If you created a trust years ago and your family or financial circumstances have changed, a trust modification petition can bring your estate plan up to date. Residents of Challenge-Brownsville and Yuba County turn to the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for clear guidance when they need to correct language, change trustees, add or remove assets, or address tax and beneficiary updates. A properly prepared petition helps the court recognize and implement changes to a trust document, minimizing confusion and protecting the wishes of the trustmaker. This introduction explains when a petition is appropriate and what to expect from the process.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed in probate or superior court to change the terms of a trust when direct amendment is not possible or when court confirmation is advisable. Common reasons include ambiguous language, changed family relationships, creditor concerns, or transfers that were overlooked. Our firm handles petitions that clarify intent, adjust trustee powers, or modify distribution provisions, and we work to keep the process efficient and respectful of your goals. Call 408-528-2827 to discuss whether a petition is the right path for your trust in Challenge-Brownsville and surrounding communities.
Trust modifications can preserve the original intent of the trustmaker while adapting the trust to present realities. Updating a trust can avoid disputes among beneficiaries, correct drafting mistakes, reflect changes in relationships or finances, and reduce unintended tax consequences. For families in Challenge-Brownsville, a timely modification petition can prevent delays in administering trust assets and limit the scope for contesting parties to raise objections. Effective modifications promote clarity, help ensure assets pass according to current wishes, and can streamline administration for trustees and successors when the trust document accurately reflects the trustmaker’s present choices.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, based in San Jose and serving Challenge-Brownsville and Yuba County, focuses on personalized estate planning and trust litigation matters. Robert P. Bergman and the team work directly with clients to review trust documents, identify legal issues, and prepare the filings needed to request court approval when informal amendments are not effective. We emphasize clear communication, careful document review, and practical strategies that reflect each client’s values and goals. Our approach balances respect for family dynamics with an eye toward efficient resolution and responsible stewardship of trust assets.
A trust modification petition is used when a trust cannot be changed through simple amendment or when a court’s interpretation or approval is necessary to resolve ambiguity, correct mistakes, or reflect changed circumstances. Petition types vary: some ask the court to reform the trust to match the trustmaker’s intent, others request interpretation, and some seek approval for modifications agreed upon by beneficiaries. The petition outlines proposed changes, supporting facts, and legal grounds. For many clients, this process provides legal certainty and a clear record of the change, reducing the risk of future litigation or administrative delays.
The process generally begins with a careful review of the trust and supporting documents, including any related wills, deeds, or beneficiary designations. We assess whether the trustmaker had capacity at the time of the change, whether all required procedures were followed, and whether any interested parties must be notified. When filing, the petition requests the court to order the requested relief and may seek a declaration regarding the true meaning of certain provisions. The court then considers evidence, hears from interested parties, and issues an order implementing the appropriate modifications or clarifications.
A trust modification petition is a legal filing that asks a court to change, interpret, or reform a trust document. This remedy is appropriate when the trust instrument contains mistakes, ambiguous language, or provisions that no longer reflect the trustmaker’s current circumstances. Modifications may address trustee powers, distribution timing, beneficiary designations, or tax-saving features. In some cases, modifications correct clerical errors or confirm transfers that were omitted from the trust. The petition explains the requested adjustments and provides evidence demonstrating why the court should approve them to honor the trustmaker’s true intent.
A successful petition typically includes the original trust or relevant excerpts, a proposed amended version if applicable, factual declarations explaining the need for change, and supporting exhibits such as letters, medical records, or contemporaneous notes that show intent. Notice to interested parties is essential unless waived, and the petition must comply with local court rules governing trust matters. After filing, the court may set a hearing, allow written opposition, and weigh the evidence. Judges consider the trustmaker’s intent, capacity, and any undue influence concerns in deciding whether to grant the requested relief.
Understanding the language used in trust petitions helps clients make informed decisions. This glossary covers commonly used terms in trust modification matters so you can follow the process with confidence. Definitions include the roles of trustees and beneficiaries, legal concepts such as reformation and interpretation, procedural elements like notice and hearings, and documents commonly involved, including pour-over wills, certifications of trust, and power of attorney forms. Clear definitions reduce uncertainty and help families determine what type of petition is appropriate for their circumstances.
Reformation refers to a court-ordered correction of a trust document to reflect the trustmaker’s actual intent when the written terms fail to capture that intent due to mistake or drafting error. A petition for reformation requires evidence demonstrating what the trustmaker intended and why the written language does not reflect that intent. Courts may grant reformation when it serves to uphold the true wishes of the trustmaker and when doing so aligns with applicable law. This remedy is distinct from amendment and is used when a direct amendment is not feasible or was not properly executed.
Trust interpretation is the process by which a court determines the meaning of ambiguous or unclear provisions within a trust document. When language can reasonably be read in multiple ways, a petition for interpretation asks the court to clarify how the disputed provision should apply to particular circumstances or beneficiaries. The court examines the trust as a whole, relevant extrinsic evidence, and the trustmaker’s intent to reach a fair and practical interpretation that resolves disputes and guides trustees in administration.
Modification by court order occurs when the court formally alters trust terms to address changed circumstances, unforeseen conditions, or legal issues that make the original provisions impracticable or inconsistent with the trustmaker’s likely wishes. This remedy may be sought when beneficiaries agree or when a trustee seeks clarification or authority to act. The court evaluates the necessity and fairness of the modification, balancing the trustmaker’s intent with the needs of beneficiaries and any relevant policy considerations in the applicable jurisdiction.
Notice refers to the requirement to inform beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested parties about a petition and any hearings so they have an opportunity to be heard. Proper notice helps protect due process rights and reduces the risk of later challenges based on lack of notice. Interested parties may include current and remainder beneficiaries, trustees, personal representatives under related wills, and sometimes creditors. Courts expect clear documentation of who was notified and how notice was provided in trust modification cases.
When trust terms need to change, there are multiple pathways: a straightforward amendment if the trustmaker has capacity and the trust permits amendment; a voluntary agreement among beneficiaries to modify terms; a court petition to reform or interpret the trust; or, in contested matters, litigation. An informal amendment is fastest but not always possible. Agreements can be efficient but require trustee and beneficiary cooperation. A petition provides formal validation from the court when clarity or enforceability is needed. Choosing the right option depends on the trust language, parties involved, and the nature of the issue being addressed.
If the trustmaker is available and has the legal capacity to act, making an amendment directly to the trust can be the most efficient path. A straightforward amendment can update beneficiaries, trustee appointments, or distribution instructions without involving the court. This approach requires proper execution under the trust’s terms and applicable state law. It is often appropriate when changes are minor, uncontroversial, and there is consensus among those affected. Documentation should be clear and stored with the original trust to avoid future misunderstandings.
In some situations, all interested beneficiaries may agree to a modification and sign a written agreement that adjusts the trust terms. When beneficiaries with vested interests consent in writing and the trust permits modification by consent, this approach can avoid court involvement. Agreements should be drafted carefully to ensure they are legally binding and to confirm that the modification does not harm the interests of any protected beneficiaries. Properly documented agreements are often faster and less costly than formal petitions, but they require full participation and clear understanding among all parties.
When trust provisions are ambiguous or family members dispute the trustmaker’s intent, a comprehensive legal approach helps gather evidence, prepare persuasive declarations, and present the matter to the court with clarity. This includes careful review of related documents like wills, powers of attorney, certifications of trust, and financial records to reconstruct the trustmaker’s intentions. A thorough approach anticipates potential objections, addresses capacity or undue influence concerns, and seeks an outcome that protects beneficiaries and the integrity of the trust administration.
Complex asset structures, retirement plans, insurance trusts, or potential tax consequences can make trust modifications more intricate and sensitive. A comprehensive legal strategy ensures coordination among trustees, financial advisors, and tax professionals to design modifications that preserve asset value and minimize unintended consequences. For example, changes to irrevocable trusts or life insurance trusts require careful planning to protect tax benefits and creditor protections. When stakes are high, thorough legal work reduces the risk of costly mistakes or disputes that can undermine the trustmaker’s objectives.
A comprehensive approach combines diligent document review, careful notice to interested parties, and strategic preparation of evidence and legal arguments. This method reduces the chance of future litigation, helps ensure the court understands the trustmaker’s intent, and provides durable orders that guide trustees and beneficiaries. In jurisdictions like California, thorough preparation also addresses procedural requirements and timing considerations so the process proceeds on a sound footing. Clients receive a plan tailored to their trust’s terms and the family’s particular needs, increasing the likelihood of a satisfactory outcome.
Comprehensive representation often leads to clearer, enforceable results that minimize administrative burdens for trustees and reduce friction among beneficiaries. Where necessary, it includes coordination with financial and tax professionals, secure handling of sensitive records, and careful drafting of proposed orders to avoid ambiguity. This proactive work saves time and expense down the road by preventing remedial disputes and ensuring that trust assets are administered in alignment with the trustmaker’s updated wishes. The result is greater certainty for all parties involved in trust administration.
When a court issues an order approving a trust modification or interpreting a trust, that order provides legal clarity and finality that informal changes cannot match. Durable orders reduce the chances of future disputes and give trustees clear authority to carry out their duties under the revised terms. This stability is especially valuable when large assets, retirement accounts, or property titles are involved, as third parties and financial institutions often require formal documentation and court direction before they will accept changes to ownership or beneficiary designations.
A comprehensive approach helps ensure trustees act with confidence and within the scope of the court’s order, lowering the risk of later claims alleging breach of fiduciary duty. Clear court orders guide trustees in distributions, investments, and other administrative duties, while beneficiaries gain reassurance that their interests were considered and preserved. This process also supports transparent communication and proper recordkeeping, which strengthens trust administration and helps avoid costly litigation or misunderstandings among family members and interested parties.
Begin by collecting the original trust document, all amendments, related wills such as pour-over wills, certification of trust forms, powers of attorney, HIPAA authorizations, and any communication that reflects the trustmaker’s intent. Accurate and complete documentation is essential to show what the trustmaker wanted and to support a petition for reformation or interpretation. Missing documents can delay proceedings or require additional evidence. Keeping organized records of asset transfers and beneficiary communications will streamline the process and help present a persuasive, well-supported case to the court.
Before seeking a modification, evaluate how changes might affect tax treatment, retirement accounts, life insurance trusts, and real property titles. Some modifications could alter estate or income tax consequences or require re-titling of assets to reflect new trustee arrangements. Coordination with accountants, financial planners, and title professionals can prevent unintended results. Anticipating these issues and addressing them proactively in the petition or proposed order helps protect the value of trust assets and ensures administrative steps are completed accurately after the court approves any changes.
Consider a trust modification petition when the written trust no longer reflects the trustmaker’s intentions due to life events such as divorce, remarriage, births, deaths, or changes in financial circumstances. Other reasons include errors in drafting, ambiguity that leads to conflicting interpretations, failure to include assets meant to be governed by the trust, or legal issues that require court clarification such as capacity questions. A petition can provide an authoritative resolution that protects beneficiaries and clarifies the trustee’s authority to act under the revised terms.
You should also consider a petition when third parties, including financial institutions or title companies, require a court order to accept changes to account or property ownership, or when the administrator needs assurance to act without exposure to liability. When family dynamics create the potential for disputes or when certain beneficiaries require special protective arrangements, a carefully prepared petition can achieve a balanced and enforceable result. Seeking legal review early prevents escalation and increases the likelihood of achieving durable solutions for trust administration.
Typical circumstances include discovered drafting errors, omitted assets that were intended to be included in the trust, changes in beneficiaries’ needs, trustee incapacity or resignation, and new tax or estate planning considerations. Petition filings also arise when trustee powers are unclear or when successor trustees require court direction to manage complex assets. Other triggers include the need to split or merge trusts, correct beneficiary designations on retirement accounts, or address protective arrangements for beneficiaries with special needs or creditor exposure. Understanding these triggers helps identify the best course of action.
Drafting errors such as incorrect beneficiary names, unclear distribution instructions, or failure to include certain assets can undermine a trust’s effectiveness. When an error is discovered, a petition can ask the court to reform the document to reflect what the trustmaker intended. The court will review evidence such as earlier drafts, correspondence, and other records to determine whether reformation is appropriate. Correcting mistakes through a petition provides legal clarity and avoids unintended distributions or administrative confusion.
Life changes such as births, deaths, marriages, divorces, or changes in a beneficiary’s financial needs often require trust updates. When the trustmaker is unavailable to execute a formal amendment or when beneficiaries disagree about the proper approach, a petition provides a pathway to align the trust with current realities. Courts consider the trustmaker’s original intent and the fairness of the requested changes. Modifications can protect vulnerable beneficiaries and ensure distributions reflect the trustmaker’s updated priorities.
Situations involving trustee incapacity, resignation, or disputes over fiduciary authority can necessitate court involvement. A petition can request appointment of a successor trustee, clarification of trustee powers, or approval for certain transactions that might otherwise be questioned. When assets are complex or involve retirement plans, insurance, or business interests, court orders provide the legal authority needed to manage, transfer, or sell assets in the trust’s best interest. This protects trustees and beneficiaries and supports orderly administration.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients in Challenge-Brownsville and Yuba County with focused attention on trust modification petitions and related estate planning matters. We assist with petitions to reform or interpret trusts, prepare supporting declarations and exhibits, and ensure proper notice and procedural compliance. Our goal is to provide responsive representation tailored to each family’s circumstances, helping to reduce uncertainty and move matters toward resolution. Reach out at 408-528-2827 for a focused discussion about the specific changes you need to make to a trust.
Clients choose our firm for clear communication, practical problem solving, and a thorough approach to trust modification petitions. We begin by listening to your concerns, reviewing documents in detail, and explaining the range of legal options available in plain language. Whether the matter can be resolved by agreement or needs court involvement, we prepare a focused plan to achieve a durable result that reflects the trustmaker’s current intent while protecting beneficiary interests. Our office strives to be accessible and responsive throughout the process.
Our representation includes careful preparation of petitions, meticulous attention to notice requirements, and coordination with financial and tax advisors when needed. We present evidence and proposed orders in a manner designed to reduce ambiguity and avoid future disputes. Clients benefit from practical guidance on post-order steps such as re-titling assets, updating beneficiary designations, and documenting the court’s decision for institutions and trustees. Every matter receives individualized attention to ensure the requested changes are implemented effectively.
When contested matters arise, we focus on resolving disputes efficiently through negotiation or court processes while safeguarding our clients’ interests and preserving family relationships where possible. We prepare persuasive declarations and supporting exhibits, manage required disclosures, and advocate for outcomes that are fair and sustainable. Our goal is to secure predictable, enforceable results so trustees can carry out their duties with confidence and beneficiaries can understand their rights and expectations under the modified trust.
Our process begins with a detailed intake and document review to understand the trust terms, any prior amendments, related estate planning documents, and the facts that support a modification. We evaluate whether an informal amendment, beneficiary agreement, or court petition is the best approach. If a petition is required, we prepare declarations, gather supporting evidence, identify interested parties for notice, draft the proposed order, and file with the appropriate court. We then manage the hearing process and guide implementation of the court’s order to ensure assets and records are updated accordingly.
The first step is a comprehensive review of the trust document and any related instruments such as pour-over wills, powers of attorney, certifications of trust, and asset transfer records. We interview the trustmaker and key witnesses when available, gather evidence of intent, and assess who must be notified. Based on the findings, we recommend whether an informal amendment, beneficiary agreement, or formal petition best fits the circumstances. This strategy phase sets expectations on timing, likely outcomes, and necessary documentation for pursuing the chosen path.
Collecting the original trust, all amendments, related wills, account statements, deeds, correspondence, and any medical or financial records is essential to build the factual record. We prepare declarations from the trustmaker and witnesses, compile exhibits, and identify any documents that help demonstrate intent or clarify ambiguous language. A well-documented evidentiary record increases the likelihood of an efficient hearing and a clear court order. Attention to these details can prevent unnecessary delays and strengthen the petition’s persuasive value.
Identifying who must receive notice is a critical procedural step. Interested parties often include current and remainder beneficiaries, trustees, personal representatives under related wills, and sometimes creditors or public entities with stakes in the trust. Proper service and proof of notice are required by court rules and protect the process from later challenges. We prepare clear notice documents and manage service to ensure compliance, documenting each step so the court has the required record to proceed with the petition.
After preparing the petition and supporting materials, we file with the appropriate probate or superior court and serve the petition on interested parties. The court may schedule a hearing, allow written objections, or request additional information. We respond to oppositions, submit declarations and exhibits, and advocate for the remedies that protect our client’s interests. Throughout this phase, we monitor deadlines and procedural requirements to keep the case on track and to protect the client from procedural defects that might affect the outcome.
When objections arise, we engage in discussions to identify areas of agreement and explore possible settlements that resolve disputes without a contested hearing. Mediation or negotiated stipulations can often lead to practical resolutions that save time and expense. If settlement is not possible, we prepare responses to objections, gather additional evidence, and advocate for the requested relief at hearing. Maintaining open lines of communication while preparing a firm legal position helps preserve options and often leads to better outcomes for clients and beneficiaries alike.
At the hearing, the court evaluates evidence, hears from interested parties, and decides whether to grant the petition for reformation, interpretation, or modification. We present clear declarations, witness testimony when necessary, and documentary proof to support the requested relief. The goal is to obtain a precise order that implements the agreed or requested changes. After the hearing, we ensure the court’s order is properly entered and advise on the next steps for implementing changes to assets, account titles, and beneficiary records.
Once the court issues an order, we assist with practical implementation tasks such as recording orders where required, providing certified copies of the order and certification of trust to financial institutions, updating deed titles, and coordinating with tax and financial advisors on reporting implications. We help trustees follow the court’s directives for distributions and administration, and provide documentation that institutions often require to accept changes. Proper follow-through ensures the court’s decision is reflected in asset handling and beneficiary arrangements.
After obtaining the court’s order, it is important to provide certified copies to banks, title companies, retirement plan administrators, and insurance carriers as needed. If the order affects real property, recording the order or an accompanying deed may be required to update public records. We prepare cover letters and documentation packages to present to institutions, explain the court’s directives, and facilitate acceptance of the changes. This step helps ensure the trust’s revised terms are recognized and followed by third parties.
Following implementation, trustees must administer the trust according to the modified terms and maintain accurate records of distributions and decisions. We advise trustees on compliance with the court order, recordkeeping practices, and any continuing reporting obligations. If future issues arise, having a clear order and documented process reduces uncertainty and supports stable administration. Our role continues as needed to answer questions, assist with further filings, or advise on related estate planning updates to reflect the trustmaker’s evolving objectives.
Amending a trust typically involves the trustmaker executing a written amendment or restatement while they have capacity and authority to do so. This process is often quick and keeps the change internal to the trust without court involvement, provided the trust instrument allows for amendment. A direct amendment is the preferred route when the trustmaker can act and all formalities under the trust and state law are satisfied. A trust modification petition is used when direct amendment is not possible or when court validation is needed. Reasons include ambiguous language, drafting errors, omitted assets, questions about the trustmaker’s capacity at the time of execution, or situations where third parties require a court order to accept changes. A petition creates a formal record and court order that resolves disputes or clarifies the trust’s terms for trustees and institutions.
In California, a petition may be necessary when the trust document contains ambiguous provisions that trustees or beneficiaries interpret differently, when the trustmaker is unavailable or lacks capacity to sign an amendment, or when a mistake in draft terms needs correction. Courts also handle petitions that seek reformation to reflect the trustmaker’s intent when extrinsic evidence supports that intent. The petition process helps ensure modifications are enforceable and recognized by third parties. Another common scenario is when beneficiaries or trustees need authoritative direction to manage or distribute complex assets, or when institutions require a court order before changing account ownership or beneficiary designations. A court-approved modification provides the legal certainty needed to carry out those transactions without exposing trustees to undue risk of liability.
The timeline for a trust modification petition varies depending on the complexity of the matter, the level of opposition from interested parties, and the court’s schedule. Simple, uncontested petitions with clear supporting evidence can proceed more quickly, sometimes resolving within a few months. When multiple parties object, additional discovery or hearings may extend the process and increase the timeline. Preparation time is an important factor. Gathering documents, preparing declarations, and ensuring proper notice can take several weeks. After filing, court calendars and required waiting periods influence how soon a hearing can be set. Clear preparation and cooperative parties often shorten the overall timeline, while contested matters generally require more time to reach a final resolution.
Notice typically must be given to all current beneficiaries, remainder beneficiaries, successor trustees, and other interested parties identified in the trust or under applicable law. Proper service ensures that those whose rights may be affected have the opportunity to be heard and to object if they choose. The rules governing notice and service methods vary, so following local court procedures is important to prevent procedural defects that could jeopardize the petition. In some cases, additional parties such as personal representatives under related wills, creditors, or governmental entities may also require notice. If any interested party cannot be located, courts provide procedures for alternative notice or substituted service. Detailed attention to notice requirements is essential for a smooth court process and for preserving the enforceability of any order entered.
Beneficiaries can challenge a court-approved modification, but once a court issues a final order, overturning that decision typically requires demonstrating legal error, newly discovered evidence, fraud, or similar grounds for relief. Courts do not lightly reopen final judgments, so a well-prepared petition with clear evidence reduces the likelihood of successful challenges. Ensuring that procedural requirements, including notice and opportunity to be heard, were met helps preserve the finality of the order. If a beneficiary believes the court did not properly consider relevant evidence or that there was fraud or misrepresentation, they may seek to set aside the order within the timeframes allowed by law. However, such actions are often difficult and require compelling proof. Achieving a durable and clear order during the initial proceeding is the best protection against later challenges.
Helpful evidence for a reformation petition includes prior drafts of the trust or related documents, written correspondence that reflects the trustmaker’s intent, contemporaneous notes, affidavits from witnesses who observed the trustmaker’s statements, and medical or financial records that corroborate capacity and circumstances. Declarations from the trustmaker, family members, or advisors can clarify intent when linked to supporting documentation. The more consistent and contemporaneous the evidence, the stronger the showing to the court. Additional records such as account statements, deeds, beneficiary designation forms, and any documents that demonstrate the intended disposition of assets also support a petition. Demonstrating a pattern of practice or a clear expectation that certain assets were to be included in the trust strengthens the request for reformation. Courts weigh the totality of the evidence to determine whether rewriting or interpreting the document aligns with the trustmaker’s true wishes.
A court order that modifies a trust often requires trustees and institutions to retitle assets, update account beneficiaries, or make changes to property records to reflect the revised arrangement. Financial institutions and title companies commonly request a certified copy of the court order and a certification of trust to accept changes. When retirement accounts or life insurance policies are involved, administrators may have specific procedures to follow to register the court’s decision. Because different institutions have varying requirements, part of the post-order work is coordinating with banks, brokerage firms, retirement plan administrators, and title companies to ensure they accept and implement the court’s directives. We assist clients in preparing the documentation package and communicating with institutions to facilitate the practical steps required after a successful petition.
Modifying a trust can have tax implications depending on the nature of the changes and the types of assets involved. For instance, transferring assets into or out of certain irrevocable arrangements, changing income distribution provisions, or altering beneficiaries of retirement accounts can affect estate tax, gift tax, or income tax consequences. Evaluating potential tax outcomes before implementing changes helps preserve tax benefits and avoids unintended liabilities. Coordination with a tax advisor or accountant is recommended when tax-sensitive assets are part of the trust. We work with financial professionals to identify tax considerations and structure modifications to protect asset value. Part of the petition process includes planning for any tax reporting or compliance steps needed after the court’s order is implemented.
Yes, a trust modification petition can address protective provisions such as those in special needs trusts or pet trusts, though changes may require careful drafting to preserve the protections those arrangements provide. For special needs trusts, maintaining eligibility for public benefits is often a primary concern, so modifications must be crafted to avoid jeopardizing benefits. Courts will consider whether proposed changes maintain the trustmaker’s protective intent for vulnerable beneficiaries. Pet trusts and other specific-purpose trusts can also be modified by petition to update funding, caretakers, or distribution schedules. Because these trusts serve particular needs, the petition should explain how the changes further the trustmaker’s intent and protect the intended beneficiaries or care recipients. Clear evidence and careful drafting help secure court approval while preserving the trust’s protective features.
To begin the process, gather the trust document, any amendments, and related estate planning instruments, and contact the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman for an initial discussion. We will review the documents and facts, explain whether an amendment, beneficiary agreement, or petition is most appropriate, and outline the likely steps and timing. Early document collection and disclosure of family or financial changes help us recommend the best path forward. If a petition is advised, we prepare the required filings, gather supporting declarations and exhibits, identify interested parties for notice, and file with the appropriate court. We keep clients informed throughout the process and coordinate with financial and tax professionals as needed. Starting with a complete file and early legal guidance helps achieve a clearer, more efficient outcome.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas