support for the requested relief. Organized exhibits and concise declarations help the judge understand the history and context of the asset and the trust, improving the court’s ability to issue a definitive ruling that resolves the title issue and allows the trustee to act.
Once the petition is filed and parties served, responses may arrive that raise objections or propose alternative resolutions. We manage communications and negotiations to attempt resolution where appropriate while preparing for court if disputes persist. Engaging with other parties early can lead to agreed orders that avoid contested hearings, but when litigation is necessary, we ensure the record is complete and that arguments are focused on the legal standards courts apply to Heggstad petitions.
If the matter proceeds to a hearing, we present the evidence and arguments needed to obtain a judicial determination. The judge may issue an order that clarifies ownership and directs recording to clear the title. Once an order is obtained, it is recorded in the county records to reflect the court’s determination. This recorded order becomes the basis for title companies and lenders to accept transfers, enabling trustees to manage or dispose of assets consistent with the trust. Post-order steps include communicating outcomes to interested parties and updating estate administration records.
Preparation for a hearing includes finalizing declarations, organizing exhibits, and developing concise legal arguments to present to the judge. Witnesses or sworn declarations should be ready to explain the settlor’s intent and actions taken regarding the asset. Clear presentation of facts is important to persuade the court that trust ownership should be recognized despite missing recorded transfers. We assist clients in preparing testimony and arranging an efficient courtroom presentation to support a favorable ruling.
After the court issues an order recognizing an asset as trust property, the order should be recorded in the county where the property is located to provide a public record clearing title. Recording the order enables trustees to proceed with sales, refinancing, or transfers without further challenge to ownership. We coordinate the recording process, notify title companies and lenders as needed, and advise trustees on the administrative steps required to complete trust administration in accordance with the judge’s order and the trust’s provisions.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing used to ask a California court to declare that a particular asset should be treated as trust property even if the formal transfer into the trust was not recorded. It is commonly used when real property or other assets remain titled in the settlor’s name despite clear indications that the assets were intended to be governed by the trust. The petition presents documentary evidence and testimony showing the settlor’s intent and the trustee’s actions, and it requests a judicial declaration to clear title and enable trust administration. A Heggstad petition is appropriate when administrative fixes are impractical or when interested parties cannot agree on corrective steps. It is also useful when title companies or lenders require a court order before accepting a transfer. Filing such a petition creates a public, enforceable determination that protects beneficiaries and trustees by establishing ownership in a way that can be recorded and relied upon for future transactions.
A Heggstad petition is narrowly focused on whether a specific asset should be recognized as trust property, while probate is a court process that administers assets that are part of a decedent’s probate estate. Probate determines testamentary validity and distributes assets that are not held in trust or otherwise transferred. A Heggstad petition seeks to avoid probate for assets intended to pass under a trust by asking the court to treat those assets as trust property despite any missing recorded transfer. In practice, a Heggstad petition can reduce the need for probate with respect to particular assets, but it does not replace probate for assets that are properly part of the probate estate. The petition complements trust administration by resolving title issues so that trustees can manage or distribute assets without involving full probate proceedings for those items.
Typical evidence for a Heggstad petition includes the trust document and any amendments, deeds or attempted transfer documents, bank or account statements, and declarations from individuals who can testify about the settlor’s intent and actions. Records showing that the trustee managed the asset—such as mortgage payments, insurance premiums, maintenance, or other expenditures—can support the claim that the asset was treated as trust property. Clear, contemporaneous documentation that ties the asset to the trust strengthens the petition. Courts also consider the conduct of parties and any communications that demonstrate intent. When direct documentary evidence is limited, sworn declarations from witnesses with firsthand knowledge can be important. The stronger and more consistent the evidence presented, the more likely the court will find that the asset should be recognized as trust property for purposes of administration and title clearing.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies with the complexity of the matter, the court’s calendar, and whether parties contest the petition. Simple, uncontested petitions that have strong documentary support and cooperative parties may be resolved in a matter of a few months. More complex or contested matters can take longer, particularly if hearings, multiple filings, or discovery are required. Scheduling a hearing and allowing time for service and response periods contributes to the overall timeline. Preparation time to gather documents and prepare declarations also affects how quickly a petition can be filed. Engaging early, organizing evidence, and identifying interested parties helps streamline the process. Where disputes arise, additional time for motions, negotiations, and preparation for contested hearings can extend the timeline beyond initial estimates.
Yes, a Heggstad petition can sometimes be avoided if all interested parties agree on corrective transfers and formal documentation. When beneficiaries, heirs, and trustees cooperate, parties can execute corrective deeds, affidavits, or other instruments to retitle assets without court involvement. This administrative path can save time and legal costs but requires clear records and willing participants. Title companies and lenders must also be satisfied with the documentation before accepting transfers, and in some situations they still may require recorded court orders. Even when an agreement is possible, it is important to document negotiations and ensure that any corrective actions comply with legal requirements and protect the rights of all interested parties. If parties cannot reach agreement or if third parties object, a Heggstad petition provides a formal avenue to obtain a definitive judicial determination.
A recorded court order obtained through a Heggstad petition typically provides the kind of assurance lenders and title companies need to clear title or approve transactions. The order serves as a public record that the court has determined the asset is trust property, which reduces uncertainty for third parties involved in sales, refinances, or transfers. Title companies often require such an order when the recorded title does not match the trust records, making the petition a practical tool for completing transactions. However, requirements can vary among lenders and title companies, and additional documentation or conditions may be requested. Coordinating with the lender or title company early in the process helps ensure the petition and the form of the order will meet their requirements for accepting a transfer or issuing insurance.
When filing a Heggstad petition, it is necessary to identify and provide legal notice to all interested parties under California rules, including named beneficiaries, heirs, and known creditors or lienholders. Proper service on these parties protects the petition from being invalidated for lack of notice and gives them an opportunity to respond or object. Depending on the circumstances, notice may also be required to be published or mailed to unknown heirs, and additional procedural steps may apply to ensure compliance with court rules. Accurate identification and timely notification of interested parties is an important procedural element that affects the petition’s progress. Failure to include or properly serve an interested party can lead to delays or the need for corrective filings. Early attention to the parties entitled to notice helps avoid avoidable procedural setbacks and supports a smoother path to a final court order.
Common objections to a Heggstad petition include competing claims from heirs who assert the asset was never intended for the trust, creditors asserting liens, or disputes over the authenticity or interpretation of trust documents. Challenges may also arise regarding whether the trustee properly acted for the trust or whether the evidence presented is sufficient to prove the settlor’s intent. Anticipating such objections and preparing strong, well-documented evidence reduces the risk that the petition will be denied or heavily contested. Procedural defects, such as improper service or incomplete notice, are another frequent obstacle. Ensuring that all interested parties receive proper notice and that filings comply with court requirements mitigates the risk of delays. Addressing possible objections up front through careful preparation and open communication can lead to negotiated resolutions or strengthen the court presentation if the matter proceeds to hearing.
Yes, a trustee may file a Heggstad petition on behalf of the trust to resolve title issues that prevent proper administration. Trustees have a duty to manage trust assets in the beneficiaries’ interests and may seek a court determination when title defects or unclear ownership impede those duties. A trustee filing the petition must present evidence demonstrating the trust’s interest in the asset and follow required notice procedures so that beneficiaries and other interested parties can participate in the proceedings. When trustees pursue a petition, they must act in accordance with their fiduciary responsibilities, documenting their efforts and serving all required parties. Courts review whether the trustee’s actions align with the trust terms and whether the petition is supported by sufficient evidence. A judicial order obtained by the trustee can then enable effective administration and clarify property status for subsequent transactions.
Costs for pursuing a Heggstad petition vary depending on case complexity, the need for contested hearings, and the time required to gather evidence and prepare filings. Expenses may include attorney fees, court filing fees, costs of serving interested parties, and recording fees for any resulting orders. Simple, uncontested matters generally incur lower costs, while disputes and contested hearings increase time and expense. Discussing anticipated fees and budgeting expectations early in the engagement helps provide clarity about likely financial commitments. In some cases, courts may award fees or shift costs based on the outcome and specific statutory authorities, but this is fact-dependent. Parties should weigh the potential benefits of securing clear title and finality against the projected cost of litigation, and consider whether negotiation or administrative remedies could achieve the same result at lower expense.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas