A Heggstad petition can be a vital step for trustees and beneficiaries when property titled in the name of a deceased person has not been properly transferred into a trust. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we help clients in Monument Hills and across Yolo County understand how a Heggstad petition can clear title to real property by asking the court to recognize that property should have been transferred to a trust at the decedent’s death. This page explains the petition process, common scenarios that call for filing, and what to expect when pursuing this remedy in California courts.
Many families only discover title problems when they try to refinance, sell, or administer trust assets after a death. A Heggstad petition can provide a formal judicial acknowledgment that a deed was intended to transfer property to a trust but was never completed, or that property was held in a decedent’s name for trust administration purposes. Understanding the legal standards, evidence typically required, and the potential timeline helps trustees and heirs take informed steps to resolve title issues and move forward with estate administration with confidence.
A successful Heggstad petition can remove significant obstacles in trust administration by establishing ownership of property in accordance with the trust creator’s intent. This judicial recognition simplifies transactions such as sale, refinancing, and transfer of real property, and reduces the risk of future title disputes. It also helps trustees meet fiduciary duties by ensuring trust assets are correctly titled for distribution. Filing such a petition can protect beneficiaries’ interests and provide clarity for county recorder offices and title companies, making subsequent legal and financial steps smoother for all parties involved.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman offers comprehensive estate planning and trust administration services from our San Jose roots to clients across California. Our team guides trustees and families through trust administration challenges, including Heggstad petitions, trust modifications, and related filings such as certification of trust and pour-over wills. We place a premium on clear communication, timely action, and practical legal strategies so clients understand options and consequences. If title issues arise after a trustmaker’s death, we collaborate with clients and local professionals to prepare documentation and pursue the appropriate judicial remedies.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to find that real property should be treated as trust property despite the absence of a recorded deed transferring title. The petition typically requires documentary and testimonial evidence showing the decedent’s intent and steps taken to transfer the property to the trust. Courts examine declarations, trust documents, any draft or unrecorded deeds, and communications that demonstrate the intent to place property in trust. Proper preparation and a clear presentation of facts improve the likelihood the court will grant the requested order to quiet title in favor of the trust.
The outcome of a Heggstad petition can affect heirs, trustees, and third parties such as lenders and title insurers, making careful planning and accurate pleadings essential. The petition may resolve disputes or prevent future litigation by putting a formal record in place that clarifies ownership. Trustees must still comply with duties to beneficiaries and provide required notices during the probate or trust administration process. Working with counsel familiar with local court procedures and title practices helps ensure that filings are complete and persuasive to the court and to stakeholders who rely on recorded documents.
A Heggstad petition seeks a judicial declaration that property should be treated as if it had been properly conveyed to a trust, even though a deed was not recorded. The petition explains the factual basis for the request, such as the existence of a trust, the decedent’s intent to fund the trust, and actions taken that demonstrate that intent. It asks the court to order the county recorder to accept a certified copy of the trust or enter an order that clarifies title, enabling the trustee to manage or transfer the asset according to the trust. The petition is a focused mechanism to align recorded title with estate planning documents and intent.
Courts reviewing Heggstad petitions consider a combination of documentary evidence and credible declarations that show the trustmaker intended the property to belong to the trust at death. Relevant items include the trust instrument, any draft or unrecorded deed language, correspondence with attorneys or real estate professionals, and affidavits from the trustee or witnesses familiar with the trustmaker’s intentions. The court also examines whether the trustee followed required procedures for notice and administration. Careful assembly of these materials and clear legal argumentation help the court understand why an order is warranted to quiet title in favor of the trust.
Understanding common terms used in Heggstad petitions and trust administration can clarify the process. This glossary highlights definitions and will help you follow pleadings, court orders, and communications with title companies. Knowing what phrases like ‘quiet title,’ ‘trustee,’ and ‘recording’ mean in the context of a trust dispute or title issue prepares trustees and beneficiaries to gather the appropriate documentation and respond to legal requirements. Clear definitions also help clients communicate effectively with counsel and local agencies when title problems surface.
Quiet title is a court process that resolves competing claims to ownership of real property and clears the public record of clouds on title. In the context of a Heggstad petition, a quiet title component asks the court to declare that property is trust property and that no other party holds superior title. The resulting court order can be recorded with the county recorder to establish a clear chain of title, allowing trustees to sell, refinance, or transfer property without uncertainty about ownership. This reduces barriers to transactions that depend on clear recorded title.
A trustee is a person or entity responsible for managing trust assets in accordance with the trust document and applicable law. When filing a Heggstad petition, the trustee typically initiates the process to confirm that certain property belongs to the trust and to obtain court approval or orders needed to correct the public record. Trustees have fiduciary duties to act in beneficiaries’ best interests and must provide any required notices or accountings during administration. Trustees may need legal assistance to compile evidence and present the petition effectively to the court.
A beneficiary is an individual or organization entitled to receive benefits from a trust under its terms. Beneficiaries have an interest in ensuring trust assets are properly administered and titled so distributions can be made as intended. A Heggstad petition can protect beneficiaries by clarifying ownership and enabling the trustee to use, manage, or transfer trust property consistent with the trustmaker’s wishes. Beneficiaries are often involved in the administration process and may receive notice of petitions or filings that affect trust assets and their future distributions.
Recording is the process of filing legal documents with the county recorder to put the public on notice of ownership or encumbrances affecting real property. With a Heggstad petition, the court’s order or a certified trust instrument may be recorded to reflect the trust’s interest in the property. The county recorder maintains public land records used by title companies, lenders, and potential buyers to verify ownership. When title issues arise because a deed was not recorded, the recorder’s office often plays a role after the court issues an order clarifying ownership so the official record aligns with the legal determination.
When property that should belong to a trust remains titled in a decedent’s name, trustees and families may consider several paths: filing a Heggstad petition, initiating a probate action, negotiating with title companies for alternative solutions, or pursuing a quiet title lawsuit. The best option depends on facts such as whether the trust document and supporting evidence clearly show intent, whether beneficiaries agree, and whether third parties like lenders are involved. A Heggstad petition can be more streamlined than full probate in many situations, but each route has legal and practical implications to weigh carefully with counsel.
A less intensive approach may succeed when documents and parties present a straightforward scenario: the trust instrument clearly identifies the property, unrecorded deeds or communications demonstrate the trustmaker’s intention, and beneficiaries and relevant third parties do not dispute ownership. In such cases, the trustee might obtain a title company’s acceptance of alternative documentation or record a certification of trust that satisfies the county recorder. Avoiding court proceedings can reduce cost and delay, but the trustee should be prepared to show strong supporting evidence should any question arise.
When title companies, lenders, or other stakeholders are willing to accept substituted documentation, a straightforward administrative solution can often clear title without filing a Heggstad petition. This can occur when the trustmaker’s paperwork and declarations are persuasive and all interested parties consent to the proposed recording. Even when cooperation is possible, trustees should confirm that the accepted documentation will be sufficient for future transactions and that the county recorder will accept the filing. Legal counsel can negotiate with title professionals and prepare documents that satisfy both legal and transactional requirements.
Comprehensive legal action, including filing a Heggstad petition, may be necessary when beneficiaries dispute ownership or when documentary evidence is ambiguous. In contested situations, a court’s authoritative determination can resolve competing claims and establish a clear public record. Litigation provides procedures for discovery, evidentiary hearings, and final orders that have legal force against subsequent challenges. Trustees facing disagreement or incomplete evidence will often pursue a judicial route to ensure title is conclusively clarified and to minimize the risk of future claims.
When title issues involve encumbrances, lender interests, or multiple parties with competing claims, filing a petition with the court typically creates the clarity needed for lenders and title insurers to proceed. Courts can order solutions that address liens, subordinate claims, or other complications that prevent normal transactions. Handling these complexities through a formal proceeding reduces uncertainty for prospective buyers and financial institutions and provides the legal documentation necessary to complete sales, refinancing, or transfers in accordance with the trust instrument and court directives.
A judicial approach through a Heggstad petition often offers long-term certainty by producing a court order that can be recorded to clear the public record. This solution reduces the likelihood of future disputes over ownership and allows trustees to carry out property transactions with confidence. The process provides procedural protections for all interested parties and creates a formal path to address claims and objections. For trustees managing significant trust assets, the stability afforded by a court determination can outweigh the additional time or expense compared with purely administrative routes.
In addition to establishing clear title, a court order can facilitate cooperation with title companies and lenders, allowing sales and refinances to proceed without lingering questions. The recorded order serves as persuasive public documentation that aligns recorded ownership with the trustmaker’s intent, streamlining future transactions and reducing administrative burdens for trustees and beneficiaries. For circumstances involving contested claims or complex title histories, judicial resolution brings structure and finality that supports the trust administration process and protects beneficiaries’ interests.
A principal advantage of pursuing a Heggstad petition is finality: a judge’s order provides authoritative confirmation of ownership that can be recorded to correct the chain of title. This record clarity is especially valuable when third parties depend on public documents for lending and title insurance decisions. With clear, recorded documentation, trustees can liquidate or transfer trust assets with reduced risk of future claims. This long-term certainty supports efficient estate administration and can prevent future disputes that might otherwise arise from uncertain or defective title.
Judicial resolution protects both trustees and beneficiaries by establishing a formal legal basis for actions taken with trust property. When a court recognizes that property belongs to a trust, trustees have clearer authority to manage, sell, or distribute the asset in accordance with the trust’s terms. Beneficiaries benefit from reduced risk of surprise claims or title defects that could affect distributions. Overall, the courtroom route can provide the documentation and authority necessary to proceed with confidence when administering or disposing of trust assets.
Begin by collecting the trust instrument, any draft or unrecorded deeds, correspondence with your estate planner, and documents showing payment of property-related expenses. Clear documentary evidence of the trustmaker’s intent and actions toward transferring property to the trust strengthens the case for a Heggstad petition. Also gather county recorder records, mortgage statements, and tax assessments that identify the property. Having thorough documentation organized and ready will help streamline discussions with counsel and make it easier to prepare declarations, exhibits, and supporting statements that a court will consider when resolving title issues.
Anticipate that title companies and lenders will require documentation before completing transactions involving real property. After obtaining a court order or a suitable recorded document, present certified copies to title professionals and lenders to obtain clearances for sale or refinance. If the title company raises concerns about defects or gaps in the record, address them proactively by preparing supplemental declarations or seeking additional orders. Early coordination with title professionals helps identify potential roadblocks and ensures that court orders will be sufficient to satisfy transactional requirements.
You should consider a Heggstad petition when the property intended for a trust remains titled in a deceased person’s name and that title issue creates obstacles to administration, sale, or refinancing. The petition provides a legal pathway to align recorded ownership with the trustmaker’s intent and enables trustees to carry out their duties. If beneficiaries face uncertainty, third parties refuse to recognize trust ownership, or potential title clouds could impair transactions, filing a petition can deliver the clarity and legal authority needed to resolve these matters efficiently and reduce future disputes.
Another reason to pursue this remedy is to protect the integrity of estate planning goals and ensure distributions occur as intended. When real property is not properly transferred, assets may be left in limbo and beneficiaries may experience delays. Seeking a court determination creates a formal record supporting the trustee’s actions and allows transactions to proceed without unresolved title questions. Trustees and families often choose this option to provide permanent assurance about ownership so that future buyers, lenders, and beneficiaries can rely on the public record.
Typical scenarios that lead to Heggstad petitions include situations where an intended deed to a trust was never recorded, property remained in the decedent’s individual name at death, or a trustmaker believed transfer had been completed but evidence is incomplete. Other circumstances involve assets discovered during administration that were overlooked or documentation showing intent but lacking formal recording. When title problems appear during sales, refinances, or distribution planning, trustees often turn to a Heggstad petition to create a clear judicial record aligning title with the trust document and trustmaker’s intent.
When a deed intended to convey property to a trust was prepared but never recorded, or when a deed contains language indicating trust funding but was not finalized, a Heggstad petition can ask the court to recognize the transfer as effective for trust purposes. Gathering supporting evidence such as drafts, correspondence with counsel or escrow, and declarations from those with knowledge of the trustmaker’s intent will bolster the petition. The court’s order can then be recorded to establish the trust’s ownership and clear the chain of title for future transactions.
If property remained titled in the decedent’s name at the time of death despite the presence of a trust, trustees may need the court’s assistance to confirm that the property was always intended for the trust. Evidence of intent and steps toward funding the trust are central to the petition. A court finding that the property belongs to the trust allows the trustee to manage or distribute the asset under the trust’s terms, rather than subjecting it to probate administration, which can be more time-consuming and public.
Title issues commonly surface when a trustee attempts to sell or refinance property and the title company or lender identifies defects or inconsistencies in the record. A Heggstad petition can resolve these problems by producing a court order that title professionals accept to clear the public record. Preparing thorough documentation and working with counsel to address any lender or insurer concerns will help expedite transactions and ensure that the trustee can proceed with the sale or refinance once the court provides the necessary determination.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides legal support to trustees and families in Monument Hills and throughout Yolo County who face title issues after a trustmaker’s death. We help evaluate whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate, assemble required documents, prepare declarations, and represent clients in court hearings when needed. Our approach emphasizes clear communication and practical solutions aimed at resolving title problems efficiently. If you encounter difficulty with property title or need to ensure trust assets are properly titled, reach out to discuss options for moving forward with confidence.
Clients turn to our firm for attentive legal guidance through trust administration matters and title clarification procedures. We focus on understanding the facts, identifying the most effective legal path, and preparing persuasive filings that present the trustmaker’s intent and relevant evidence. Whether the matter is straightforward or contested, our team works to minimize delay and reduce transactional obstacles that arise from unclear title. We stress thorough preparation of documentation to help courts and title professionals reach sound determinations that support trustee actions.
Our representation includes managing communications with beneficiaries, title companies, and lenders to coordinate the steps needed to record court orders or supportive documents. We assist trustees in fulfilling notice and administration obligations while seeking the remedies that bring clarity to the public record. From drafting the petition to obtaining and recording orders, we help clients navigate procedural requirements and address questions that arise during the process. This comprehensive support gives trustees and families a clear path to resolving title issues tied to trust property.
We also provide guidance on related estate planning documents that can prevent similar problems in the future, including revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, certifications of trust, and powers of attorney. By reviewing existing estate plans and suggesting practical recording practices, we help clients reduce the risk that important assets will remain titled incorrectly. Taking preventative steps and addressing current title issues can preserve the value of trust assets and help ensure distributions occur smoothly according to the trust’s terms.
Our process begins with a thorough review of the trust documents and property records to determine whether a Heggstad petition or alternate solution is most appropriate. We gather necessary evidence, prepare declarations from trustees and witnesses, coordinate with title agents, and file the petition with the probate court when warranted. During the proceeding, we respond to inquiries from interested parties, present supporting documentation, and seek an order that can be recorded to correct title. Our goal is to provide a clear, documented path that allows trustees to manage and transfer trust assets effectively.
The first step focuses on evaluating the facts and assembling the evidence needed to support a petition. We review the trust, any deeds, correspondence, and county records, and identify witnesses who can attest to the trustmaker’s intent. Gathering thorough documentation at the outset increases the chance of a favorable outcome and may reveal alternative administrative solutions if appropriate. A careful assessment helps set realistic expectations about timing, potential challenges, and what the court will require to reach a decision in the trustee’s favor.
We examine the trust instrument, deed drafts, prior recordings, and any documents showing payment of property expenses to build a coherent narrative supporting the transfer to the trust. Identifying inconsistencies in recorded documents and compiling a clear title history allows us to present targeted arguments and exhibits to the court. This step also involves checking county recorder records and confirming whether prior instruments exist that might affect the petition. Accurate and comprehensive documentation supports a persuasive filing and helps identify potential obstacles early.
We prepare affidavits or declarations from trustees, family members, attorneys, or others who can attest to the trustmaker’s intent and the circumstances surrounding the unrecorded transfer. These firsthand statements provide context and corroborate documentary evidence. Clear, well-drafted declarations describing conversations, steps taken to fund the trust, and other relevant facts help the court understand why the order requested is appropriate. Gathering this supportive testimony early ensures the petition includes the necessary factual foundation.
After preparing the petition and exhibits, we file the Heggstad petition with the appropriate probate court and ensure required notices are sent to interested parties. Proper service and notice are critical to the court process so that beneficiaries and other stakeholders have an opportunity to respond. We coordinate filings with court clerks to meet local rules and timelines. If potential objections exist, we prepare for those contingencies by gathering additional evidence and shaping legal arguments that address anticipated challenges effectively.
The petition is drafted to explain the legal basis for requesting a court order that aligns recorded title with the trustmaker’s intent. We include key exhibits such as the trust instrument, any unrecorded deed drafts, and supporting declarations that demonstrate the facts. Clear organization of exhibits and a persuasive statement of facts help the court evaluate the petition efficiently. Attention to local court formatting and procedural requirements promotes a smoother filing process and reduces avoidable delays.
Once the petition is filed, we arrange for appropriate notice and service on beneficiaries, potential claimants, and other interested entities as required by law. Proper service ensures that parties who may be affected have an opportunity to be heard and protects the validity of any subsequent court order. We track deadlines and confirmations of service to present the court with proof that notice requirements were satisfied, which is often an essential element for the court to issue a binding order regarding title.
Following filing and notice, the court may set a hearing to consider the petition. We present declarations and documentary evidence and address any objections raised by interested parties. If the court is persuaded, it will issue an order that can be recorded with the county to clarify title. We assist with obtaining certified copies of orders and recording them so the public record reflects the court’s determination. This final step ensures that title companies, lenders, and future purchasers see the corrected ownership in the official records.
At the hearing, the court reviews the submitted evidence and hears argument. We prepare to respond to any objections or questions about intent, documentation, or procedural issues. Presenting a clear evidentiary record and thoughtful legal reasoning helps the court understand why the requested order should be granted. If disputes arise, we work to narrow issues and propose practical resolutions that address concerns while preserving the trustmaker’s intentions and beneficiaries’ interests.
After the court issues an order, we obtain certified copies and file them with the county recorder to establish the corrected chain of title. Proper recordation is essential so that title companies and lenders can rely on the public documents for transactions. We coordinate with local recording offices and follow up with title professionals to confirm that the order has the intended effect on the property record. This recorded order provides long-term assurance that the property is recognized as part of the trust estate.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing that asks a probate court to declare that property should be treated as trust property despite the absence of a recorded deed transferring it into the trust. It is commonly used when the trust instrument and other evidence show that the decedent intended the property to be part of the trust but title remained in the decedent’s name at death. The petition aims to align recorded ownership with the trustmaker’s expressed intent so the trustee can manage, sell, or distribute the asset in accordance with the trust. The petition process involves submitting the trust, supporting documents, and declarations to the court and giving notice to interested parties. If the court is satisfied with the evidence, it issues an order that can be recorded to correct the public record. This judicial route provides formal legal recognition of ownership for third parties such as title companies and lenders, and it helps avoid future disputes about the asset’s proper status as trust property.
Timeline for a Heggstad petition varies depending on factors such as the court’s calendar, whether interested parties contest the petition, and the completeness of the evidence presented. In uncontested situations with straightforward documentation, the process may be completed in a matter of months from filing to order issuance. Complex or contested matters that require additional discovery or hearings can extend the timeline significantly. Local court workloads and notice requirements also influence how quickly a matter proceeds to hearing and resolution. To reduce delays, thorough preparation is essential: organizing trust documents, gathering declarations, and providing timely notice to interested parties before filing can streamline proceedings. Working proactively with title companies and lenders to identify any transactional requirements and submitting clear, well-supported filings helps courts evaluate the petition efficiently and can shorten the overall duration of the matter.
Supportive evidence for a Heggstad petition typically includes the trust instrument itself, any draft or unrecorded deeds referencing the trust, communications between the trustmaker and their attorney or other advisors, and declarations from those with firsthand knowledge of the trustmaker’s intent. Proof of payment for property expenses or mortgage payments can also support the contention that the property was intended to be part of the trust. The goal is to present a coherent factual narrative showing that the trustmaker intended the property to be trust property at death. Well-drafted declarations from trustees, family members, and professionals who handled the estate planning can be especially persuasive. Combined with documentary exhibits and an organized title history from the county recorder, these materials help the court assess whether the order requested is warranted. Preparing this evidence thoroughly in advance increases the likelihood of a favorable ruling and reduces the chance of procedural setbacks during the hearing.
A court order resulting from a Heggstad petition is often accepted by lenders and title companies as authoritative proof that property should be treated as trust property. Once recorded, the order corrects the chain of title and gives third parties the documentation they need to proceed with sales, refinances, or other transactions. Title companies typically review the recorded order and related exhibits to confirm that the public record now reflects the court’s determination, which resolves many of the obstacles that originally prevented normal transactions. However, some lenders or insurers may request additional documentation or conditions before proceeding, particularly if encumbrances or liens are present. In those cases, the trustee may need to work with counsel and the lender to address outstanding issues, potentially including subordinations or payoff arrangements, so that the lender will clear the title for its purposes.
Yes, beneficiaries and other interested parties may contest a Heggstad petition if they believe the property should not be treated as trust property or if they dispute the facts underlying the petition. Because notice is required to interested parties, those individuals have an opportunity to file objections or present counter-evidence. Contested proceedings can involve additional discovery, witness testimony, and legal briefing to resolve factual disputes about intent, documentation, or the circumstances surrounding the purported transfer. When contests arise, the court evaluates the evidence and determines ownership based on applicable legal standards and the preponderance of evidence. Preparing a strong evidentiary record and clear declarations is especially important in contested matters to persuade the court that the property belongs to the trust and that the requested order is appropriate under the circumstances.
A Heggstad petition can in some cases serve as a narrower alternative to a full probate administration because it targets title clarification for particular assets rather than opening a probate estate. When a valid trust exists and the evidence supports treating the property as trust property, a Heggstad petition may avoid the need for probate to transfer that asset. This targeted approach can save time and maintain privacy for trust administration. However, whether probate is avoidable depends on the specific facts, the completeness of documents, and whether third parties accept nonjudicial solutions. If multiple assets require resolution or if other estate administration issues exist, probate might still be necessary for some aspects of the estate. Evaluating each situation on its own facts helps trustees determine whether a Heggstad petition alone will resolve the relevant problems or whether a broader probate process is required to address other liabilities, distributions, or title matters.
Costs for filing a Heggstad petition include court filing fees, service of process expenses, potential title company or recording fees, and attorney fees for preparing the petition, exhibits, and declarations. The total cost can vary substantially based on the case’s complexity, whether the matter is contested, and local court fee structures. Simple uncontested petitions typically incur lower overall costs, while contested matters or those that require extensive discovery and hearings generally result in higher fees due to the additional time and resources required to prepare and litigate the issues. To manage expenses, trustees can focus on early evidence gathering and clear communication with beneficiaries and title professionals to limit disputes. Exploring administrative alternatives with title companies or lenders before filing may also reduce costs. While cost is an important consideration, trustees should weigh the financial investment against the long-term benefits of achieving clear title and avoiding future litigation over trust property.
In some cases a certification of trust or other recorded documents may satisfy a title company and county recorder and eliminate the need for a Heggstad petition. A certification of trust provides certain trust details without revealing the full trust document and can sometimes be recorded to support claims of trust ownership. Where documentation and stakeholder cooperation are sufficient, administrative remedies may clear title. However, certification alone may not be accepted in every instance, especially where recorded deeds contradict the claim or when lenders require a court order for definitive resolution. When certification or other documentation is insufficient, a Heggstad petition provides a judicial determination that carries greater weight for clearing title. Assessing whether certification will suffice involves reviewing the title history, communicating with the title company and lender, and determining whether any interested parties might object. Counsel can help evaluate these options and recommend the most effective path based on the facts at hand.
After a court grants a Heggstad petition, the order is typically recorded with the county recorder so the public records reflect the court’s determination that the property is trust property. The trustee obtains certified copies of the order and submits them for recording, which clears the chain of title and enables transactions such as sale or refinance to proceed. The recorded order becomes part of the official property record and provides tangible proof for title companies, lenders, and future parties relying on the public record. Following recordation, trustees should confirm with title professionals and lenders that the recorded order satisfies their requirements. If necessary, the trustee can coordinate additional steps such as paying off liens or obtaining endorsements from title insurers. The goal is to ensure the recorded order has the intended practical effect of restoring marketable title and enabling the trustee to administer the property according to the trust’s terms.
To prevent similar title issues in the future, ensure that real property intended for a trust is conveyed and recorded promptly during the trustmaker’s lifetime. Recording deeds with clear trust language, maintaining accurate property records, and confirming with the county recorder that transfers are reflected in the public record reduce the risk of assets remaining titled in an individual’s name. Regular reviews of estate planning documents and ownership records after significant life events help catch potential problems early and allow corrective steps before death or transaction timeframes. Other preventative measures include keeping copies of deed drafts, escrow instructions, and correspondence with attorneys or title professionals that document intent to fund the trust. Using a certification of trust where appropriate for recordation and coordinating with title companies and mortgage lenders about transfer requirements can also limit future disputes. Proactive record-keeping and timely filings are effective ways to avoid the need for judicial intervention down the road.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas