A Heggstad Petition is a court procedure used to have real property recognized as belonging to a trust when the title or deed was not properly transferred. For residents of Mira Monte and Ventura County, this process can be essential to complete an estate plan and avoid probate for assets that should already be governed by a living trust. The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients with assessing whether a Heggstad Petition is appropriate, gathering supporting evidence, and presenting a clear case to the court so that trust property is properly acknowledged and estate administration proceeds as intended.
Many families discover a gap between their estate planning documents and recorded property ownership only when a trusted person passes away or during a property transaction. A Heggstad Petition provides a judicial remedy to fix that gap without the need to open probate, which can be time consuming and costly. Our approach involves careful documentation of the trust terms, proof of intent, and evidence showing that the trust owner intended the property to be part of the trust. We help clients in Mira Monte by explaining options, preparing petitions, and advocating for a straightforward court determination.
When a property intended to be held in a living trust remains in the decedent’s name, it can undermine the goals of avoiding probate and ensuring a smooth transfer to intended beneficiaries. Filing a Heggstad Petition can restore alignment between the trust documents and recorded title by obtaining a court declaration that the property is trust property. This remedy helps families save time and reduce costs associated with formal probate administration. For Mira Monte residents, achieving clear title through a Heggstad Petition preserves privacy, accelerates distribution to beneficiaries, and helps carry out the deceased’s estate planning objectives with less delay and public oversight.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman represents individuals and families across Ventura County in trust administration and related court proceedings, including Heggstad Petitions. We focus on clear communication, thorough document review, and practical legal solutions tailored to each client’s objectives. Our legal team guides clients through evidence gathering, drafting the petition, and court procedures while keeping clients informed at every step. For those in Mira Monte, we combine local knowledge with careful attention to trust law and court practices to help secure a favorable outcome that honors the settlor’s intent and protects beneficiaries’ interests.
A Heggstad Petition asks the probate court to recognize that specific real property belongs to a trust even though the public record lists the property in the decedent’s individual name. The petition typically includes the trust document, affidavits or declarations describing the circumstances, and supporting evidence of the settlor’s intent to include the property in the trust. Courts review the documentation and may hold a hearing before issuing an order that corrects the record. This legal pathway is often used when a deed was inadvertently not transferred but the trust clearly demonstrates ownership intent.
The process begins with a thorough review of trust instruments, title records, and any communications or actions that show intent to fund the trust. In some cases, the court will accept sworn statements from trustees, beneficiaries, or other witnesses to corroborate the claim that the property should be treated as trust property. The Heggstad Petition may be faster and less expensive than formal probate, but it still requires careful preparation. Timely action is important to preserve property values, to avoid disputes among heirs, and to ensure that the trust administration proceeds according to the settlor’s plan.
A Heggstad Petition is a judicial declaration sought under California law to have property treated as if it had been transferred to a trust, despite the absence of a recorded deed showing the transfer. It arises from situations where the settlor intended to fund a living trust but the paperwork or recording steps were not completed before death or incapacity. The court examines the trust document and other proof of intent to determine whether the property should be considered trust property. This remedy helps complete the settlor’s plan and frequently avoids the need for probate court administration of that asset.
Successful Heggstad Petitions rely on documentation showing the trust’s terms, evidence demonstrating the settlor’s intent, and proof of who acted as trustee. Typical supporting items include the trust instrument, deeds, bank records, witness declarations, and correspondence. The process involves filing the petition with the probate court, serving interested parties, and possibly attending a hearing if objections arise. Preparing a clear and organized petition increases the likelihood of a favorable court order that allows title to be corrected to reflect the trust ownership and enables administration consistent with the settlor’s plan.
Understanding the terminology used in trust and probate matters helps clients make informed decisions during the Heggstad Petition process. Key terms include trust, settlor, trustee, beneficiary, deed, probate, and funding. Each term reflects a specific role or procedural step that influences how property is managed and transferred. Clear definitions and examples can demystify the legal framework, helping property owners and family members identify actions needed to correct title issues and protect intended distributions under a living trust. Familiarity with these terms leads to better planning and reduced risk of disputes.
A trust is a legal arrangement where a person, known as the settlor or grantor, transfers assets to be managed for the benefit of named beneficiaries according to written instructions. A living trust allows the settlor to remain in control of assets during life while providing a mechanism for property distribution upon death without the need for probate for assets properly titled in the trust’s name. Trusts can include provisions for asset management, incapacity planning, and specific distribution goals, and they are often used to maintain privacy, reduce administrative delay, and simplify the transfer of property to heirs.
A Heggstad Petition is a court filing that asks a probate or superior court to declare that specific property is part of a trust despite the recorded title indicating otherwise. The petition is named after a landmark California case that established the principle allowing courts to recognize trust ownership based on the settlor’s intent. The petition must present convincing evidence that the property was intended to be placed in the trust, such as the trust document, related deeds, bank statements, or witness declarations. If the court grants the petition, it issues an order allowing title to be corrected to reflect trust ownership.
A deed is a legal instrument used to transfer ownership of real property from one party to another. The deed should be recorded in the county where the property is located to provide public notice of ownership. When a settlor intends for real property to be held in a living trust, a deed transferring the property into the trust is typically prepared and recorded. Failure to record an appropriate deed can result in the property remaining in the settlor’s individual name, which may require a Heggstad Petition to have the court recognize the property as trust property after the settlor’s death.
Probate is the court-supervised process for administering a decedent’s estate when assets are titled solely in the decedent’s name without an effective transfer mechanism such as a properly funded trust. Probate can involve validating wills, appointing personal representatives, inventorying assets, paying debts and taxes, and distributing property to heirs. Avoiding probate is a common reason for establishing a living trust and for seeking a Heggstad Petition when title conflicts arise, because the petition can enable assets to be distributed according to the trust terms without the time and expense associated with a probate administration.
When property intended for a trust remains in the decedent’s name, families face choices about resolving title issues. A Heggstad Petition seeks a court declaration that the property should be treated as trust property and can often avoid full probate administration for that asset. By contrast, probate opens a formal estate process which is public and may take longer and cost more in fees. Evaluating the specifics of the property, the clarity of the trust documents, and potential objections from heirs helps determine whether a Heggstad Petition or probate is the more appropriate path for Mira Monte residents.
A limited approach through a Heggstad Petition is often sufficient when the trust document clearly identifies the property and when there is corroborating evidence of intent to fund the trust. Examples of supporting proof include an unrecorded deed prepared before death, bank statements showing trust funding, or signed declarations from the settlor indicating the property was to be transferred to the trust. When these elements are present and no credible objections are anticipated from beneficiaries or creditors, a focused petition can efficiently resolve title without opening a full probate administration.
A Heggstad Petition is most effective when interested parties, such as beneficiaries and potential heirs, either support the petition or do not contest it. If family members are in agreement or indifferent about honoring the trust terms, the court can review the documentation and issue a declaration recognizing the property as trust property. This streamlined path minimizes court involvement and legal expenses, helping families in Mira Monte preserve assets and implement the settlor’s wishes with less delay and fewer adversarial proceedings than a contested probate case would require.
Comprehensive legal representation may be necessary when a Heggstad Petition faces objections or when trust documents are ambiguous about ownership. Disputes can arise over intent, the validity of the trust, or competing claims from heirs or creditors. In those circumstances, a more expansive approach that includes formal discovery, negotiation, and litigation readiness helps protect the interests of trustees and beneficiaries. Preparing for potential challenges involves gathering stronger evidence, engaging in strategic communication with opposing parties, and being prepared to present a thorough case in court to secure a favorable resolution.
When multiple properties or assets with complex title histories are involved, a comprehensive plan is often required to address each item and to coordinate funding of the trust. Complicated ownership chains, co-ownership issues, or properties subject to liens or mortgages require careful legal analysis and coordinated action. In these cases, a full assessment and coordinated filings—potentially including deeds, petitions, and related actions—ensure that all assets are addressed consistently, reducing the risk of future disputes or unintended probate for assets that the settlor intended to be part of the trust.
A comprehensive legal approach when dealing with trust funding problems can provide peace of mind by addressing not only the specific property at issue but also related assets and potential legal complications. This holistic outlook identifies issues before they escalate and builds a stronger record to support petitions or other filings. For families in Mira Monte, taking a broader view can help harmonize documentation across real estate, financial accounts, and other titled property, thereby reducing the chance of future disputes and ensuring that the settlor’s distribution plan is implemented predictably and with fewer interruptions.
By coordinating deed corrections, trust amendments, and court petitions where necessary, a comprehensive plan reduces administrative burdens on trustees and beneficiaries and minimizes public exposure of private estate matters. This approach also allows for strategic timing of filings, consideration of tax or creditor implications, and proactive communication with heirs. Ultimately, a considered, comprehensive approach helps preserve estate value, protect beneficiary expectations, and foster smoother administration consistent with the settlor’s intent, while addressing all legal and practical aspects associated with trust-owned property.
A comprehensive strategy builds a thorough evidentiary foundation that strengthens legal positions and reduces the likelihood of future challenges. By assembling trust documents, deeds, financial records, and witness declarations, trustees can present a cohesive narrative that demonstrates the settlor’s intent. This preparation helps avoid ambiguity that might otherwise invite litigation. For residents of Mira Monte, creating clarity around property ownership and trust funding minimizes the chance of prolonged disputes among heirs, leading to a more predictable and less adversarial administration of the estate.
When all relevant documents and actions are coordinated, the administration of trust assets can proceed more quickly and with fewer interruptions. A comprehensive plan anticipates potential complications and addresses them early, which can reduce the need for follow-up court interventions. Faster resolution benefits beneficiaries who rely on timely distributions and protects the overall estate value by minimizing legal fees and administrative costs. For families in Mira Monte, this means carrying out the settlor’s wishes more efficiently and preserving assets for their intended purposes.
Start by assembling all relevant documents that reflect the settlor’s intent to fund a trust, including the trust instrument, any deeds or unrecorded transfer documents, bank statements showing trust transactions, and written communications that reference the property being placed in the trust. Affidavits or declarations from witnesses or the trustee that describe the settlor’s actions and statements can strengthen the petition. Clear, organized documentation makes it easier to prepare a persuasive petition and can significantly shorten the court’s review process, helping to correct title more efficiently.
Early communication with beneficiaries, potential heirs, and other interested parties can reduce misunderstandings and lessen the likelihood of contested proceedings. Explaining the purpose of a Heggstad Petition and sharing the supporting documentation often encourages cooperation and can expedite the court’s determination. If disputes are expected, documenting communications and the reasons for decisions will be useful during any contested process. Clear, respectful dialogue helps families focus on honoring the settlor’s intentions and on resolving property issues efficiently.
If you discover that real property intended for a living trust remains titled in the settlor’s name, a Heggstad Petition can be an effective way to have the court declare the property as trust-owned. This process avoids formal probate for that property, preserves privacy, and can reduce legal costs and delays associated with estate administration. For families in Mira Monte, pursuing a Heggstad Petition helps ensure that the settlor’s distribution plan is followed, enabling beneficiaries to receive property according to the trust terms rather than through a potentially lengthy probate proceeding.
A petition is especially valuable when the trust documents are clear but recording errors or oversights left certain assets out of the trust’s title. Filing promptly can prevent third-party claims, protect property values, and reduce uncertainty for trustees and beneficiaries. Even if other assets proceed through different channels, resolving title for trust-intended property helps streamline overall estate administration and aligns the legal record with the settlor’s wishes, offering practical benefits for families in Ventura County and the surrounding communities.
Typical circumstances include when a deed to transfer property into a trust was drafted but never recorded, when the settlor believed the trust had been funded but the title was never updated, or when property was purchased with trust funds yet recorded in the individual’s name. Other scenarios involve clerical errors, transfers completed close to the settlor’s death, or situations where trustees or family members discover inconsistencies during trust administration. Identifying the root cause helps determine whether a Heggstad Petition is appropriate and what evidence will be needed to support the request.
Sometimes a deed transferring property into a trust was prepared and signed but not recorded before the settlor’s death, leaving the property in the decedent’s name on public record. In such cases, the trust document and other contemporaneous evidence may show the settlor’s intent to fund the trust, making a Heggstad Petition an effective remedy. The petition asks the court to recognize the trust’s ownership despite the lack of recorded title, enabling the trustee to manage or distribute the property according to the trust terms while avoiding probate for that asset.
There are instances where property was purchased using funds designated for the trust or where the settlor treated the asset as trust property, but the deed was recorded in the individual’s name. When financial records, purchase documents, or other evidence show that the settlor intended the property to belong to the trust, a Heggstad Petition may be filed to align the title with that intent. This petition assists trustees in asserting authority over the property and helps beneficiaries receive distributions consistent with the settlor’s planning.
Clerical errors, missed steps, or misunderstandings during the trust funding process can leave assets improperly titled. Oversights like failing to record a deed, misnaming the trust on a deed, or neglecting to transfer an account into the trust are common triggers for a Heggstad Petition. Identifying the administrative lapse and documenting the settlor’s intent through available records can enable the court to correct the title, allowing trustees to administer those assets under the trust rather than subjecting them to probate administration.
Residents of Mira Monte and Ventura County can turn to the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for assistance with Heggstad Petitions and related trust matters. We provide personalized guidance on assessing documentation, preparing petitions, and communicating with interested parties to facilitate a favorable court declaration. By focusing on clear evidence and efficient procedures, we aim to help families correct title issues with minimal disruption, protecting the settlor’s plan while reducing administrative costs and delays that often accompany contested probate proceedings.
Our firm combines practical knowledge of trust administration with careful case preparation tailored to the needs of Mira Monte clients. We prioritize thorough fact-finding to identify the strongest supporting evidence for a petition, coordinate communication with beneficiaries and other parties, and prepare clear court filings. This focused approach helps clients move efficiently from discovery to resolution while protecting the legal rights and interests of trustees and beneficiaries. We aim to reduce unnecessary delays and to secure a court order that aligns recorded title with the settlor’s trust.
We emphasize transparent communication throughout the process, explaining legal options, likely timelines, and potential outcomes so clients can make informed decisions. Our team works to minimize surprises by anticipating common objections and preparing a strong evidentiary record. For families who prefer to avoid probate or to resolve title issues quickly, our practical approach helps achieve those goals. We work with local Ventura County courts and professionals to streamline filings and to ensure petitions reflect the relevant legal standards and local practices.
Our goal is to help clients in Mira Monte protect their loved ones and preserve assets intended for beneficiaries. We tailor our services to the needs of each case, whether that means a focused petition for a single property or broader coordination involving multiple assets and related filings. By offering clear guidance and attentive case management, we assist trustees and families in carrying out the settlor’s intentions with minimal disruption and expense, while addressing any questions that arise during the process.
Our process begins with a detailed intake to collect trust documents, deeds, and any supporting evidence of the settlor’s intent. We then conduct a title review and identify potential interested parties who must be notified. After preparing the petition and supporting declarations, we file with the appropriate Ventura County court and manage service of process. If no objection is filed, the court may grant the petition on submitted papers; if objections arise, we represent the client at hearings and present the evidence needed to secure a court order recognizing the property as part of the trust.
The first step is a comprehensive review of the trust, deeds, financial records, and any other materials that may support the claim that the property belongs to the trust. This includes identifying the settling party, trustee, beneficiaries, and any encumbrances on the property. We assess the strength of available evidence, determine whether additional declarations or affidavits are needed, and outline a recommended course of action. A clear understanding of the facts and legal issues at the outset sets the stage for an efficient petition preparation and filing.
Collecting evidence involves assembling the trust document, any deeds or title history, bank statements showing trust funding, and communications that reflect the settlor’s intent. We may request signed declarations from the trustee or witnesses who can attest to the settlor’s actions and statements. These documents are organized to present a coherent narrative for the court. Thorough evidence gathering not only supports the petition but also reduces the risk of objections and bolsters the case for prompt court recognition of the property as trust-owned.
A title search uncovers the recorded ownership history and any liens or encumbrances that could affect the petition. Identifying and locating interested parties, such as beneficiaries, heirs, and lienholders, is essential because proper notice is required. We prepare a service plan to notify necessary parties and evaluate whether any outreach or negotiation may prevent contested proceedings. Ensuring accurate title information and notifying the correct individuals reduces procedural delays and sets up the petition for a smoother review by the court.
After compiling the supporting evidence and completing the title review, we draft the Heggstad Petition and supporting declarations. The petition sets out the factual basis and legal authority for declaring the property part of the trust. We prepare all required court forms, attach evidence, and arrange for filing with the appropriate Ventura County court. Service of process is then executed to provide notice to all interested parties, along with instructions on how to respond if they object to the petition. Accurate filings and proper notice are critical to the petition’s success.
Drafting the petition involves presenting the trust terms and evidence in a clear, persuasive manner so the court can readily see the settlor’s intent and the basis for the requested declaration. Supporting declarations explain the circumstances and identify the documentary evidence attached to the filing. We structure filings to address likely questions or concerns upfront, reducing the chance of requests for additional information. Clear, organized pleadings help the court evaluate the matter more efficiently and can lead to a prompt order correcting title to reflect trust ownership.
Proper service of the petition on interested parties is required so that beneficiaries, heirs, and lienholders have the opportunity to object. We manage service to ensure compliance with court rules and track any responses or objections. If objections are raised, we analyze their basis and engage in discussions or negotiations where appropriate to resolve issues without litigation. When necessary, we prepare for court hearings by organizing evidence and testimony to support the petition and to address any contested matters that may arise.
Once the petition has been filed and served, the court reviews the submissions and any responses from interested parties. If the matter is uncontested, the court may grant the petition based on the filed papers and issue an order recognizing the property as trust property. If objections exist, the court may schedule a hearing where evidence is presented and witnesses may be questioned. Upon a favorable judgment, the court’s order allows for correction of recorded title and enables trustees to administer or distribute the property according to the trust.
The court’s order following a granted Heggstad Petition is the authority under which title can be corrected to reflect trust ownership. That order will typically direct the county recorder to accept corrected or substitute documents that align the public record with the trust. With the court’s declaration in hand, trustees can proceed to manage, sell, or distribute the property according to the trust terms. This judicial recognition protects trustees and beneficiaries by clarifying ownership and reducing uncertainty around administration.
After obtaining the court order, the final steps include preparing and recording the documents necessary to update the public record, such as corrected deeds or certified orders. We assist trustees with coordinating recordings, notifying title companies, and resolving any remaining encumbrances that might affect clear transfer. Completing these post-order actions ensures that the property title reflects the court’s decision and that trustees can confidently administer or transfer the asset in accordance with the settlor’s instructions without further legal obstacles.
A Heggstad Petition is a court proceeding asking the court to recognize that specific real property should be treated as trust property even though the recorded title lists the decedent in their individual capacity. The petition presents the trust document and supporting evidence showing the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. If granted, the court issues an order allowing title correction, which may prevent that property from being administered through probate. This remedy helps align the public record with the settlor’s estate plan and can reduce delays and costs for beneficiaries. Filing a petition requires careful preparation of documentation and proper notice to interested parties. When the petition is admitted and the court issues an order, trustees can proceed to record corrected title documents and manage the property under trust authority. While not every situation will avoid probate entirely, for property clearly intended to be in the trust, a successful Heggstad Petition can substantially reduce the need for full probate administration and protect the settlor’s distribution goals.
Evidence commonly used to support a Heggstad Petition includes the trust agreement, any prepared but unrecorded deeds, purchase documents showing trust funds were used, bank records, and written communications reflecting intent to transfer property into the trust. Declarations from trustees, witnesses, or family members who observed the settlor’s actions or heard statements about the intended transfer can be persuasive. A well-documented factual narrative that ties the trust to the property is essential for convincing the court that the asset belongs in the trust. The quality of evidence matters: contemporaneous documents and clear, consistent statements are more compelling than vague recollections. A title review and collection of related records help identify the strongest supporting materials. When documentation is sparse, affidavit testimony and corroborating records become especially important, making early and thorough evidence gathering a key part of the preparation process.
Timelines vary depending on local court procedures, whether the petition is contested, and the readiness of supporting documentation. If the petition is uncontested and the court accepts the filed papers, the matter can often be resolved in a matter of weeks to a few months. When interested parties do not object and the filings are complete, courts may issue orders more quickly, allowing title correction and recording to proceed without extended hearings. If objections arise or additional evidence is required, the process can take longer due to court scheduling and potential hearings. Contested matters may extend for several months or longer, depending on the complexity of title issues and the need for discovery or testimony. Early preparation and clear evidence help expedite the court’s review and reduce the overall timeline for resolution.
A successful Heggstad Petition can prevent probate for the specific property that the court recognizes as belonging to the trust, but it does not automatically alter the status of other assets that remain solely in the decedent’s name. If the property at issue is the only asset impacted, resolving title through the petition can allow that item to be administered under the trust without opening full probate. However, if multiple assets require correction or if substantial issues exist beyond title, other proceedings might still be necessary. It is important to evaluate all assets and documentation to determine whether a petition will be sufficient or if broader estate administration steps are needed. When a petition addresses the core title issue and no additional probate triggers exist, the affected property can often avoid probate administration and instead pass according to the trust terms.
Yes, beneficiaries, heirs, or other interested parties can contest a Heggstad Petition by filing an objection with the court. Common grounds for contesting a petition include disputing the settlor’s intent, questioning the validity of the trust instrument, or alleging that the property was not intended to be included. When objections are filed, the court may schedule a hearing to evaluate evidence and hear testimony before making a determination. Contested matters require careful preparation and may involve negotiation, mediation, or litigation. Promptly gathering strong documentary evidence and clear declarations can reduce the likelihood of successful objections. When contest is anticipated, a more comprehensive approach that anticipates disputes and addresses them early often produces better outcomes for trustees and beneficiaries.
The cost of filing a Heggstad Petition depends on multiple factors including the complexity of the title history, the amount of evidence that needs to be gathered, court filing fees, and whether the petition is contested. Uncontested petitions with clear documentation generally incur lower legal fees and court costs, while contested petitions or those requiring additional investigation and hearings will cost more. Title search fees and recording charges may also apply when correcting the public record. Providing an initial case assessment helps estimate likely costs and timelines. Early organization of documents and clarity around the settlor’s intent can reduce preparation time and associated fees. We discuss fee structures and give clients a realistic projection of potential costs so decisions can be made with a clear understanding of the financial implications.
Liens or mortgages on the property remain in place regardless of whether the property is recognized as trust property by the court. A Heggstad Petition addresses ownership recognition but does not automatically remove encumbrances. Trustees must identify outstanding liens, mortgages, or other claims and address them according to the loan terms or by coordinating payoffs or assumptions that comply with lenders’ requirements. Resolving encumbrances may involve communicating with lenders, negotiating payoffs, or arranging refinancing. Title companies are often involved to ensure that the recorded title is free of unexpected defects before transfers or sales. Addressing liens early in the process helps avoid surprises when recording corrected title documents and ensures that trustees or purchasers have a clear path to manage encumbrances.
Having the original trust document is often important because it clearly shows the settlor’s instructions and the identity of the trustee and beneficiaries. Courts generally prefer to see the trust instrument itself when evaluating a Heggstad Petition. If the original is unavailable, a certified copy or a court-filed copy may be acceptable, along with a credible explanation for the unavailability of the original and additional corroborating evidence to support the trust’s terms. When the original cannot be located, we work to obtain acceptable copies and to compile other supporting documents that demonstrate the trust’s existence and the settlor’s intent. Evidence such as bank statements, notarized copies, or contemporaneous communications can supplement the record and help the court reach a conclusion consistent with the settlor’s plans.
Yes, a Heggstad Petition can apply to property purchased after a trust was created if the purchase and funding were intended to make the property part of the trust but the deed was recorded in the buyer’s individual name. Evidence that trust funds were used, or that the settlor consistently treated the property as trust property, supports a petition. The court focuses on the settlor’s intent to fund the trust and the surrounding facts when evaluating whether the property should be treated as trust-owned. Documentation such as purchase agreements, bank transfers, and communications can help show that the property was meant to be in the trust. If multiple transactions or assets are involved, a coordinated review and filings may be necessary to address each property consistently, especially when title history is complex or when co-ownership interests exist.
To begin, collect the trust document, deeds, purchase records, bank statements, and any written evidence that ties the property to the trust, along with contact information for potential interested parties. An initial consultation helps identify the strengths and gaps in the available evidence and provides an outline of the likely steps, fees, and timeline for filing a Heggstad Petition. We then perform a title search, determine the required notices, and prepare the petition and supporting declarations tailored to the facts of the case. After filing, we manage service of process and monitor any responses. If objections are raised, we represent trustees and beneficiaries in hearings and negotiations. Starting with clear documentation and a focused plan increases the likelihood of a prompt court determination and an efficient correction of title for property intended to be in the trust.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas