A Heggstad petition is a legal filing in California used to confirm that certain assets were intended to be part of a decedent’s trust even though title or beneficiary documentation may not have been updated. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, we help clients near Beale Air Force Base understand when a Heggstad petition can prevent assets from going through probate and ensure the trust administration reflects the decedent’s true intentions. This guide explains the petition’s purpose, typical circumstances when it is used, and how it interacts with common estate planning documents in California.
People often discover after a loved one’s death that property meant for a trust remains titled in the decedent’s name or lacks proper beneficiary designations. A Heggstad petition asks the court to declare that those assets were the decedent’s trust property at the time of death, allowing them to pass under trust terms without formal probate administration. This process is commonly needed for real estate, brokerage accounts, vehicles, or other assets not retitled. The petition helps align the decedent’s intended plan with legal title, reducing delay and expense for beneficiaries.
Filing a Heggstad petition can preserve the intent of the decedent’s estate plan by legally recognizing that specific assets belonged to the trust despite administrative oversights. The key benefits include avoiding full probate for the contested assets, clarifying title issues that block transfers, and enabling trustees to distribute property according to the trust terms. In many cases it saves time and reduces costs for beneficiaries. The petition also provides certainty to third parties such as title companies, banks, and county recorders, allowing assets to be transferred with a clear court determination.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman has served clients throughout San Jose, Yuba County, and communities near Beale Air Force Base with estate planning and trust administration services. Our attorneys focus on practical, client-centered guidance for resolving title issues and trust disputes through litigation and court petitions when necessary. We work closely with trustees, beneficiaries, and family members to collect documentation, assemble declarations and affidavits, and present a clear record that supports a Heggstad petition. Our approach emphasizes communication, thorough preparation, and minimizing conflict while advancing our clients’ goals in court.
A Heggstad petition is a judicial proceeding under California law that asks the probate court to determine whether property should be treated as part of a trust. The petition typically arises when assets were intended to be transferred into a trust but the deed, account title, or beneficiary designation was not updated. The court reviews evidence such as trust documents, transfer forms, checks, deeds, and testimony to determine the decedent’s intent and whether property belonged to the trust at death. This remedy helps trustees obtain clear title and distribute assets without opening probate for the entire estate.
The Heggstad decision created a process to avoid unnecessary probate for assets where legal title does not reflect the decedent’s transfer into a trust. While not all missing transfers qualify, a successful petition shows that the decedent intended the asset to be trust property and took steps, however informal, to effect that result before death. Courts examine the totality of the evidence and will grant relief when equity and the record support inclusion in the trust. The procedure can be faster and more focused than formal probate administration for a limited set of assets.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to declare that particular assets were owned by the decedent’s trust at the time of death despite defects in formal title. This remedy is named after a California case that allowed courts to reform the record to match the settlor’s intent when sufficient evidence exists. The petition does not create new rights but recognizes that the trust already controlled the property. The result is a court order confirming trust ownership, which allows trustees to transfer or manage the asset consistent with the trust terms, avoiding delay and costs associated with probate administration.
Courts consider several important factors when evaluating a Heggstad petition, including the language and date of the trust instrument, any written or recorded transfer documents, deeds, beneficiary designations, and statements or conduct demonstrating the decedent’s intent. Evidence may include canceled checks, bank records, correspondence, witness declarations, and draft documents. Trustees must assemble a clear factual record showing steps taken toward transfer and the decedent’s consistent actions. The process often requires careful factual development, legal argument about equitable remedy and title, and coordination with title companies or custodians.
Understanding common legal terms helps trustees and beneficiaries navigate a Heggstad petition. Familiarity with terms such as trust, trustee, settlor, title, deed, beneficiary designation, probate, and court order clarifies the process. This section defines each term concisely and explains how they relate to a petition to include assets in a trust. Having clear definitions and examples can reduce confusion when gathering documentation and preparing declarations, and it helps non-lawyers understand the role of court findings in transferring contested assets into a trust.
A trust is a legal arrangement where a person transfers property to be managed by a trustee for the benefit of named beneficiaries according to the trust document. In the context of a Heggstad petition, the trust’s language and creation date are reviewed to determine whether the asset at issue was intended to be included. The settlor’s actions and documents showing intent to fund the trust are central. Properly funded trust assets avoid probate, but where title is not changed, a petition seeks court recognition that the asset was nevertheless part of the trust.
A trustee is the individual or institution appointed by the trust document to manage trust assets and carry out the settlor’s instructions. When filing a Heggstad petition, the trustee typically brings the petition to confirm that certain assets are trust property so they can be managed or distributed according to the trust. The trustee must present evidence of the settlor’s intent and any steps taken to transfer the asset, and the trustee owes fiduciary duties to act prudently and in beneficiaries’ best interests throughout the petition and transfer processes.
Probate is the court-supervised process for administering a decedent’s estate when assets are titled in an individual’s name without trust or beneficiary arrangements to pass them outside probate. A Heggstad petition seeks to avoid probate for specific assets by asking the court to declare they were trust property. Successful petitions can remove only the identified assets from probate, allowing the trustee to act under the trust. This can reduce delay and expense that would come from broader probate administration for the estate.
A deed and the title record establish legal ownership of real property. When deeds are not updated to reflect transfer into a trust, title companies may refuse to close or transfer property at death. A Heggstad petition aims to obtain a court order recognizing that the property belonged to the trust despite the recorded title. Supporting evidence might include draft deeds, grantor’s statements, or documents reflecting intent to transfer. Once the court issues an order, title companies and recorders can process transfers consistent with that determination.
When assets are not properly titled to a trust, affected parties may consider multiple paths: filing a Heggstad petition, pursuing a standard probate, or attempting administrative transfers with documentation and agreements among heirs. A Heggstad petition targets specific assets and aims to avoid probate for them, while probate addresses all assets in a decedent’s estate that lack trust-based transfer mechanisms. Parties should weigh costs, timing, the strength of evidence supporting trust ownership, and the level of dispute among beneficiaries. Our firm helps clients evaluate which path aligns best with their goals and the available record.
A limited approach such as a Heggstad petition is often appropriate when there is strong documentary evidence showing the decedent intended the asset to be part of the trust. Documents like draft or executed deeds, canceled checks for purchase or transfer, beneficiary designation forms, or contemporaneous correspondence can demonstrate intent and steps taken. When the factual record is robust and parties largely agree about intent, a focused petition can efficiently resolve title issues without initiating a full probate. This minimizes expense and expedites transfer for the affected asset.
A Heggstad petition works best when disputes among family members or beneficiaries are limited or can be resolved through the court process without broader estate litigation. If parties agree on intent but need a formal court determination to satisfy title companies or custodians, the petition is a targeted remedy. When disagreements are narrow in scope and evidence is persuasive, the petition avoids the broader scope, cost, and delay of probate or other contested proceedings, while providing a binding court order to support transfer and administration under the trust.
A comprehensive legal approach is often needed when multiple assets suffer title problems, beneficiary designations are contested, or there are competing claims that touch many parts of the estate. In such circumstances, resolving a single asset will not fully address the administration challenges. Comprehensive representation can include coordinated litigation, multiple petitions, accountings, and broader estate proceedings. The firm assists clients in assessing whether a narrow petition will suffice or whether a more extensive plan of legal action is required to protect beneficiaries and the trust’s integrity.
When beneficiaries or other parties vigorously contest transfers, or when creditor claims threaten estate assets, a Heggstad petition alone may be insufficient. Complex disputes can require discovery, evidentiary hearings, and strategic filings beyond a single petition. In those situations, full-service representation helps develop legal strategy, coordinate document collection, manage communication among parties, and pursue or defend multiple proceedings as needed. This comprehensive support aims to secure fair outcomes while protecting fiduciary duties and preserving trust property for rightful beneficiaries.
A comprehensive legal approach brings coordinated handling of title issues, beneficiary disputes, and related estate matters. When one action cannot resolve interconnected problems, broad representation ensures consistent strategy across filings and hearings. This can streamline evidence gathering, reduce duplication of effort, and provide clarity to trustees and beneficiaries about next steps. Comprehensive counsel also anticipates potential complications—such as tax implications, creditor claims, or competing property interests—and addresses them proactively to avoid delays and additional costs later in the administration.
Comprehensive representation supports trustees by handling communication with third parties like title companies, banks, and recorders, and coordinating court filings to protect the trust and beneficiaries. It can also reduce stress for family members by providing a single point of contact for all legal matters arising from a decedent’s failure to retitle assets. The ultimate objective is to secure a clear legal path to transfer, manage disputes effectively, and complete administration with accountability and efficiency so beneficiaries receive assets in accordance with the settlor’s intentions.
A comprehensive approach often culminates in court orders that provide finality and clarify ownership, which third parties respect. These orders enable trustees to transfer assets, issue clear instructions to financial institutions, and record deeds with certainty. When the court resolves title or beneficiary disputes, it reduces the likelihood of future litigation. Achieving a definitive ruling through proper proceedings protects the trustee from later claims and reassures beneficiaries that the distribution follows the decedent’s intent, allowing the trust administration to progress to completion without lingering ambiguity.
Comprehensive legal attention helps trustees manage potential risks such as challenges to transfers, creditor assertions, or unclear title issues across multiple assets. By addressing these matters in a coordinated manner, trustees reduce exposure to personal liability and ensure steps taken are well documented and legally sound. Beneficiaries benefit from a consistent strategy that prioritizes preserving trust value, minimizing delays, and ensuring distributions occur under court-sanctioned processes that reflect the settlor’s intentions and applicable California law.
Collecting documentation as early as possible strengthens a Heggstad petition. Relevant items include the trust instrument, deeds, bank and brokerage records, canceled checks, beneficiary forms, correspondence that reflects intent, and any drafts or signed but unrecorded transfer documents. Statements from witnesses who observed the decedent’s actions or intentions can also be important. Having a well-organized file helps the petition process move more quickly, supports persuasive declarations, and reduces the need for extensive discovery or follow-up litigation.
Careful preparation of declarations and supporting evidence is essential for a successful petition. Declarations should chronicle the decedent’s steps to transfer assets, the timing of documents, and any obstacles encountered. Photocopies of drafts, notations on deeds, and transactional records help create a coherent narrative. Where possible, gather sworn statements from individuals who can attest to the decedent’s intent and actions. A well-documented petition reduces the need for protracted hearings and increases the likelihood of a timely court determination.
Consider a Heggstad petition when assets intended for a trust remain titled in the decedent’s name or lack updated beneficiary designations and you want to avoid probate for those assets. It can be particularly valuable when probate would be expensive relative to the asset’s value or when immediate transfer is needed to satisfy mortgage or tax obligations. The petition also serves families where timely transfer is important to maintain continuity of property management or to allow trustees to access funds needed for final expenses or ongoing support of beneficiaries.
Another reason to pursue this remedy is to obtain a clear court order that title companies and financial institutions will accept for recording or transferring assets. Without such an order, institutions may refuse to process transfers or close escrow, leaving beneficiaries in limbo. The petition offers a judicial determination that aligns legal title with the settlor’s intent, which can be especially helpful for real property transactions, retirement account ownership questions, and disputed beneficiary designations. This clarity aids trustees in fulfilling their duties effectively.
Typical scenarios prompting a Heggstad petition include when a deed was prepared but not recorded, a property remains in the decedent’s name despite directions to fund the trust, brokerage or bank accounts were not retitled, or beneficiary designations were overlooked. Military families and individuals who moved frequently can find assets were not updated. Other circumstances include ambiguous language on forms or last-minute changes where paperwork did not reflect the settlor’s final plan. The petition addresses these common administrative gaps to effectuate the trust.
Unrecorded deeds or deeds that were prepared but not completed at the time of death are a frequent cause of Heggstad petitions. When the trust document indicates the property should belong to the trust but the county records show the decedent as owner, title companies often require a court order to proceed. A petition explains the circumstances, presents supporting evidence, and seeks a judicial declaration aligning record title with the trust, enabling trustees to record corrected documents and transfer property according to the settlor’s wishes.
Bank, brokerage, or retirement accounts that were meant to be retitled to the trust but remained in the decedent’s individual name can impede distribution. Financial institutions may refuse to accept trust instructions without a court order. A Heggstad petition documents intent and steps taken, asking the court to affirm the account was trust property. Once granted, the trustee can present the order to custodians to facilitate transfers or distributions, allowing beneficiaries to receive assets under the trust rather than through probate.
Sometimes retirement accounts, life insurance policies, or payable-on-death accounts contain beneficiary designations that do not reflect the settlor’s overall estate plan. If the intention was for these assets to pass to the trust, but designations were not updated, a Heggstad petition can be used to show the decedent intended the trust to receive those proceeds. The petition gathers evidence of intent and seeks a declaration that the trust was the intended recipient, which helps ensure distributions follow the settlor’s broader wishes.
We assist military families and civilian residents near Beale Air Force Base with Heggstad petitions and trust administration. Our office helps collect necessary documents, draft declarations, communicate with financial institutions and title companies, and prepare court filings tailored to county procedures. We understand the unique circumstances facing service members and families who move frequently and may have assets in multiple jurisdictions. Our goal is to provide clear guidance on whether a petition is appropriate and to pursue efficient resolution when trust property needs judicial confirmation.
Clients choose the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman because we focus on practical, court-minded solutions for trust funding and title problems. We approach each petition with careful factual preparation, identify records that demonstrate intent, and present persuasive declarations to the probate court. Our familiarity with California probate procedures and local county practices allows us to anticipate common hurdles and streamline filings. We prioritize clear communication so trustees and beneficiaries understand the process, timeline, and likely outcomes from the outset.
Our team coordinates with title companies, custodians, and other institutions to confirm what form of court order will satisfy their requirements and to reduce obstacles at the final transfer stage. We help trustees compile evidence, prepare sworn statements, and manage service and notice to interested persons under probate rules. For families with military ties, we take extra care to accommodate schedules and documentation that span different locations. We strive to deliver efficient representation tailored to each client’s needs and the facts supporting a petition.
We also focus on limiting conflict and cost by exploring alternatives when appropriate, such as negotiated transfers or stipulated orders that avoid contested hearings. When litigation is necessary, we prepare thoroughly and advocate for the trust’s position with clarity. Our goal is to achieve a court resolution that secures the settlor’s intent and allows trustees to administer assets promptly. Through practical guidance and attentive case management, we work to protect beneficiaries’ interests while following California law and court procedures.
Our process begins with a focused intake to gather trust documents, deeds, account statements, and any evidence of the decedent’s actions to fund the trust. We review the record to assess whether a petition is likely to succeed and advise on alternatives. If a petition is appropriate, we draft the petition and declarations, provide notice to interested parties, file with the probate court, and coordinate any required hearings. Throughout the process we work to keep trustees and beneficiaries informed about timing and steps required by the court and third parties.
The initial step involves collecting all documents related to the trust and the asset in question, including the trust instrument, deeds, cancelled checks, account statements, beneficiary forms, and relevant correspondence. We assess whether the factual record supports a judicial declaration that the property belonged to the trust. This phase includes identifying potential interested persons, evaluating evidence strength, and advising clients on the likely time and costs associated with filing. A thorough upfront assessment improves the likelihood of a successful petition and reduces surprises later.
We carefully review the trust document’s terms and language to determine the settlor’s intent and identify clauses related to funding and ownership. Reviewing title records and deeds helps determine the gap between the trust’s directions and recorded ownership. We look for draft deeds, assignments to trust, or other records showing steps toward transfer. This work identifies any inconsistencies or missing documents that the petition must address and guides the factual narrative used in court filings to show the asset was meant to be trust property.
We gather corroborating evidence such as bank and brokerage records, cancelled checks, emails, and witness statements that document the decedent’s actions and intent. Witness declarations from family members, attorneys, or financial advisors are often key to establishing the settlor’s plan. We work with clients to obtain clear, chronological documentation and to prepare competent declarations that tell a consistent story. Properly assembled evidence reduces the need for additional discovery and strengthens the presentation to the court for a Heggstad petition.
Once documentation is organized, we prepare the formal petition, supporting declarations, exhibits, and required notices to interested parties under California probate rules. The petition sets out the factual basis and legal argument for recognizing the asset as trust property. We file with the appropriate probate court in the county where the trust is administered or the asset is located, manage required service, and respond to any initial court inquiries. Clear, precise filings reduce the likelihood of contested motions and help move the matter toward a hearing or stipulated resolution.
Drafting involves creating a petition that explains the nature of the title defect, cites relevant trust provisions and authority, and attaches exhibits such as deeds, account statements, and declarations. We craft declarations that explain the sequence of events and the decedent’s intent, and we include legal argument showing why the court should recognize the trust’s ownership. Attaching organized and clearly labeled exhibits helps the court and opposing parties evaluate the claim efficiently and often encourages settlements or stipulated orders.
After filing, the petition and notices must be served on interested persons, beneficiaries, heirs, and potential creditors in accordance with probate rules. We handle the service process, prepare proof of service, and respond to inquiries or objections from interested parties. Timely and correct notice is essential to the court accepting the petition and to preserving the record. If objections arise, we evaluate whether resolution by agreement is feasible or whether a hearing will be required to obtain the court’s determination.
If the court requires a hearing, we present the evidence and legal argument supporting the petition, addressing any challenges raised. After the court reviews the record and hears argument, it may issue an order declaring the assets to be trust property, which trustees can use to transfer title, update records, or close accounts. We work with title companies, custodians, and recorders to ensure the order meets their requirements for recording or changing ownership, and we assist trustees in completing administrative tasks following the court’s ruling.
At hearings, we present a coherent narrative supported by declarations and exhibits, answer the court’s questions, and address objections from other parties. Our preparation focuses on demonstrating the decedent’s intent and the factual steps towards funding the trust. We emphasize clarity and organization to assist the judge in rendering a determination. If the court grants the petition, we obtain the signed order and ensure it contains the language necessary for third parties to accept it as evidence of the trust’s ownership.
Once the court issues an order, we coordinate with title companies, banks, and custodial institutions to record deeds, change account ownership, or release funds to the trustee per the trust’s terms. We provide trustees with certified copies of court orders, assist with recording instructions, and help ensure any further administrative filings are properly completed. This final phase turns the court’s declaration into practical transfers and distributions, allowing the trust to be administered effectively and beneficiaries to receive property as intended.
A Heggstad petition is a probate court filing asking the court to declare that certain assets belonged to a trust at the decedent’s death despite defects in recorded title or beneficiary designations. It is used when the trust instrument and surrounding facts indicate the decedent intended the assets to be trust property but administrative steps such as recording a deed or retitling an account were not completed. The petition presents evidence of intent and actions toward funding the trust and seeks a judicial declaration that aligns legal title with that intent. A petition is appropriate when the evidence is strong enough to show the settlor’s clear intent and when a court order is needed to satisfy title companies, custodians, or other third parties. It is not a cure-all for every title problem, but it is an efficient remedy for targeted issues where probate would be more costly or time-consuming. Preparing a persuasive petition requires gathering documentation and witness statements that demonstrate the sequence of events and the decedent’s objective to fund the trust.
Timing for a Heggstad petition varies based on the county calendar, complexity of the evidence, and whether interested parties contest the petition. In many cases, after documents are assembled and the petition is filed, a court hearing will be set several weeks to a few months later depending on the court’s docket. If the petition is uncontested and the supporting record is straightforward, the process can conclude more quickly. When testimony or additional discovery is needed, it may extend the timeline. Proactive preparation and clear documentation can accelerate the process. Prompt service of notice to interested persons and resolving disagreements through stipulated orders when possible will reduce delays. We help clients understand expected timelines in the relevant county and keep them informed as filings move through the court system to avoid unnecessary waiting and additional complications.
Evidence that supports a Heggstad petition includes the trust document itself, draft or executed deeds, canceled checks or bank transfers showing intent to fund the trust, beneficiary designation forms, and correspondence indicating the decedent’s plan. Witness declarations from family members, attorneys, or financial advisors who observed the decedent’s actions or intentions are also persuasive. The totality of this evidence should create a coherent narrative demonstrating the decedent’s intent and the steps taken to accomplish the transfer prior to death. Photocopies of documents, contemporaneous emails, and transaction records that align with the trust’s funding also help. If a deed was prepared but not recorded, the deed draft combined with communications about recording can show intent. Clear chronology and multiple corroborating sources strengthen a petition and improve the chance of a favorable court determination that the asset belonged to the trust.
A successful Heggstad petition results in a court order that the particular asset in question is trust property, which generally avoids probate for that asset. However, the petition must be supported by sufficient evidence of intent and steps toward funding the trust. If the court finds the evidence insufficient or determines the asset did not belong to the trust at death, probate may still be necessary for that asset. Thus outcomes depend heavily on the factual record and legal arguments presented. Even when a petition succeeds, other estate or creditor issues could affect distributions. The petition only addresses ownership for the asset(s) specified; it does not automatically resolve unrelated estate administration issues. Trustees should understand that a Heggstad order resolves title for the named property but may not preclude other proceedings if beneficiaries or creditors raise separate claims.
California probate rules require notice to interested persons when filing a Heggstad petition. Interested persons typically include named beneficiaries under the trust, heirs at law, surviving spouses, and any persons who might claim an interest in the asset. The court will provide guidance on who must be served and how notice must be given. Proper service is critical to allow the court to proceed and to ensure any potential objections can be raised and addressed in a timely manner. Providing complete and accurate notice also reduces the risk of later challenges based on improper procedure. We assist clients in identifying all required interested persons, preparing and serving the appropriate notices, and filing proof of service with the court. This careful attention to procedure helps the court accept the petition and move the case toward resolution.
Costs for pursuing a Heggstad petition vary based on the case complexity, the amount of evidence to assemble, whether the petition is contested, and court fees for filing and service. In straightforward, uncontested matters, fees may be limited to filing costs and reasonable attorney time to prepare documents and coordinate recording. When additional discovery, extensive court hearings, or contested litigation is required, costs increase. Clients should budget for court filing fees, service costs, and fees for copies or certified documents. We provide a clear estimate after an initial review of the facts and documentation. Our goal is to pursue efficient resolutions and to recommend alternatives when cost-effective options exist. Transparent communication about likely expenses and strategies helps clients make informed decisions about whether to proceed with a petition or consider other transfer methods acceptable under the circumstances.
Yes, beneficiaries or interested parties may challenge a Heggstad petition if they disagree about whether the asset belonged to the trust. Objections can raise factual disputes over intent, the sufficiency of evidence, or procedural deficiencies. When a challenge occurs, the court may require additional evidence, hearings, or discovery to resolve competing claims. The presence of disputes may extend the process and increase costs, but the court has tools to evaluate testimony, documents, and the credibility of witnesses in making a determination. When objections arise, we evaluate the grounds and seek to resolve disagreements through negotiation or stipulation when possible. If litigation is necessary, we prepare to present a clear record and respond to objections efficiently. Our focus is on obtaining a court order that enables the trustee to proceed while protecting beneficiary interests and complying with probate procedures.
If a court denies a Heggstad petition, the asset will not be declared trust property under the petition and may require alternative steps to transfer or administer, such as probate administration for that asset. Denial typically reflects insufficient evidence of intent or failure to meet legal requirements. When denial occurs, the interested parties and the trustee can evaluate next steps, which may include additional evidence, an amended petition, or proceeding with probate depending on the circumstances and the asset’s value. We assist clients in assessing the reasons for denial and the viability of further actions. Sometimes additional documentation or clarified testimony can support refiling; other times probate is the only practical path forward. Our advice focuses on efficient resolution tailored to the asset involved and the practical interests of trustees and beneficiaries.
A single Heggstad petition can cover multiple assets if the same factual record and trust intent support inclusion of each asset. Grouping related assets in one petition can be efficient when documentation and witnesses apply to all items. However, when assets involve different jurisdictions, custodians, or distinct factual issues, separate petitions may be more practical. The court and involved institutions may also have preferences about handling multiple assets together or in separate proceedings depending on complexity and location. We evaluate whether consolidating assets in one petition will streamline resolution or create complications and advise accordingly. Our goal is to reduce redundancy, minimize costs, and obtain clear orders that satisfy title companies and custodians so trustees can implement transfers promptly and administer the trust effectively.
Title companies and custodial institutions often require clear, specific court orders before they will update records, record deeds, or change account ownership in favor of a trust when recorded title does not match the trust. A Heggstad order that identifies the asset, explains the factual basis, and directs transfer typically satisfies these parties. We work to draft petitions and proposed orders in forms that title companies and banks recognize so that the post-order administrative steps proceed smoothly without additional impediments. Occasionally, institutions request additional language or verification; when that occurs, we coordinate with them to secure acceptable wording and any certifications required for recording. This collaboration reduces the chances of delays after the court order is issued and helps trustees complete the final steps of transferring and recording property consistent with the trust terms.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas