A Heggstad petition is a legal filing in California that asks the court to treat certain assets as trust property when a decedent intended those assets to belong to a trust but title was not properly transferred prior to death. For residents of Casa Conejo, navigating this process can protect beneficiaries, confirm trust ownership, and simplify distribution. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman represents clients in estate planning matters across Ventura County and can help determine if a Heggstad petition is the appropriate path. This page explains the petition, what it accomplishes, and practical next steps for families facing trust transfer issues.
When assets are intended to be held by a trust but paperwork or title transfer lags behind the grantor’s death, beneficiaries and trustees may encounter legal obstacles. A Heggstad petition requests a judicial order that those assets be treated as if they had been properly transferred to the trust, honoring the decedent’s intent and avoiding unnecessary delays. This process can limit disputes, clarify ownership, and encourage efficient estate administration. This guide outlines the petition process, the types of assets commonly involved, and how local laws in Ventura County influence outcomes for Casa Conejo residents.
Filing a Heggstad petition can make a material difference for families and trustees who need to consolidate assets under a trust after a grantor’s death. The legal order gives clear authority to manage, transfer, or distribute property that the decedent intended to own in trust, preventing time-consuming court probate for those particular assets. In practice, successful petitions reduce administrative obstacles, minimize friction among beneficiaries, and safeguard the trust’s integrity. For residents of Casa Conejo, securing a prompt legal determination helps preserve assets and keeps the estate administration aligned with the grantor’s wishes while respecting California trust law.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning and trust administration services that include handling Heggstad petitions for clients across Ventura County and nearby regions. Our approach focuses on careful review of trust documents, asset records, and the factual circumstances surrounding title and transfer. We work to present clear evidence of the grantor’s intent and assist trustees in obtaining judicial confirmation when needed. The firm combines practical legal knowledge with attention to client concerns, aiming to resolve title disputes and enable trustees to manage and distribute trust assets in accordance with governing documents and California law.
A Heggstad petition is rooted in California case law and addresses situations where items were meant to be trust property but remained titled in the deceased person’s name. The petition asks a probate court to declare that the property should be treated as part of the trust. Typical scenarios include bank accounts, real estate, or retirement accounts where the paperwork was not completed. Understanding the petition requires reviewing the trust instrument, transfer attempts, and any documentary evidence showing the decedent’s intent to fund the trust. This preparatory work shapes the legal argument and evidence submitted to the court.
After filing the petition, the trustee must notify interested parties and provide supporting documentation such as copies of the trust, declarations about transfer attempts, and records showing control or intent. The court evaluates whether the evidence establishes that the decedent intended the asset to be in the trust at the time of death. A favorable ruling allows the trustee to treat the asset as trust property for administration and distribution. For Casa Conejo families, the process can resolve title issues without full probate, streamlining asset distribution and upholding the trust’s directions.
A Heggstad petition is a formal request to a probate court that a decedent’s asset, though still in the decedent’s name, be declared part of the decedent’s trust based on evidence of an intended transfer. The petition’s purpose is to effectuate the grantor’s intent and allow trustees to manage and distribute property consistent with trust provisions. It is commonly used to correct title oversights and to confirm that the trust controls specified assets. The petition process requires factual proof of intent, and it can prevent unnecessary probate proceedings for those assets that the decedent meant to fund into the trust.
Successful Heggstad petitions typically present consistent documentary evidence, witness declarations, and any transfer documentation showing the grantor’s intent. The petition must identify the asset, describe its current title, and explain why it should be treated as trust property. Notice to beneficiaries and interested parties is part of the process, followed by briefing and sometimes a hearing. The court will weigh the totality of evidence, including trust provisions, conversations, or attempts to transfer, before issuing an order that treats the asset as part of the trust for administration and distribution purposes.
Understanding a Heggstad petition benefits from familiarity with common estate and trust terms such as trustee, grantor, beneficiary, intestate succession, and probate. Additional concepts include constructive trust, constructive transfer, and court orders that relate to trust administration. Clear definitions help trustees and beneficiaries recognize what evidence supports a petition and how a successful petition interacts with the broader estate plan. This section defines terms frequently referenced in petitions and trust litigation to support informed decision making in Casa Conejo and throughout Ventura County.
The grantor, also called the settlor, is the person who creates a trust and transfers assets into it for management and distribution. The grantor’s intentions, as reflected in trust documents and surrounding circumstances, are central to a Heggstad petition. Evidence showing that the grantor intended specific property to be held by the trust at death can support the argument that the asset should be treated as trust property. Understanding the grantor’s actions and communications can clarify whether a judicial declaration is appropriate to honor the trust’s terms.
A trustee is the individual or entity appointed to manage trust assets, carry out distributions, and follow the directions set forth in the trust document. When title issues arise after a grantor’s death, the trustee may bring a Heggstad petition to confirm that certain assets belong to the trust. The trustee’s documentation and sworn declarations explaining transfer attempts and the grantor’s intentions play an important role in persuading the court to recognize the property as trust-controlled for administration and distribution purposes.
A beneficiary is a person or organization entitled to receive benefits from a trust under its terms. Beneficiaries may be affected by a Heggstad petition because the court’s decision determines which property is subject to the trust and consequently how distributions proceed. Beneficiaries are typically notified of the petition and may object if they believe the property should pass through probate or under different terms. The court evaluates evidence in light of beneficiary interests and the grantor’s documented intentions.
Probate is the court-supervised process for distributing assets of someone who died owning property outright, while trust administration is the process of carrying out a trust’s provisions without court probate for trust assets. A Heggstad petition seeks to treat certain assets as trust property, thereby avoiding probate for those items. This distinction matters because trust administration typically proceeds more privately and often with fewer formalities than probate, enabling trustees to manage and distribute assets according to the trust instrument rather than through probate procedures.
When an asset’s title does not reflect the decedent’s intent to hold it in trust, interested parties may consider different legal approaches, including a Heggstad petition, a full probate administration, or alternative remedies like corrective transfers or interpleader. A Heggstad petition directly asks the court to treat the property as trust-owned and can be quicker and more focused than full probate. Each option has tradeoffs related to time, cost, privacy, and the strength of available evidence. Assessing the facts in Casa Conejo and consulting with counsel helps determine the most practical path.
A limited Heggstad petition is often suitable when only a few assets remain titled in the decedent’s name and the grantor’s intent to fund the trust is well documented. Clear paper trails like account change requests, correspondence, or contemporaneous statements can support the petition. In such cases, the petition can be tailored to specific property, minimizing scope, cost, and delay. This approach benefits families in Casa Conejo who want to resolve discrete title issues without engaging in a larger probate process that would address unrelated assets.
A focused petition works best where beneficiaries and interested parties are cooperative or unlikely to contest the trust transfer. If there are no competing claims and the trustee can offer persuasive documentation, the court process tends to be more straightforward. In cooperative scenarios, the petition primarily confirms administrative authority and avoids adversarial proceedings, enabling the trustee to proceed with management and distribution consistent with the trust. For Casa Conejo residents, cooperation can significantly shorten resolution time and reduce legal expenses.
Comprehensive legal efforts become necessary when contested ownership, conflicting beneficiary claims, or complex assets like jointly owned real estate and retirement accounts are involved. In such circumstances, a straightforward petition may not resolve all issues, and additional motions, hearings, or parallel litigation could be required. The legal team will investigate chain of title, beneficiary designations, and any transfers to identify the best path. For Casa Conejo families, a thorough strategy can protect assets and clarify ownership despite more challenging factual situations.
When assets are spread across jurisdictions or have title defects that implicate property law beyond trust issues, more comprehensive legal work is often required. This can include recorded deed corrections, coordination with financial institutions, or litigation in separate venues. Addressing these complications may involve multiple filings, careful documentary proof, and coordination with trustees and beneficiaries. For Casa Conejo residents, addressing cross-jurisdictional or technical defects early reduces the risk of later disputes and supports a successful trust administration outcome.
A comprehensive approach to Heggstad petitions and related trust matters ensures that trustees and beneficiaries address both immediate title problems and underlying documentation issues. By taking a full view of the estate plan, potential gaps or ambiguities can be identified and resolved, reducing the chance of future litigation. Trustees gain clearer authority to act, financial institutions receive stronger assurances when transferring accounts, and beneficiaries obtain predictable distributions. For Casa Conejo families, this approach supports a smoother transition and better alignment with the deceased person’s documented intentions.
Comprehensive handling also allows coordination with other estate tasks, such as trust amendments, deeds, and beneficiary claim resolution, which can prevent piecemeal problems later. Addressing the full scope of title, contractual, and administrative issues reduces administrative burden and often leads to more cost-effective outcomes over time. It also protects against inadvertent omissions that might trigger contested proceedings, creating a clearer path for trustees to fulfill their duties in accordance with trust provisions and applicable California law.
A comprehensive approach increases the likelihood that the court will accept the evidence of the grantor’s intent and properly classify assets as trust property. That judicial certainty reduces the risk that beneficiaries or third parties will challenge distributions later. Addressing documentation, title recordation, and institutional processes upfront minimizes grounds for dispute. For trustees in Casa Conejo, obtaining a clear court order and following thorough administrative steps helps ensure that trust assets are managed and distributed with confidence and legal stability.
By resolving title and documentation issues comprehensively, trustees can proceed with administration and distribution without repeated legal interruptions. Consolidating tasks like correcting deeds, coordinating with banks, and filing necessary court petitions leads to fewer procedural delays. This streamlining benefits beneficiaries awaiting distributions and reduces cumulative legal costs associated with repeated filings. For Casa Conejo families, a proactive, thorough strategy supports efficient closure of the estate and faithful implementation of the trust’s terms.
Collecting documentation that demonstrates the decedent’s intent to fund a trust is essential. Helpful items include a signed trust instrument, account change requests, canceled checks, correspondence indicating intent to transfer, and declarations from individuals who assisted the grantor. Detailed records of transfer attempts or communications with financial institutions offer persuasive support for a petition. In Casa Conejo cases, thorough documentation reduces ambiguity, speeds review, and strengthens the trustee’s position when requesting the court to treat assets as trust property for administration and distribution.
Work proactively with banks, title companies, and other institutions that hold assets to understand their procedures for transferring accounts to a trust. Some institutions accept a court order like a Heggstad ruling as proof of trust ownership, while others require additional documentation. Early coordination can shorten processing times, clarify required documents, and help avoid repeated filings. For Casa Conejo matters, aligning institutional requirements with the legal strategy helps move assets into the trust efficiently and supports timely distribution to beneficiaries.
Consider a Heggstad petition when title defects or administrative oversights prevent trust assets from being recognized and distributed according to the grantor’s wishes. The petition provides a targeted remedy to treat specific property as trust-held, avoiding full probate for those items and enabling the trustee to fulfill their duties. For trustees and beneficiaries in Casa Conejo, a prompt petition preserves estate value, avoids delays, and formalizes authority to manage assets. The remedy is particularly helpful when the grantor’s intent is clear but the paperwork was incomplete at death.
Families may also consider this service when swift estate administration matters to beneficiaries who rely on timely distributions for financial or personal reasons. Resolving title issues promptly through a Heggstad petition reduces uncertainty and may prevent creditor or third-party complications that arise during prolonged administration. For Casa Conejo residents, this approach aligns estate outcomes with the grantor’s plan while providing trustees with the documented authority necessary to act on behalf of the trust and its beneficiaries.
Typical triggers for a Heggstad petition include bank or brokerage accounts still titled in the decedent’s name, real property deeds that were not recorded in the trust name, and retirement or safe deposit items with incomplete beneficiary change processes. Other scenarios involve assets transferred informally or verbally intended for the trust but lacking formal paperwork. In Casa Conejo, these situations often arise when grantors intended to fund a revocable living trust but passed before completing all administrative steps, leaving trustees to seek court clarification.
One frequent situation is an account that the grantor meant to retitle into the trust but that remains in the decedent’s name. Even when the trust exists and the grantor intended funding, institutions may refuse transfers without a court order. A Heggstad petition explains those facts to the court and requests a declaration that treats the account as trust property. This legal step helps trustees obtain control of funds and proceed with distributions consistent with the trust document.
Real estate intended for a trust sometimes remains recorded in the grantor’s name, either due to oversight or unfinished deed execution. When title does not reflect the trust, the trustee may file a Heggstad petition asking the court to declare the property part of the trust based on the grantor’s intent. Achieving a court order can simplify later deeds or conveyances and clarifies trustee authority for managing or selling property in accordance with trust provisions.
Situations where beneficiary designations conflict with trust instructions can create uncertainty and potential disputes. When the decedent’s intent to include certain assets in the trust is documented but designations were not updated, a Heggstad petition may be used to resolve the conflict by presenting evidence of the grantor’s intent and requesting a court ruling that harmonizes asset ownership with the trust. Addressing such conflicts reduces contested outcomes and promotes orderly distribution under the trust.
We help trustees and family members in Casa Conejo pursue Heggstad petitions and related trust administration matters. Our approach begins with a careful review of trust documents, asset records, and communications reflecting the decedent’s intent. We prepare filings, provide required notice to interested parties, and present the factual record necessary to obtain a judicial declaration that assets should be treated as trust property. Our goal is to reduce delay, resolve title issues, and support trustees in carrying out the trust in accordance with California law and the grantor’s documented wishes.
We offer attentive legal representation for trustees and family members addressing trust funding oversights and title issues. Our approach emphasizes thorough evidence gathering, precise filings, and consistent communication with all interested parties. We focus on building a persuasive record of the grantor’s intent and coordinating with financial institutions and title agents to facilitate corrective transfers. For Casa Conejo clients, we aim to resolve issues efficiently while preserving estate value and supporting trustees in fulfilling their duties under the trust.
From initial case assessment through court filings and follow-up, we strive to keep clients informed and minimize procedural delays. We help prepare witness declarations, compile financial records, and obtain any necessary title corrections. Our team coordinates notice to beneficiaries and works to address objections constructively to avoid extended litigation. For trustees who must act quickly, our measured approach provides clarity, legal support, and practical solutions tailored to the specific circumstances of each matter.
We also assist when a Heggstad petition reveals broader estate planning gaps, such as unrecorded deeds or outdated beneficiary designations. In such instances, we advise trustees on steps to preserve assets and prevent future complications, including administrative corrections and documentation updates where appropriate. Our focus for Casa Conejo families is to secure a practical resolution that honors the decedent’s intentions and reduces the risk of contested proceedings, enabling trustees to proceed with administration with confidence.
Our process begins with a comprehensive review of the trust, asset records, and any communications or documents showing the grantor’s intent to fund the trust. We identify the assets at issue, collect supporting evidence, and prepare the petition and necessary declarations. We ensure proper notice is given to heirs and beneficiaries and engage with institutions holding the assets to determine any additional requirements. We then present the petition to the court and handle hearings, aiming for a clear judicial order that allows trustees to treat the assets as trust property for administration and distribution.
The first step is a careful evaluation of the trust instrument, asset titles, account statements, and any written or recorded attempts to transfer property. We gather declarations from witnesses who can attest to the grantor’s intent and collect institutional correspondence that reflects transfer attempts or instructions. This fact-finding phase forms the evidentiary backbone of the petition and helps determine the best legal strategy. For Casa Conejo cases, a thorough initial review often reveals straightforward paths to resolution.
We identify each asset that may be subject to the petition and review title records, account registration, and beneficiary designations. This audit clarifies whether assets were indeed intended for the trust and what corrective steps may be necessary. We assemble deeds, account agreements, statements, and prior communications to create a clear narrative for the court. This detailed documentation is essential to persuade a judge that the property should be treated as trust-owned for administration and distribution.
Gathering witness declarations, written requests for transfer, and other documentary proof helps establish the grantor’s intent. We prepare sworn statements from trustees or family members who were present when funding actions were taken or requested. These declarations, combined with documentary evidence, create a persuasive record for the petition. In Casa Conejo matters, this coordinated evidentiary approach improves the likelihood of obtaining a court ruling that treats the contested assets as part of the trust.
After assembling the evidence, we draft the Heggstad petition and supporting declarations and file them with the appropriate probate court in Ventura County. The filing includes a clear description of the assets, the basis for treating them as trust property, and the relief requested. We then serve notice on beneficiaries, heirs, and any interested parties consistent with statutory requirements. Proper notice allows for potential objections to be raised and ensures the proceeding complies with California procedural rules.
The petition must explain the factual basis for treating each asset as trust property and include sworn declarations and document exhibits. We craft clear legal arguments that tie the evidence to the legal standard applied by the court. The filing package is organized to facilitate judicial review and to provide institutions with the clarity needed to recognize the petition’s scope. A well-prepared submission helps shorten the court’s review and increases the chance of an orderly resolution.
After filing, we ensure that all interested parties receive formal notice in accordance with state rules. We monitor incoming responses or objections and prepare replies or settlement communications as appropriate. If parties dispute the petition, we handle the necessary briefing and prepare for hearings. In many cases, timely and effective notice leads to cooperative resolution without protracted litigation, allowing trustees in Casa Conejo to proceed with distribution sooner.
If the court holds a hearing, we present the factual record and legal arguments to support a ruling that the asset should be treated as trust property. Once the court issues an order, we assist with any follow-up, such as recording a corrected deed, providing the order to financial institutions, and carrying out transfers or distributions. These post-order actions are important to ensure the court’s determination is effective and that trustees can manage and distribute the assets according to the trust.
At the hearing, we explain the documentary and testimonial evidence demonstrating the grantor’s intent and how each asset fits within the trust scheme. The court reviews the record and may issue an order declaring the property to be trust-owned. Obtaining this judicial confirmation is critical for trustees who need formal authority to access or transfer assets and to close the administration process without resorting to broader probate steps.
Following a favorable order, we work with title companies, banks, and other institutions to implement the transfer or recognition of trust ownership. This may include recording deeds, submitting certified copies of the court order, or completing account retitling. We also assist trustees with distribution steps required by the trust instrument and ensure all administrative records reflect the change. Proper implementation protects the trust’s integrity and helps avoid future disputes related to those assets.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing in California asking the probate court to treat particular assets as belonging to a decedent’s trust when those assets remain titled in the decedent’s name despite an intent to fund the trust. It is commonly used when a grantor created a revocable living trust but did not complete the administrative step of retitling accounts or recording deeds prior to death. The petition presents evidence of intent and requests an order that the asset be treated as trust property for administration and distribution under the trust instruments. Supporting a petition requires documentary proof such as the trust document, account statements, written transfer requests, and witness declarations. The court evaluates whether the totality of evidence shows the grantor intended the asset to be part of the trust at death. A successful petition allows the trustee to manage and distribute the asset according to the trust, avoiding full probate for those specific items and aligning outcomes with the decedent’s documented wishes.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition in Ventura County depends on the complexity of the case, the clarity of the evidence, and whether interested parties object. In cases with straightforward documentation and cooperative beneficiaries, the matter can be resolved more quickly, sometimes within a few months after filing. However, if there are title complications, multiple assets, or disputes, the process may extend longer due to briefing schedules, hearing availability, and potential litigation that needs resolution. Courts also operate on varying calendars and require statutory notice periods that can influence timing. Preparing a thorough petition with complete documentary support and providing clear notice to interested parties helps reduce avoidable delays. Working proactively with institutions holding the assets can also speed implementation once a court provides an order, enabling trustees to proceed with administration more quickly.
The strongest petitions present clear and consistent documentary evidence showing the grantor’s intent to place specific assets in the trust. This often includes a copy of the trust agreement, instructions or forms requesting account retitling, canceled checks or transfers, email or written correspondence, and affidavits from individuals who were aware of the grantor’s intent. Deeds, title records, and statements from institutions can further corroborate the factual record presented to the court. Witness declarations explaining the grantor’s efforts to fund the trust and the context of any informal transfer attempts can be persuasive. The court weighs the overall evidence to decide if the asset should be treated as trust property. Gathering and organizing these materials in advance improves the clarity and persuasiveness of the petition and reduces the risk that the matter will require extended litigation.
Filing a Heggstad petition is a probate court action, but it is focused on a narrow issue: whether specific property should be treated as trust-owned because the grantor intended it to be part of the trust. A successful petition allows those particular assets to be administered under the trust rather than through full probate. It does not automatically convert the entire estate into a probate administration, and it is often used precisely to avoid full probate for those items. However, if contested or if the estate involves additional assets subject to probate, broader proceedings may arise. The outcome depends on whether other estate matters require separate probate steps. For many Casa Conejo cases, a Heggstad petition resolves only the title dispute so trustees can proceed with trust administration for the affected assets.
Yes, beneficiaries or other interested parties may object to a Heggstad petition if they believe the assets should pass through probate or under different terms. When an objection is filed, the court will consider the parties’ arguments, review the evidence, and potentially hold a hearing to resolve disputed facts. Objections can extend the timeline and increase costs, especially where competing claims or unclear documentation exist. To address objections, petitioning trustees should be prepared to provide comprehensive documentation and compelling declarations that explain the grantor’s actions and intent. Settlement discussions or negotiated resolutions are sometimes possible and can prevent protracted litigation. Clear evidence and cooperative communication with interested parties can reduce the chance of successful objections and facilitate a judicial ruling in favor of trust treatment for the assets.
Costs for pursuing a Heggstad petition vary based on the complexity of the matter, the number of assets involved, and whether disputes arise. Expenses include court filing fees, costs for serving notice to interested parties, fees for obtaining certified documents or title reports, and attorneys’ fees for preparing and prosecuting the petition. In straightforward cases with cooperative parties, overall costs can be modest relative to full probate, while contested matters may incur significantly higher expenses due to briefing and hearings. Minimizing cost often involves preparing a well-documented petition, engaging in early communication with beneficiaries and institutions, and pursuing negotiated resolutions where feasible. Trustees should weigh potential costs against the benefits of avoiding probate for particular assets and consult with counsel to estimate likely expenses given the case specifics in Casa Conejo and Ventura County.
When the asset is real property recorded in the decedent’s name, a Heggstad petition asks the court to declare that the property should be treated as trust-owned because the grantor intended the trust to hold it. A favorable order can then be used to record corrective documents, transfer title into the trust, or otherwise align the recorded ownership with the trust’s terms. This process helps trustees manage, sell, or distribute property according to the trust instrument without resorting to full probate for that specific parcel. Corrective steps after an order may include recording the court order with the county recorder, preparing a new deed in the trust’s name, and ensuring any associated mortgages or liens are properly handled. Working with title companies and county officials helps make sure the transfer is effective and legally recognized, reducing the chance of future title disputes for the property in question.
A trustee can initiate the procedural filing themselves, but because Heggstad petitions involve legal standards, evidentiary requirements, and court procedure, many trustees choose legal representation to ensure filings are complete and persuasive. An attorney can prepare declarations, organize documentary exhibits, handle service of notices, and manage potential objections or hearings. Legal counsel helps present a coherent record that aligns with California case law and local probate court practice, which can be important for timely resolution. For trustees who proceed without representation, careful attention to procedural rules, notice requirements, and the substantive evidence needed to prove the grantor’s intent is crucial. Working with experienced professionals such as title agents and financial institution representatives can also support the petition, but professional legal assistance often improves the chance of a favorable outcome and reduces procedural risk in contested or complex cases.
If a financial institution resists recognizing a court order, trustees may need to present certified copies of the order along with supporting court documents and coordinate formally with the institution’s legal or compliance department. Sometimes additional steps are required by the institution, such as providing a certified death certificate, letters testamentary, or other transaction-specific forms. Clear communication and timely submission of required documents usually resolves institutional concerns and facilitates the transfer or retitling process. If the institution continues to refuse post-order, trustees can seek further court direction through contempt proceedings or supplemental orders clarifying the scope and effect of the original ruling. Working with counsel to negotiate or, if necessary, obtain additional judicial instructions helps ensure that the court’s determination is effectively implemented and that the trustee gains the authority needed to access or transfer the assets according to the trust.
Before meeting with counsel, gather the trust document and any drafts, copies of deeds, account statements, beneficiary designation forms, and records of attempted transfers. Bring written communications that reflect the grantor’s intent to place assets in the trust, such as emails, letters, or change-of-title requests. Also prepare a list of asset locations, account numbers, and the names of beneficiaries and potential interested parties, which helps counsel evaluate the scope of the issue quickly. Providing any available witness contact information and the grantor’s relevant timelines helps the attorney assess the evidence and likely strategy. Early collection of these materials streamlines the initial meeting and positions the trustee to pursue an efficient path forward. For Casa Conejo residents, assembling comprehensive documentation in advance supports a focused and cost-effective review of Heggstad petition options.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas