A Heggstad petition can resolve a frustrating situation when a trustmaker intended trust property to pass to a revocable living trust but formal title to an asset was never updated. Clients in El Rio and Ventura County turn to the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for clear guidance when property transfers to a trust are in question. This page explains how a Heggstad petition works, what evidence is typically needed, and what to expect from the court process. Our goal is to help you understand options, timelines, and likely outcomes so you can make informed decisions when trust administration encounters hiccups.
Many people assume placing an asset in a trust is completed when a document is signed, but title transfer steps are often overlooked. A Heggstad petition asks a court to recognize that ownership of certain assets belongs to the trust despite missing formal deeds or account retitling. For family members, trustees, and personal representatives in El Rio, the petition provides a judicial path to confirm trust ownership and clear title. This resource outlines the evidence courts look for, the steps to file a petition, and practical measures to minimize delay and expense when addressing trust transfer issues locally.
A Heggstad petition can protect beneficiaries and trustees by securing a court judgment that recognizes trust ownership of property despite a defect in title. This legal remedy prevents future disputes over who owns an asset and reduces the risk of probate-related complications or creditor challenges. In addition, a favorable ruling can enable trustees to manage, sell, or distribute trust property without interruption. For those administering an estate or trust in Ventura County, pursuing a petition can be a practical way to preserve the settlor’s intentions and ensure assets are handled according to the trust terms.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients with estate planning and trust administration matters across California, including Ventura County and El Rio. Our approach focuses on thorough preparation, careful documentation review, and clear communication with clients and the court. We work to gather the necessary evidence supporting a finding that assets were intended to be trust property and present that information persuasively to the court. Our practice emphasizes practical solutions to help trustees and family members move forward while protecting the interests of beneficiaries and honoring the settlor’s wishes.
A Heggstad petition asks a probate court to declare that certain property is trust property even when formal transfer steps were not completed. To succeed, the petition typically must show the settlor intended the asset to be held by the trust and took actions consistent with that intention. Courts look to documents, witness testimony, account statements, correspondence, and any actions taken by the settlor or trustee that reflect trust ownership. Understanding the types of proof that courts accept helps petitioners prepare a petition that addresses likely challenges and clarifies the legal basis for declaring property as part of the trust.
The petition process includes drafting a formal filing, serving interested parties, and presenting evidence at a hearing. It may be possible to reach agreements with family members or beneficiaries before court intervention, which can simplify the path forward. When disputes arise, the court evaluates evidence under California probate rules and caselaw, including the original Heggstad decision and subsequent interpretations. While timelines vary, careful preparation and clear documentation increase the likelihood of a favorable outcome and reduce the chance of prolonged litigation or further disputes over title.
A Heggstad petition is a legal filing under California law that requests a court order recognizing specific property as owned by a trust despite a missing legal title transfer. The petition is named for a leading case addressing situations where assets were intended for a trust but paperwork was incomplete. The court’s role is to determine whether actions and statements by the settlor, combined with documentary evidence, show a clear intent to transfer the asset to the trust. When successful, the order clarifies ownership and allows trustees or fiduciaries to manage or distribute the property pursuant to the trust document.
A successful petition generally requires proof of the settlor’s intent to place the asset in the trust, evidence of actions taken toward that transfer, and documentation identifying the asset and trust terms. Relevant items include the trust document, deeds, beneficiary designations, account statements showing trustee control, and communications indicating transfer intent. Affidavits from witnesses or parties familiar with the settlor’s intent can strengthen the case. The procedural steps include filing the petition, notifying interested parties, responding to objections, and asking the court to issue an order confirming trust ownership based on the assembled evidence.
Understanding the legal terms commonly used in Heggstad petitions makes the process less daunting. This glossary explains words and concepts frequently encountered in filings and hearings, such as settlor, trustee, trust instrument, title transfer, and quiet title concepts. Familiarity with these terms helps parties prepare documentation and understand court orders. The definitions below are written to assist clients in El Rio and Ventura County who face trust transfer issues, outlining the role each concept plays in proving that property should be recognized as trust assets despite incomplete formal transfers.
The settlor is the person who created the trust and transferred or intended to transfer assets into it. When evaluating a Heggstad petition, the court focuses on the settlor’s intentions as reflected in documents, statements, and actions. Evidence of intent may come from the trust document itself, communications, or conduct demonstrating that the settlor treated the property as trust property. Establishing the settlor’s intent is often the central issue in a petition to have the court recognize ownership of assets by the trust despite omitted formal title changes.
The trust instrument is the formal written document that creates the trust and sets out terms for management, distribution, and trustee authority. In Heggstad matters, the trust instrument helps demonstrate the settlor’s plan for assets and can identify intended distributions or trustee powers. The court reviews the trust instrument alongside other evidence to determine whether assets not formally titled in the trust were nevertheless meant to be part of it. Clear provisions in the trust instrument that correspond with the asset at issue strengthen the case for recognition by the court.
A trustee is an individual or institution appointed to manage trust assets according to the trust instrument and for the benefit of the beneficiaries. In the context of a Heggstad petition, a trustee may petition the court or respond to challenges regarding whether a particular asset is trust property. Evidence that a trustee performed duties consistent with ownership, such as collecting income or managing the asset, can support a finding that the property was intended to be included in the trust despite incomplete title transfer paperwork.
Quiet title actions address disputed ownership by removing clouds on title and establishing clear legal ownership, while a Heggstad petition focuses specifically on recognizing trust ownership when formal transfer steps were not completed. Although both approaches aim to resolve title uncertainty, a Heggstad petition relies on evidence of intent to include the property in a trust rather than traditional quiet title proof. Understanding the distinction helps parties choose the appropriate legal path based on the nature of the ownership concern and available documentary support.
When property intended for a trust lacks formal title transfer, there are several possible legal remedies, including a Heggstad petition, quiet title action, or negotiated settlement among beneficiaries. A Heggstad petition is particularly tailored to trust-related transfers and emphasizes the settlor’s intent. Quiet title actions take a broader approach to resolving competing claims to property. Negotiated solutions can save time and expense when parties agree. The best option depends on the facts, the strength of documentary evidence, and whether parties are willing to cooperate or contest ownership in court.
If the settlor left clear written instructions or the trust instrument explicitly covers the asset at issue, it may be possible to resolve the matter informally without a contested hearing. Correspondence, account statements showing a trustee designation, or contemporaneous notes indicating the settlor intended the trust to own the property can persuade interested parties to accept an informal resolution. When documentation is strong and family members are cooperative, filing a simpler petition or preparing a stipulation for court approval can resolve title concerns more quickly and with less expense than a full contested matter.
When beneficiaries, trustees, and other interested parties agree on ownership and agree to the terms for managing or distributing the asset, it may be feasible to submit a stipulated order to the court or to provide a declaration supporting the trust claim. Such agreements can significantly reduce litigation costs and accelerate resolution. Courts generally favor settlements that reflect the settlor’s intent and avoid unnecessary dispute, so cooperation among parties often leads to a streamlined path to recognition of trust property without protracted hearings.
Comprehensive legal assistance is often necessary when ownership is disputed, heirs contest the trust’s claim, or there are competing probate or creditor claims that complicate title issues. In such situations, careful documentary investigation, preparation of detailed declarations, and court advocacy are important to present a persuasive case. Counsel can coordinate evidence gathering, advise on procedural strategy, and represent the trustee or interested parties at hearings to ensure the petition is thoroughly supported and any objections are addressed effectively.
When assets involve multiple owners, liens, mortgages, retirement accounts, or third-party interests, resolving title questions can be complex and may require interaction with lenders, financial institutions, or government agencies. Comprehensive legal assistance helps identify encumbrances, coordinate communications with third parties, and prepare pleadings that address all relevant claims. In cases where asset records are incomplete or where transfers involve multiple steps, thorough representation ensures that the court receives a complete factual record supporting recognition of the trust’s interest.
A comprehensive approach to a Heggstad petition reduces the likelihood of overlooked evidence or procedural missteps that can delay resolution. By compiling a thorough evidentiary record, preparing clear declarations, and addressing potential objections in advance, petitioners increase the chance of a timely order confirming trust ownership. This method also helps trustees fulfill fiduciary duties and provides beneficiaries with clarity and confidence that assets will be managed or distributed according to the settlor’s intent. A well-prepared filing can avoid multiple court appearances and subsequent disputes.
Taking a methodical approach can preserve estate value by minimizing litigation costs and preventing unnecessary delays in administration. When records are complete and issues anticipated, the court’s review is more straightforward and the likelihood of successful recognition is higher. Comprehensive preparation includes reviewing related estate documents such as wills, beneficiary designations, and any prior transfers to ensure consistency across documents. This level of care supports smoother administration and helps maintain family relationships by reducing friction during settlement and distribution.
A successful Heggstad petition that is well-supported by documentation and witness declarations can solidify title and reduce future challenges to ownership. When the court issues an order recognizing trust property, subsequent disputes are less likely to succeed because the judgment provides authoritative clarification. This protective effect is particularly valuable for assets that will be sold, refinanced, or otherwise transferred, as clear title reduces transaction friction and liability risk. Solid preparation addresses potential counterclaims and strengthens the legal record for long-term peace of mind.
When trust ownership issues are resolved efficiently through a well-constructed petition, trustees can proceed with management or distribution without prolonged uncertainty. This speed benefits beneficiaries who may depend on timely access to assets or income, and it prevents administrative tasks from stalling. Predictability in the process also helps trustees meet fiduciary timelines and reduces the chance of additional court interventions. Investing time in comprehensive preparation often yields smoother administration and fewer downstream complications for both trustees and beneficiaries.
Begin by collecting the trust document, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, and any correspondence that reflects the settlor’s intent to transfer the asset into the trust. Documentation showing the settlor acting in a way that treats the property as trust property is particularly helpful. If records are incomplete, identify witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s intent or actions. A well-organized packet of documents makes it easier to draft a persuasive petition and can significantly shorten the court’s review time, helping to reduce overall delay and expense.
Courts understand that transfer formalities are sometimes overlooked, but successful petitions require a credible explanation of why title was not formally changed and why the settlor still intended the asset to be held by the trust. Prepare declarations that describe the settlor’s intentions, any actions taken toward transfer, and the timing of those actions. Anticipating likely questions and providing clear, factual context helps the court assess the petition. Demonstrating a consistent pattern of behavior or contemporaneous documents that align with the trust’s terms strengthens the case for recognition.
People pursue a Heggstad petition to clarify ownership when formal title transfer was inadvertently omitted or when assets were intended to be held by a trust but paperwork is incomplete. Filing can prevent probate complications, facilitate the trustee’s ability to manage or sell assets, and protect beneficiaries from uncertainty. This remedy is particularly helpful where the settlor clearly intended trust ownership but failed to execute deeds or retitle accounts. A petition offers a judicial path to confirm that intent, reduce administrative friction, and allow distributions consistent with the trust.
Another reason to consider a petition is to resolve disputes among heirs or co-owners that otherwise might lead to protracted litigation. When parties disagree about whether property belongs to the trust, a court determination provides finality and helps prevent recurring conflicts. Additionally, when third-party institutions require court clarification to accept trust authority over an asset, an order recognizing trust ownership can clear the way for transactions such as sales, transfers, or account changes, enabling trustees to carry out their duties without unnecessary delays.
Typical circumstances include a deed that was not recorded, an investment or bank account not retitled into the trust, or personal property that was intended to be distributed via trust terms but lacks documentation. In other situations, the settlor may have prepared and funded the trust but never completed signing or recording steps for a particular asset. Disputes may also arise when there are conflicting beneficiary designations or when creditors claim rights that require court resolution. In these scenarios, a Heggstad petition can provide the legal recognition needed to proceed with trust administration.
An unrecorded deed can leave real estate in an uncertain position even though the settlor intended it to be trust property. When a deed was prepared but never recorded, the court may review surrounding evidence of intent and actions to determine whether the property belongs to the trust. Showing that the settlor discussed trust ownership, signed related documents, or took steps consistent with trust management can support the petition. Addressing unrecorded deeds promptly helps prevent disputes and clarifies title for future transactions.
Retitling bank or investment accounts is a common administrative step that can be missed. When accounts remain in the settlor’s name but were intended to be trust assets, trustees may have trouble accessing funds or transferring ownership. Documents such as account statements, trustee correspondence, or beneficiary instructions that reflect the settlor’s intent can support a petition. The court can then issue an order recognizing the trust’s interest, enabling trustees to manage accounts and distribute funds consistent with the trust terms.
Personal property, collectibles, or gifts intended for the trust sometimes lack formal documentation and can become the subject of dispute. Evidence such as notes, witness statements, or contemporaneous actions indicating the settlor treated the property as trust assets helps establish intent. A petition can ask the court to recognize these items as part of the trust, allowing trustees to account for and distribute them properly. Addressing undocumented transfers with clear factual records reduces family conflict and supports orderly trust administration.
If you are facing title uncertainty in El Rio, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman can help evaluate whether a Heggstad petition or another remedy is appropriate. We review trust documents, asset records, and any communications that shed light on the settlor’s intent. Our process includes identifying potential obstacles, advising on evidentiary needs, and explaining likely timelines and outcomes. We assist trustees and interested parties in preparing a clear filing and in pursuing a resolution that protects beneficiaries and clarifies ownership so administration can proceed.
Clients choose the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for thoughtful, practical guidance on trust and estate administration problems. We focus on preparing thorough documentation and presenting clear arguments to the court to support recognition of trust property when formal transfers are missing. Our approach emphasizes communication with clients and other interested parties, careful evidence gathering, and responsiveness throughout the filing and hearing process. We aim to provide clarity, reduce friction, and facilitate timely resolution tailored to each family’s circumstances.
When family dynamics or third-party institutions complicate title questions, having experienced counsel to coordinate documentation and legal filings can make the process more efficient. We help clients understand the types of evidence most persuasive to the court, craft supporting declarations, and seek agreements when possible to avoid unnecessary litigation. For trustees who must act within fiduciary obligations, our firm helps balance legal requirements with practical administration needs, working to protect beneficiaries’ interests while advancing the trust’s objectives.
Our representation extends to negotiating with institutions, preparing stipulated orders when parties agree, and litigating contested issues when necessary. We aim to keep clients informed and engaged at each step, focusing on solutions that align with the settlor’s wishes and the applicable law. Whether the matter involves a single account, real property, or a complex asset with multiple parties, we seek to streamline the path to a court order that clarifies ownership and permits trustees to carry out their duties smoothly.
Our process begins with a thorough intake and document review to identify the strongest evidence of the settlor’s intent. We then outline a strategy, prepare the necessary petition and declarations, and handle service to interested parties. If the matter can be resolved by stipulation, we pursue that path; if not, we prepare for a hearing with clear, organized evidence and testimony. Throughout, we keep clients informed about procedural steps, likely timelines, and potential outcomes so they can make reasoned choices at every stage.
The initial phase focuses on assembling the trust document, asset records, communications, and any witness contacts that can support the claim of trust ownership. We examine deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, and related materials to determine the most persuasive evidence and identify any gaps requiring explanation. This stage also involves assessing whether interested parties might cooperate and whether alternative resolutions are feasible. Comprehensive document review ensures the petition is grounded in a clear factual foundation.
We guide clients through collecting relevant documents, including the trust instrument, deeds, titles, account statements, and correspondence reflecting the settlor’s intent. Where records are missing, we identify potential witnesses and secondary sources such as transaction histories or broker notes. Properly organizing these materials helps create a compelling narrative for the court and reduces the risk of missed evidence. Gathering complete documentation at the outset streamlines the next steps and enhances the clarity of the petition.
After collecting records, we assess whether a Heggstad petition is the best remedy versus alternatives such as quiet title or settlement. This evaluation considers the strength of available evidence, the number of interested parties, and potential objections. We then recommend a procedural approach designed to address likely challenges and to pursue the most efficient route to recognition of trust ownership. Clear analysis helps clients understand risks and expected timelines before filing the petition.
Once evidence is organized and a strategy chosen, we draft the petition and supporting declarations, ensuring that each factual assertion is supported by documents or witness statements. We prepare required notices and filings for the probate court and coordinate service to interested parties. Attention to procedural detail at this stage reduces the likelihood of delays caused by technical defects and positions the petition for careful judicial review. Proper filing establishes the formal record for the court to consider.
Declarations provide factual narratives that link documents to the settlor’s intent, describing actions the settlor took and the context for the asset transfer. We prepare exhibits that include copies of the trust, deeds, account statements, and any communications supporting the claim. Clear, well-indexed exhibits make it easier for the court to verify facts and understand the sequence of events. Effective presentation of declarations and exhibits is essential to persuading the court that the asset belongs to the trust.
After filing, we ensure that all required notices and service documents are delivered to beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested parties in accordance with court rules. Proper service preserves the court’s jurisdiction and allows parties the opportunity to respond. Timely and accurate service helps prevent procedural challenges and supports a smoother path to resolution. We handle the logistics of filing and service so clients can focus on gathering any additional supporting information.
If the matter proceeds to a hearing, we prepare witnesses, organize exhibits, and develop clear arguments demonstrating the settlor’s intent and the legal basis for the requested order. Preparation includes anticipating objections, briefing relevant law, and assembling a concise record for the judge. Clear courtroom presentation helps the court understand the factual and legal rationales supporting recognition of trust ownership. If parties reach a stipulation, we prepare the agreed order for the court’s consideration to avoid contested hearings when possible.
We assist witnesses in crafting declarations that accurately recount the settlor’s statements or actions without leading language, and we prepare them for questions they may face in a court setting. Witness accounts that consistently describe intent and actions taken toward trust funding strengthen the petition. Proper preparation ensures testimony is clear, credible, and aligned with documentary evidence. This coherence between witness statements and exhibits greatly assists the court in evaluating the petition.
During the hearing, we present the factual record and legal arguments supporting recognition of trust ownership, and we respond to any objections raised by other parties. Addressing concerns about missing formalities or competing claims requires focused legal explanations and evidentiary support. We work to highlight the pattern of conduct and documentary proof that demonstrate the settlor’s intent. By presenting a well-organized case, we aim to assist the court in reaching a clear, enforceable order that resolves title uncertainty and allows administration to proceed.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing that asks the probate court to declare that an asset belongs to a trust even though formal title transfer steps were not completed. It is used when the settlor intended the asset to be trust property but deeds, account retitling, or other formalities were omitted. The petition presents evidence of the settlor’s intent and actions that show the asset was meant to be included in the trust, allowing the court to order recognition of trust ownership so the trustee can manage or distribute the property according to the trust’s terms. This remedy is particularly relevant when informal transfers or administrative oversights have left title in the settlor’s name, and when beneficiaries or trustees need clear legal authority to proceed. By seeking a court determination, petitioners aim to avoid future disputes, enable transactions involving the asset, and clarify responsibilities for trustees and heirs. The court evaluates documentary and testimonial evidence to determine whether the trust claim should be recognized under applicable law.
Courts consider a range of documentary and testimonial evidence, including the trust instrument, deeds, account statements, beneficiary designations, correspondence, and contemporaneous notes that indicate transfer intent. Declarations from witnesses or parties familiar with the settlor’s actions can be persuasive, as can records showing trustee control or management of the asset. The court looks for consistent indications that the settlor intended the asset to be held by the trust, and for actions that align with that intent, such as designating a trustee or directing distributions according to the trust. While the precise mix of evidence varies, stronger cases present multiple supporting items that corroborate each other. Financial institution records, signed documents, and credible witness statements together create a persuasive narrative for the court. Preparing a clear, well-organized evidentiary package improves the chances of a favorable ruling and helps address potential objections from other interested parties.
Timelines vary based on court schedules, the complexity of the issues, and whether the petition is contested. Simple matters resolved by stipulation among parties can move more quickly, sometimes within a few weeks or months, while contested petitions may take several months to reach a hearing and receive an order. Preparation time for gathering evidence and drafting the petition also affects the timeline, as does the need for service and any required waiting periods for objections. Unanticipated complications such as disputes over ownership, missing documentation, or third-party claims can extend the process. Early, thorough preparation and efforts to reach agreement with interested parties often shorten the timeline. Working closely with counsel to anticipate necessary evidence and procedural steps helps manage expectations for how long the matter may take to resolve in Ventura County.
Yes, a Heggstad petition can sometimes be resolved without a contested hearing if interested parties agree to a stipulated order or to filing documents that the court can approve administratively. Cooperation among trustees, beneficiaries, and heirs can enable the parties to present a joint request for recognition of trust ownership, which reduces costs and avoids courtroom proceedings. Reaching a stipulation requires clear documentation and mutual acceptance of the facts, but it is often the most efficient way to obtain the needed court recognition. When parties do not agree, the matter proceeds to a hearing where the court evaluates evidence and hears objections. Even in contested situations, pre-filing communications and negotiations can narrow issues and reduce hearing time. It is generally advisable to attempt to resolve disagreements through dialogue before pursuing full litigation when possible.
When filing a Heggstad petition, the petitioner must notify all interested parties as required by probate rules. This typically includes beneficiaries named in the trust, heirs at law, named fiduciaries such as trustees and personal representatives, and any parties who may have a legal interest in the property. Proper notice ensures that those affected have an opportunity to respond and preserves the court’s authority to make a binding determination regarding the asset’s ownership. Failing to provide required notice can result in procedural defects that delay the case or jeopardize the ultimate order. Counsel will identify the appropriate parties and ensure service is performed in accordance with court procedures. Transparent communication and correct service promote fairness and reduce the risk of later challenges based on lack of notice.
If an interested party objects to a Heggstad petition, the court will allow the objecting party to present evidence and arguments challenging the petition’s basis. Objections may assert competing ownership claims, question the sufficiency of evidence of the settlor’s intent, or raise issues about liens or creditor rights. The court will evaluate the objections alongside the petitioner’s evidence and decide whether an order recognizing trust ownership is warranted. Objecting parties may request additional discovery or hearings to explore disputed facts. Resolving objections often involves focused legal and factual responses, such as producing additional documentation or identifying witnesses who corroborate the settlor’s intent. In some cases, negotiation or mediation can resolve objections without a full hearing. When objections persist, preparing a robust evidentiary record and clear legal argument is essential to addressing the contested issues at the court hearing.
A court order recognizing trust ownership generally clarifies the interest of the trust in the asset, but it does not automatically eliminate valid liens or creditor claims that predate the order. Creditors with existing encumbrances may retain their rights unless the court’s order addresses those specific claims. When liens or mortgages exist, the petition and supporting documents should disclose such encumbrances so the court can consider their impact on recognition of ownership and on the ability to transfer or sell the asset. If creditors are potential claimants, parties may need to address those obligations in the petition or in separate proceedings. Consulting with counsel about how liens, mortgages, or pending creditor claims interact with a Heggstad petition helps clarify whether additional steps are needed to protect the trust’s interests and to resolve encumbrances before transactions involving the property occur.
Trustees have standing to file a Heggstad petition to protect trust assets and to obtain the court authority needed to manage or distribute property. When trustees act in their fiduciary capacity, they can present evidence showing the settlor’s intent and explain why recognition of trust ownership is necessary for proper administration. The court evaluates the trustee’s showing just as it would any petitioner’s, focusing on documentation and witness statements that support the claim that the asset was meant to be trust property. Beneficiaries also may have a role in seeking resolution if they are affected by title uncertainty, but trustees are typically the appropriate fiduciaries to initiate petitions on behalf of the trust. Trustees should document their efforts to gather evidence and to communicate with beneficiaries, as this record supports both the petition and fulfillment of fiduciary duties during administration.
Alternatives to filing a Heggstad petition include negotiating a settlement with interested parties, preparing a stipulated order for court approval, or pursuing a quiet title action if the issue involves broader ownership disputes. Negotiation and stipulation are often the most cost-effective options when parties can agree on the facts and the appropriate remedy. Quiet title actions address competing claims to property more broadly and may be appropriate when the dispute extends beyond trust-related transfer issues. Choosing the best alternative depends on the strength of available evidence, the willingness of parties to cooperate, and the presence of third-party claims or encumbrances. A careful review of the facts and discussion with counsel will help determine whether a Heggstad petition or another approach best achieves clear, durable resolution of title questions.
Preparing to support a Heggstad petition involves gathering the trust document, deeds, account statements, and any correspondence or notes that show the settlor’s intent to include the asset in the trust. Identify witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s statements or actions, and collect records that demonstrate trustee actions related to the asset. Organizing documents chronologically and preparing concise summaries of key facts helps the court evaluate the petition efficiently and shows a clear factual narrative supporting recognition of trust ownership. It is also helpful to identify any potential objections or third-party interests early and to document efforts to notify or negotiate with interested parties. Being proactive about collecting evidence and communicating with affected individuals can reduce disputes and increase the likelihood of resolving the matter through a stipulated order or a streamlined hearing.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas