A Heggstad petition can be an important legal tool for trustees and family members when trust assets were not properly retitled into the trust during the grantor’s lifetime. In Oxnard and Ventura County, families often discover that homes, bank accounts, or investment accounts remain in a decedent’s name, creating uncertainty about control and distribution. This guide explains how a Heggstad petition works in California courts, what evidence typically supports a petition, and how the process can clarify ownership so the trust administration can move forward without unnecessary delays. It is aimed at helping you evaluate whether a petition is appropriate for your situation.
When facing a possible Heggstad petition, understanding the legal standard and the court’s expectations matters. The petition asks a probate court to determine that certain assets, although titled in the name of the deceased or a transferor, were intended to be part of the trust. Preparing a strong petition usually involves gathering documents such as trust instruments, correspondence, transfer information, and contemporaneous records that show intent to benefit the trust. This section outlines the documentation typically considered and offers practical steps families can take to prepare for the petition hearing in Ventura County courts.
Filing a Heggstad petition can prevent delays and disputes that arise when assets remain improperly titled after a trustmaker’s passing. By asking the court to recognize the trust’s interest, trustees can obtain clear authority to manage or transfer assets according to the trust terms, avoiding extended probate procedures for property that the trust was meant to control. The petition process also helps reduce family disagreements by providing a neutral judicial determination of ownership when documentation or transfer records are incomplete. For many families in Oxnard, a successful petition supports efficient estate administration and preserves the decedent’s intent.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists clients across California with estate planning and trust administration matters, including Heggstad petitions in Ventura County. We focus on providing practical legal guidance tailored to each family’s circumstances, helping trustees compile evidence, prepare court filings, and advocate for clear resolution. Our approach emphasizes thorough documentation, attention to procedural deadlines, and clear communication with clients about likely timelines and outcomes. When assets are at issue, clients can rely on a careful review of trust documents, account records, and relevant correspondence to build a persuasive petition for the court.
A Heggstad petition is grounded in California case law that allows a court to declare that property is trust property despite being titled in the name of the decedent or transferor. This remedy is particularly valuable when the trustmaker intended certain assets to be governed by the trust but formal retitling was not completed. The petition requires evidence demonstrating the trustmaker’s intent and the relationship between the asset and the trust. Knowing how courts evaluate intent and the types of supporting documentation commonly accepted can help trustees and family members determine whether seeking a judicial declaration is the appropriate next step.
In practice, courts in Ventura County may consider a range of evidence to resolve a Heggstad petition, including the trust instrument, financial statements, beneficiary designations, transfer records, and communications that show intent. The procedural steps include preparing a verified petition, serving interested parties, and presenting evidence at a hearing if the matter is contested. Understanding the timeline, potential costs, and possible outcomes helps trustees plan for the administration of the estate. A clear, well-documented petition often leads to a smoother resolution and reduces the risk of future litigation over the same assets.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to recognize that assets titled in the name of the deceased should be considered part of the trust. This remedy arises when formal retitling into the trust did not occur but the trustmaker’s intent to include the asset can be shown through contemporaneous evidence. Courts will evaluate whether the asset was effectively transferred or intended to fund the trust and may issue an order clarifying ownership for trust administration. The petition is a targeted method to align the trust’s terms with actual asset control, preventing unnecessary probate and clarifying the trustee’s authority to act.
When reviewing a Heggstad petition, courts typically focus on evidence demonstrating the trustmaker’s intent and any actions taken to transfer the asset to the trust. Helpful elements include the trust document itself, bank or account statements, transfer confirmations, deeds, beneficiary designation forms, and written correspondence indicating intent. Courts may also consider testimony about customary estate planning practices and any reasons transfers were not completed. Preparing exhibits and organizing a clear narrative that ties the asset to the trust’s purpose improves the likelihood of a favorable ruling and reduces the chances of contested litigation among beneficiaries.
Understanding common terms related to Heggstad petitions helps trustees and family members navigate the process. Terms such as trustee, grantor, trust instrument, retitling, probate, and beneficiary designations are frequently used in court filings and hearings. Clarifying these definitions early in the process helps set expectations about legal procedures and documents to collect. This glossary explains each term in clear language, making it easier to assemble the evidence needed for a petition and to communicate effectively with the court and other interested parties during trust administration.
A trustee is the person or entity appointed in a trust document to hold and manage trust assets on behalf of the beneficiaries. The trustee’s responsibilities typically include locating assets, managing investments, paying debts and expenses, and distributing property according to the trust’s terms. In the context of a Heggstad petition, the trustee may petition the court to declare that certain assets belong to the trust so that they can be properly administered. Trustees must act in accordance with the trust terms and applicable law while keeping beneficiaries informed of material actions and decisions.
Retitling refers to the formal transfer of ownership on an account, deed, or title from an individual’s name into the name of the trust. Proper retitling ensures that assets are clearly identified as trust property and helps avoid the need for court intervention after the trustmaker’s death. When retitling does not occur, a Heggstad petition may be necessary to establish ownership. Retitling documents may include deeds, account change forms, beneficiary designation updates, and other records that reflect a deliberate effort to place assets under the trust’s control.
The grantor, sometimes called the trustmaker, is the person who creates the trust and transfers assets into it. The trust document sets out the grantor’s intent regarding how those assets should be managed and distributed. If assets remain in the grantor’s name rather than being retitled into the trust, a Heggstad petition may be used after the grantor’s death to show that the grantor intended those assets to be part of the trust. Demonstrating the grantor’s intent is often central to a court’s decision on a petition.
Probate is the court-supervised process used to administer a decedent’s estate when property is not controlled by a trust or other nonprobate mechanism. The probate process involves validating wills, appointing personal representatives, paying debts, and distributing assets under court oversight. One reason families pursue a Heggstad petition is to avoid probate for property that the grantor intended to belong to a trust. If the court recognizes those assets as trust property, they can typically be administered under the trust terms instead of through probate, which can save time and expenses.
When assets are improperly titled after a trustmaker’s death, families face options such as opening a probate estate, pursuing a Heggstad petition, or using alternative remedies like transfer-on-death designations when available. Probate can be lengthier and more public, while a Heggstad petition seeks a declaratory judgment that certain property belongs to the trust. The choice depends on the specific facts, including the type of asset, available documentation, and whether there is likely to be opposition from heirs. A Heggstad petition often provides a focused judicial determination that aligns assets with the trust without full probate administration.
A limited petition can be appropriate when the assets at issue are modest in value or when documentary evidence clearly links the property to the trust. In such cases, the tribunal may be willing to issue an order with minimal proceedings if the trust instrument and account records support the requested relief. Pursuing a narrowly tailored Heggstad petition can reduce costs and accelerate administration when the legal question is straightforward and uncontested by other parties. Trustees should assemble clear documentation and explain why a focused judicial declaration will resolve the matter efficiently.
When family members and beneficiaries generally agree about the trustmaker’s intent and there is little dispute about ownership, a limited petition may be all that is required to document the trust’s claim. Consent from key parties or the absence of interested-person objections can streamline the court’s review and reduce the need for contested hearings. Trustees should still provide a clear factual record showing intent to include the assets in the trust, but the collaborative nature of the case can make a focused petition an efficient path to resolve title issues and continue trust administration.
A more comprehensive legal approach is advisable when assets involve complicated title issues, numerous accounts, or interests across different financial institutions or jurisdictions. In these situations, mapping asset ownership, coordinating with banks and county recorders, and preparing robust evidentiary support can be necessary to present a persuasive petition. Complex matters may require multiple filings, coordinated discovery, and careful strategy to protect the trust’s interests while addressing objections from third parties or heirs who may contest the petition.
When beneficiaries dispute ownership or there is a realistic risk of litigation over the asset’s disposition, a comprehensive approach helps anticipate and respond to objections. This includes preparing more extensive declarations, retaining necessary records, and possibly engaging financial or forensic assistance to trace transfers and confirm intent. A thorough legal strategy can reduce the risk of prolonged court battles, facilitate negotiated resolutions where possible, and ensure the trustee meets court obligations while advocating for an outcome consistent with the trust’s terms and the decedent’s wishes.
A comprehensive petition strategy helps ensure that the court receives a complete and organized presentation of the facts, reducing the likelihood of follow-up proceedings or unresolved claims. By assembling thorough documentary evidence, identifying interested parties, and addressing potential objections in advance, trustees can improve the chance of a clear judicial determination that supports proper trust administration. This approach also helps preserve family relationships by reducing surprises and demonstrating transparency in the trustee’s handling of disputed assets.
Taking a detailed approach can also minimize delays in the distribution of trust assets and lower overall expenses by avoiding repeated filings or extended discovery phases. When the record presented to the court is well-supported, orders are typically clearer and more durable against future challenges. A comprehensive strategy that anticipates legal and factual hurdles provides trustees and beneficiaries greater certainty and helps ensure that the trustmaker’s intent is respected throughout the administration process.
One of the main benefits of a comprehensive petition is obtaining a court order that explicitly recognizes property as trust assets, removing ambiguity about title and control. Such recognition enables trustees to manage, sell, or distribute property according to the trust terms without having to open a probate estate. Clear judicial recognition also reduces the risk of competing claims from heirs or creditors and provides a solid foundation for completing trust administration with confidence and finality for all involved parties.
A thorough petition process that compiles strong documentary support and addresses potential objections proactively reduces the chance of future litigation over the same assets. Courts favor organized records and clear factual narratives, and when a petition anticipates likely challenges, it can lead to orders that are less vulnerable to successful appeals or new challenges. This stability benefits trustees and beneficiaries by allowing distributions and estate matters to conclude with less uncertainty and by promoting smoother relationships among family members during a difficult time.
Start collecting the trust instrument, account statements, deeds, transfer confirmations, beneficiary forms, and any written communications that show the trustmaker’s intent. Early collection helps preserve records and prevents delays caused by institutions that may archive older documents. Organizing documents chronologically and creating a concise timeline of events can be particularly persuasive to the court. Clear, organized documentation reduces the likelihood of contested hearings and helps the trustee present a straightforward case that supports recognition of the asset as trust property.
Along with documentary evidence, prepare a succinct narrative that explains how and why the asset should be treated as trust property. Create an exhibit list that labels each document and highlights key pages or entries supporting the claim. A logical presentation helps the judge and any opposing parties understand the facts without wading through extraneous materials. A focused narrative paired with labeled exhibits often leads to a more efficient hearing and a clearer judicial determination.
Families may consider a Heggstad petition when assets intended for a trust remain titled in the decedent’s name, causing administrative uncertainty and potential disputes. The petition provides a judicial mechanism to align actual asset ownership with the trustmaker’s documented wishes, enabling trustees to manage or distribute assets according to the trust instead of through probate. This option is particularly helpful for estates that include real property, bank or investment accounts, or retirement plan interests where retitling was overlooked, and it can save time and expense relative to full probate administration in many cases.
Another reason to pursue a petition is to reduce friction among family members by obtaining a neutral court ruling on ownership questions. A court’s determination can prevent continued disagreement and provide a formal record supporting the trustee’s actions. Pursuing a petition early in the administration process often clarifies rights and responsibilities, helps avoid later challenges, and contributes to a more orderly transfer of assets aligned with the trust’s directives and the decedent’s intent.
Typical situations include when a home deed was never changed to the trust, bank accounts remain in the deceased’s name, or financial institutions did not accept beneficiary or transfer documentation before the trustmaker’s death. Other scenarios involve discrepancies between intended planning documents and actual account titling, or when transfers were initiated but not completed. When these circumstances prevent trustees from accessing or distributing assets according to the trust, a Heggstad petition is often the method to secure court recognition of the trust’s interest and move forward with administration.
Real property that was intended to be held in the trust but remains recorded in the grantor’s name commonly triggers a Heggstad petition. Deeds may not have been prepared or recorded before the grantor’s death, or a transfer may have been delayed. When title records do not match the grantor’s plan, the trustee may seek a court declaration that the property belongs to the trust. This remedy clarifies the trustee’s authority to manage, refinance, or sell the property as required by the trust’s terms.
Accounts at banks or brokerage firms sometimes remain under the decedent’s name due to oversight or institutional requirements. When beneficiary designations or transfer-on-death arrangements are absent and the account was meant to be part of the trust, a Heggstad petition can establish the trust’s interest. Trustees typically gather statements, transfer forms, and correspondence demonstrating intent to include those accounts in the trust, then present that evidence to the court to obtain an order allowing trust administration to proceed.
Administrative mistakes, incomplete paperwork, or delays in processing transfers can leave assets improperly titled. Even when the trustmaker clearly intended to fund the trust, these gaps create legal ambiguity after death. In such cases, a Heggstad petition allows the court to examine the circumstances and issue a determination that aligns title with intent. Addressing such administrative issues through the petition process helps prevent later disputes and supports efficient completion of trust administration.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides assistance with trust administration matters in Oxnard and throughout Ventura County, including preparation and prosecution of Heggstad petitions. We help trustees gather necessary records, draft the petition and supporting declarations, serve interested parties, and present the case to the court. Our work focuses on helping clients obtain a clear judicial declaration of ownership when assets were intended to fund a trust but were not retitled. Contact the office to discuss the documents you have and next steps to protect the trust and complete administration.
Clients choose the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for careful, practical guidance through trust administration issues like Heggstad petitions. The firm prioritizes clear communication with trustees and beneficiaries, a methodical approach to assembling supporting evidence, and a focus on resolving title questions efficiently. We explain the process, potential timelines, and relevant costs so clients can make informed decisions about whether a petition is the right path for their situation in Oxnard or Ventura County.
Our approach includes a thorough review of the trust document and asset records, coordination with financial institutions and county recorders as needed, and preparation of well-organized court filings. We strive to reduce administrative delay and to present a cohesive narrative supported by documentary exhibits. By anticipating common procedural and evidentiary issues, we work to obtain clear court recognition of trust ownership and enable trustees to carry out their duties under the trust’s terms with confidence.
We also emphasize transparency with interested persons and attempt to facilitate communication among family members to limit contentious proceedings when possible. When disputes arise, we provide measured representation focused on achieving an outcome consistent with the trustmaker’s intent and governing law. For families in Oxnard facing title uncertainty, a well-prepared petition often clears the path for timely and orderly trust administration.
Our process begins with an initial review of the trust instrument and any available asset records to identify gaps in title. We then work with the trustee to collect supporting documents, draft the petition and declarations, and prepare an exhibit list that clearly ties assets to the trustmaker’s intent. After filing and serving interested parties, we monitor responses and, if necessary, present the matter at a hearing. Throughout, we keep trustees informed about procedural steps, timelines, and likely outcomes so they can make decisions with clear expectations.
Collecting and organizing documentation is the first essential step in preparing a Heggstad petition. This includes obtaining the trust instrument, account statements, deeds, correspondence, and any records of attempted transfers. A clear timeline of events and labeled exhibits improve the petition’s clarity. We also identify interested parties who must be served and confirm filing requirements in Ventura County court. Early attention to detail helps avoid procedural problems and positions the petition for a focused judicial review.
Begin by locating the trust document and related amendments, as well as records that show the assets in question. Account statements, deed histories, beneficiary designation forms, and correspondence with financial institutions are often critical. We assist clients in requesting archived statements or recorded documents as needed and in creating a clear exhibit packet. A well-documented record is essential to demonstrate the trustmaker’s intent and to address inquiries from the court or opposing parties.
Drafting the verified petition and supporting declarations requires a concise presentation of facts and evidence that connect the assets to the trust. Declarations from the trustee and other witnesses, combined with labeled exhibits, form the factual backbone of the petition. We aim to present a persuasive, factual narrative that anticipates common questions and establishes the reason for judicial recognition of the trust’s interest. Attention to procedural form and evidentiary clarity helps courts resolve title questions efficiently.
After filings are prepared, the petition must be filed with the probate court and served on all interested parties according to California rules. Proper notice is essential to give beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested persons the opportunity to respond. We coordinate service, prepare proof of service documents, and handle related procedural filings. Timely and correct notice often shortens the path to resolution by addressing potential objections or securing consent where parties agree the asset should be treated as trust property.
Serving the petition on interested persons and submitting proof of service to the court are mandatory steps. We identify the interested parties, arrange for proper service, and document those efforts with declarations and filings. Ensuring that all notice requirements are met avoids procedural delays and protects the validity of any resulting court order. Accurate and careful handling of service responsibilities is a key part of building a record that the court will accept.
If responses or objections are filed, we analyze the issues raised and attempt to resolve disputes through dialogue or negotiation where possible. When resolution cannot be achieved informally, we prepare responsive pleadings and gather any additional evidence needed for the hearing. Seeking to narrow contested issues early can reduce court time and expense. Throughout this phase, clear communication with clients about strategy and likely outcomes is a priority.
If the matter proceeds to a hearing, we present the documentary record and witness declarations to support the petition, explaining the factual basis for treating the asset as trust property. The court will review the evidence and apply the legal standard to decide whether the property should be recognized as part of the trust. A favorable order can then be used to complete trust administration. If the court requires further proof, the record will guide follow-up proceedings until the issue is resolved.
At the hearing, the petitioner presents the organized exhibit packet and the declarations supporting the trustmaker’s intent. Key documents are highlighted to show why the asset belongs to the trust, and witness statements may corroborate the facts. Clear, concise presentation and a logical exhibit sequence help the court understand the basis for relief. The judge’s ruling will reflect whether the evidence meets the standard to treat the property as trust property rather than subject to probate administration.
Once the court issues an order recognizing the asset as trust property, the trustee uses that order to update title records, transfer titles, or otherwise manage the property under the trust terms. The order provides the legal authority needed to proceed with distributions or asset management and helps prevent future disputes over the same asset. Properly recorded court orders and updated records ensure the trust administration can be completed in a manner consistent with the trustmaker’s wishes.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing that requests a judicial declaration that certain property should be treated as part of a trust even though it remains titled in the name of the decedent or transferor. This remedy is typically used when the grantor intended the property to fund the trust but formal retitling was not completed before death. The petition asks the court to examine the trust instrument and related records to determine whether the asset was effectively intended to be governed by the trust, which can then allow the trustee to administer or distribute the asset under the trust’s terms. Courts consider a range of evidence when deciding a petition, including the trust document, account statements, deeds, transfer paperwork, and written communications showing intent. The process involves filing a verified petition, serving interested persons, and, if necessary, presenting the evidence at a hearing. When the court grants the petition, it issues an order that clarifies ownership and authorizes the trustee to act, which often helps avoid full probate for that asset and reduces administrative uncertainty.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies depending on the complexity of the facts, the completeness of documentation, and whether interested persons contest the petition. In uncontested cases with clear records, the process from filing to court order may move relatively quickly, subject to the probate court’s schedule. When there are disputes, additional time may be needed for responses, potential discovery, and a contested hearing, which extends the timeline. Local court calendars and procedural requirements in Ventura County can also affect how long the matter takes to resolve. Preparing a thorough petition and serving all interested parties correctly helps reduce procedural delays. Engaging with beneficiaries early to seek consent or to address concerns can also shorten the timeline. If objections arise, the case may require more extensive briefing and evidentiary presentations, and the court may continue the matter to allow for additional proof. Clear communication and organized documentation are the two primary factors that can help expedite the process.
Courts look for contemporaneous documentary evidence that demonstrates the grantor’s intent to place an asset in the trust. Strong evidence includes the trust instrument itself, account statements showing the grantor’s intent to fund the trust, deeds or transfer documents, beneficiary designation forms, and correspondence with financial institutions referencing the trust. Statements and declarations from individuals with direct knowledge of the grantor’s intent can supplement documentary proof, but courts give particular weight to written records and formal documents that link the asset to the trust. Organizing exhibits and creating a clear timeline that ties documents to key dates is particularly persuasive. Showing attempts to retitle assets before the grantor’s death, receipts, or institutional forms indicating the grantor’s intent can strengthen the petition. The more direct and contemporaneous the documentation, the more likely the court will find that the asset should be treated as trust property and issue an order recognizing that interest.
Yes, beneficiaries and other interested persons can oppose a Heggstad petition by filing objections or responsive pleadings. When opposition arises, the court may require additional evidence and hold a contested hearing where each side can present declarations, documents, and argument. The presence of objections changes the strategy, often requiring more detailed factual development and possible discovery to resolve disputed issues about the grantor’s intent or the nature of the transfer. A contested matter can extend the timeline and increase costs compared to an uncontested petition. When objections are filed, we aim to address them through negotiation and evidence if possible, seeking to narrow issues and avoid protracted litigation. If resolution is not possible, the court will evaluate the evidence presented and issue a ruling. A careful pre-filing investigation and clear presentation of the factual record can reduce the likelihood or scope of opposition by making the basis for the petition more evident to interested parties.
Alternatives to a Heggstad petition may include pursuing probate administration for assets that cannot be handled under the trust, using transfer-on-death mechanisms if available and properly executed, or negotiating agreements among beneficiaries to voluntarily retitle assets or accept distributions. The right course depends on the asset type, the wishes of the parties involved, and whether there are immediate needs for access to the property. In some cases, executed beneficiary designations or joint accounts may allow transfer without court intervention, but these options depend on prior planning and existing account structures. When alternatives are not feasible or when title issues create legal ambiguity, a Heggstad petition provides a focused judicial remedy. Evaluating the cost and timeline of each option and considering family dynamics helps trustees decide whether a petition is the most efficient path. We help clients assess available alternatives and the likely implications for trust administration and distribution to beneficiaries.
A successful Heggstad petition can prevent the need for probate for the specific assets at issue by establishing that they belong to the trust and thus fall under trust administration rather than probate procedures. However, a petition addresses title for particular property and does not necessarily eliminate probate for other assets that are not governed by the trust. The prospect of avoiding probate depends on the overall structure of the estate and what assets were left outside the trust or otherwise subject to probate administration. It is important to review all estate assets and existing planning documents to determine which items fall within the trust and which may require probate. A Heggstad petition can be an effective tool to limit probate involvement for assets the grantor intended to include in the trust, but a comprehensive review may still be necessary to identify any additional items that need separate handling under probate rules.
Costs associated with a Heggstad petition vary based on complexity, whether the matter is contested, and local court fees. Expenses can include court filing fees, service of process, potential costs to obtain archived records, and legal fees for drafting filings, preparing exhibits, and representing the trustee at hearings. When a case is uncontested and documentation is straightforward, costs tend to be lower, while contested matters with multiple filings and hearings naturally increase legal and procedural expenses. Estimating costs early helps trustees budget for the process. We discuss anticipated fees and costs during an initial consultation and provide information on typical ranges based on similar matters. Transparent communication about potential expenses and an effort to streamline filings and resolve issues where possible are part of our approach to help manage costs while seeking a prompt and effective resolution for the trustee and beneficiaries.
For an initial consultation regarding a possible Heggstad petition, bring the trust document and any amendments, copies of deeds, account statements, beneficiary designation forms, correspondence with financial institutions, and any records of attempted transfers. Even partial records can be helpful to begin assessing the situation. A list of potential interested parties and basic background on how assets were held and managed also assists in evaluating whether a petition is likely to succeed and what additional documents may be needed from banks or recorders. If original documents are unavailable, bring information about where records might be located, account numbers, and contact information for institutions involved. During the consultation, we will explain next steps for obtaining records, preparing filings, and serving interested parties. This preparatory work lays the foundation for a focused petition and clearer guidance about timelines and likely outcomes for trust administration.
Retirement accounts and life insurance policies are often governed by beneficiary designations and contract terms, which sometimes supersede trust planning unless the account owner named the trust as beneficiary. A Heggstad petition is typically aimed at assets that were intended to be retitled or transferred into the trust but were not. If retirement accounts or life insurance naming conventions create ambiguity, other remedial steps or court proceedings may be appropriate depending on the facts. Reviewing beneficiary forms and account contracts is a necessary step to determine the correct course. For retirement accounts and life insurance where the trust was intended as recipient but the forms were not updated, courts may consider the relationship between the documents and the trustmaker’s intent. Each situation depends on the contract language and the available evidence. We help review the account agreements and beneficiary designations to determine whether a petition or another legal remedy is more suitable to align the asset with the trustmaker’s wishes.
A trustee shows the grantor intended an asset to be in the trust by producing documentary and testimonial evidence linking the asset to the trustmaker’s planning. This can include the trust document, account statements reflecting transfers or instructions to fund the trust, deeds, correspondence with financial institutions, and witness declarations describing the grantor’s expressed intent. Demonstrating contemporaneous actions or communications that indicate the trustmaker’s plan to fund the trust is particularly persuasive to the court in evaluating a petition. Creating a clear timeline that ties actions and documents to central planning goals helps the court evaluate intent. Where attempts to retitle assets were made but not completed, records of those attempts are highly valuable. The goal is to present a coherent narrative supported by primary documents that shows the grantor’s plan to have the assets governed by the trust and the reasons transfers were not finalized before the grantor’s passing.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas