If you are considering changes to an existing trust in Loma Rica, a trust modification petition can be the right path to update terms, beneficiaries, or administrative provisions. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman, our approach focuses on clear communication and careful review of trust documents to determine whether a petition is appropriate under California law. A trust modification petition is often used to reflect changed family circumstances, correct drafting errors, or adapt to changes in tax or asset structures. We help clients understand the legal criteria and potential outcomes so they can make informed decisions about modifying a trust.
Modifying a trust can affect distribution timing, powers of trustees, or conditions placed on beneficiaries. Whether you are a trustee seeking clarity on your authority, a beneficiary requesting a change, or a settlor who retains modification rights, the process requires attention to procedural details and court requirements. Our office serves residents of Loma Rica and the surrounding areas, aiming to minimize conflict while protecting client interests. We explain timelines, document preparation, and possible court hearings so clients know what to expect from the petition process and how to preserve important estate planning goals.
A properly prepared trust modification petition provides a legal framework for updating arrangements made in a trust to reflect present realities. Benefits include correcting drafting errors, adjusting for changed family dynamics, addressing tax or financial concerns, and clarifying trustee powers to avoid future disputes. When handled thoughtfully, a petition can prevent contested litigation later by bringing changes before a court for approval, ensuring that the modified terms are enforceable and consistent with state law. The process preserves the settlor’s intent where possible and provides beneficiaries insight into revised distribution plans, reducing uncertainty and protecting estate assets.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provides estate planning services from our San Jose and regional practice that include trust creation, modification petitions, and related petitions such as Heggstad and trust modification proceedings. Our firm assists clients throughout California, including Loma Rica and Yuba County, focusing on careful review of trust instruments and court procedures. We prioritize clear client communication and practical legal guidance to help clients pursue modifications while managing risks. Call us at 408-528-2827 for an initial consultation to discuss whether a petition is appropriate for your situation and how to proceed in line with your objectives.
A trust modification petition is a court proceeding used to change the terms of an existing trust when circumstances make the original provisions impractical or inconsistent with the settlor’s intent. The petition may request clarification, correction, reformation, or modification of specific trust provisions. California courts consider factors such as the settlor’s intent, statutory requirements, and whether the change would impair beneficiary rights. The petition process often requires detailed factual declarations, supporting trust documents, and clear legal grounds for the requested relief. Preparing a solid petition increases the chance of a favorable resolution while reducing the potential for controversy among interested parties.
Different types of petitions can be appropriate depending on the circumstances, including petitions to modify a trust due to changed circumstances, petitions to clarify ambiguous terms, or Heggstad petitions to transfer assets that were intended to be in trust but were not properly funded. The formal petition outlines the requested changes and the legal authority supporting them. Interested parties may be served and have the opportunity to respond. The court may hold a hearing and issue an order granting the modification if it finds the requested changes consistent with law and any relevant testamentary intent.
A trust modification petition is a formal request submitted to the probate court asking the judge to approve changes to a trust document or the way it is administered. Common reasons to file include fixing drafting mistakes, adapting trust terms to unexpected life events, or resolving ambiguities that interfere with administration. Petitions must state facts supporting the change and cite the legal basis for court intervention. The goal is to obtain a judicial order that makes the change legally binding and reduces future disputes. Parties potentially affected by the change are typically notified and may contest the petition before the court rules.
Effective petitions include a clear statement of the requested modification, relevant excerpts from the trust, declarations from interested parties, and evidence supporting the need for change. The process begins with reviewing the trust instrument and gathering facts about why modification is necessary. Next, the petition is drafted and filed with the appropriate probate court, followed by service on beneficiaries and interested parties. Responses or objections can lead to negotiation or a hearing. The court evaluates the petition based on statutory standards and any applicable case law before issuing an order granting or denying the requested modification.
Understanding common terms can make the petition process less intimidating. Terms such as settlor, trustee, beneficiary, Heggstad petition, reformation, and pour-over will appear frequently when discussing trust modifications. Knowing what each term means and how it applies to your case helps you make informed decisions and communicate effectively with counsel. Below are definitions of several key concepts relevant to trust modification petitions and the broader estate planning context in California, presented to clarify procedural and substantive issues you may encounter.
The settlor is the person who created the trust and whose directions and intent govern the trust document. In modification proceedings, courts often look to the settlor’s expressed intent when determining whether a requested change aligns with original goals. If the settlor is alive and retains certain powers in the trust instrument, those retained powers can affect how changes are made. Where the settlor is deceased, evidence of intent and the circumstances surrounding the trust’s creation become important to whether the court will approve a modification petition. Clear documentation helps establish the settlor’s wishes.
A Heggstad petition addresses situations where assets intended to be held in trust were not properly transferred into the trust during the settlor’s lifetime. This petition asks the court to recognize the trust’s ownership of those assets despite the lack of formal funding. The court will consider evidence showing the settlor’s intent to place the assets in the trust, such as trust documents, transfer attempts, and surrounding circumstances. A successful Heggstad petition can prevent probate for those assets and achieve the settlor’s original placement goals without undoing the trust structure.
Reformation is a legal remedy in which the court alters the terms of a trust to correct mistakes or align the document with the settlor’s true intent. Reformation is not used lightly; it requires convincing evidence that the document fails to reflect what the settlor intended due to a drafting error or other mistake. The petitioner must present clear factual support such as contemporaneous drafts, correspondence, or other evidence showing the intended terms. When granted, reformation makes the trust reflect what the settlor meant, rather than what the written document says.
A pour-over will works alongside a trust to ensure assets not transferred to the trust during the settlor’s lifetime are distributed to the trust at the settlor’s death. In the context of modification petitions, a pour-over will can be relevant when assets intended for the trust are mishandled or when the trust terms are revised and coordination with testamentary documents is necessary. If a pour-over will exists, the court may look at how it interacts with the trust and whether the pour-over mechanism succeeds in carrying out the settlor’s estate planning objectives without producing unintended consequences.
When changes to a trust are needed, there are multiple options to consider, such as informal amendments if the settlor retains authority, petitions for judicial modification, or reformation actions to correct drafting errors. Informal approaches may be quicker and less costly when the settlor is competent and retains modification powers, but they may not bind all interested parties or resolve disputes. Court petitions provide authoritative resolution and reduce future litigation risk but involve formal procedures and potential hearings. Choosing the right path depends on the trust language, the settlor’s status, and whether beneficiaries consent to proposed changes.
If the trust document explicitly grants the settlor the authority to amend or revoke the trust during their lifetime, limited changes can often be made without court involvement. In such cases, the settlor may execute a formal amendment or restatement that reflects the desired changes and follow any procedural formalities required by the trust instrument and state law. This route can be efficient and maintain confidentiality, provided the settlor is competent and there are no disputes among beneficiaries. Proper documentation and adherence to trust terms remain essential to ensure enforceability.
When all interested parties agree to a proposed change, they may be able to execute a written agreement or execute a trust amendment by consent, avoiding court petitions. This collaborative approach works well for noncontroversial revisions such as correcting a typo, updating contact information, or clarifying administrative provisions. While beneficiary agreement can simplify the process, it is important to memorialize consent in writing to prevent future challenges. Even with consensus, ensuring the change complies with the trust terms and state law provides long-term protection for all parties involved.
When beneficiaries disagree about the meaning of trust provisions or whether a proposed change advances the settlor’s intent, a court petition can provide a definitive resolution. Judicial involvement ensures that modifications are made according to legal standards and that all interested parties receive notice and an opportunity to be heard. This is particularly important when ambiguities affect significant assets or distribution rights. The court process creates a binding order that reduces uncertainty and helps prevent future litigation over the same issues, which can safeguard estate assets and clarify trustee duties moving forward.
Modifications that involve tax planning, irrevocable trusts, or complicated asset transfers often require careful legal analysis and may benefit from a formal petition to obtain court approval. When changing terms could impact tax treatment, creditor protection, or third-party rights, court review helps ensure that the modification aligns with legal requirements and preserves the trust’s intended structure. The process typically involves gathering financial documentation, consulting with tax advisors when necessary, and presenting a persuasive factual and legal record to the court to support the requested relief.
A comprehensive approach includes a full review of the trust instrument, related estate planning documents, and relevant financial records to evaluate the best course of action. This method reduces the risk of unintended consequences, helps identify asset transfer issues such as unfunded accounts, and ensures that any modification fits within the broader estate plan. By considering tax, creditor, and beneficiary implications, a comprehensive strategy seeks to preserve the settlor’s overall goals while adapting to new circumstances, creating a durable solution that can withstand challenges.
Thorough planning and documentation also improve the likelihood that a court will grant a requested modification and provide clarity for trustees responsible for administration. Comprehensive preparation includes drafting clear proposed orders, compiling supporting declarations, and securing beneficiary notifications or consents when possible. This attention to detail can shorten proceedings and yield enforceable results. Ultimately, addressing both the legal and practical aspects of a trust modification helps reduce future disputes and streamlines trust administration for trustees and beneficiaries alike.
When a modification is pursued with careful legal preparation, the resulting court order or documented amendment provides clarity and enforceability for trustees and beneficiaries. This certainty helps trustees act with confidence and reduces the chance of later disputes over distributions or management decisions. An authoritative resolution protects the trust assets and helps beneficiaries understand the revised plan. Properly executed modifications also create a reliable record for future reference, which is valuable when trustees change or when beneficiaries seek to understand the trust’s terms over time.
A carefully prepared petition and comprehensive documentation reduce the risk that beneficiaries or creditors will successfully challenge a modification later on. Having the court review and approve changes adds legal weight to the modification and makes it harder for adverse parties to contest the results. This protective effect can save time and costs in the long run, especially when significant assets or complex trust terms are involved. The peace of mind that comes from knowing changes are legally supported benefits trustees and beneficiaries alike.
Collecting trust documents, prior amendments, related wills, account statements, deeds, and correspondence is essential before filing a petition. Clear documentation of the settlor’s intent and prior attempts to fund the trust provides the factual basis needed for many petitions, including Heggstad or reformation petitions. Well-organized evidence allows for a more persuasive petition and can expedite the court process by reducing requests for supplemental materials. Presenting a complete record supports a smoother proceeding and helps the court understand the context for the requested change.
Evaluate whether less formal options such as trust amendments, beneficiary agreements, or trustee actions are sufficient before initiating a court petition. If the settlor retains amendment powers or if beneficiaries consent, those paths can save time and expense while achieving the desired result. However, if disagreements or legal uncertainties exist, a court petition provides finality and formal recognition. Weighing the costs and benefits of each route helps determine the most effective strategy for your situation while protecting estate planning goals and fiduciary responsibilities.
Consider a petition when trust terms no longer reflect family circumstances or financial realities, when drafting errors create ambiguity, or when assets intended for the trust were not properly transferred. Court-approved modifications are particularly useful when beneficiaries disagree or when changes may affect tax or creditor considerations. A petition helps ensure the modification is legally recognized and enforceable, reducing the risk of future contests. Reviewing the trust and related documents with counsel can help identify whether a petition is the most appropriate remedy for your situation.
Other situations calling for a petition include trustee disputes over authority, the need to correct an oversight that undermines funding, or evolving circumstances such as changes in beneficiary needs. A petition can also address administrative matters like clarifying distribution timing or modifying trustee powers to improve trust management. Because the court process provides formal oversight, it is a powerful tool for securing lasting solutions when informal steps are insufficient or when the interests of multiple parties must be balanced under the law.
Typical triggers for trust modification petitions include discovery of unfunded assets, changes in family relationships, drafting mistakes in the trust document, or disputes about the settlor’s intent. Other common scenarios are when a trustee needs explicit authority to act in a new situation or when a beneficiary’s circumstances have changed substantially and warrant altered distributions. Understanding these common patterns can help trustees and beneficiaries recognize when legal intervention is advisable and prepare the necessary documentation to support a petition.
When assets intended to be part of the trust were not properly transferred, the trust may not function as planned and assets could become subject to probate. A Heggstad petition or related court proceeding can ask the court to recognize that certain assets were meant to be trust property despite the absence of formal transfer. Documentation showing the settlor’s intent and any steps taken to transfer the assets will be important. Resolving funding issues through the proper legal process helps keep assets aligned with the settlor’s estate plan and avoids unintended probate administration.
Life changes such as divorce, remarriage, the birth of children, or significant financial shifts may render original trust terms inappropriate. Petitions can address these changed circumstances by modifying distribution provisions, updating contingent beneficiary designations, or clarifying trustee powers to reflect current needs. The court examines whether a modification is consistent with the settlor’s intent and considers the impact on beneficiaries. Thoughtful legal guidance ensures that modifications respond to new realities while preserving the essential purposes of the trust.
Errors in drafting or ambiguous language can hinder trust administration and provoke disagreement among beneficiaries. Reformation or clarification petitions aim to correct the document to reflect what the settlor meant to accomplish. Presenting evidence such as earlier drafts, correspondence, or other records that illuminate the settlor’s intent strengthens the case for reformation. Addressing these issues through the court can produce a definitive and enforceable resolution, allowing trustees to administer the trust effectively and beneficiaries to receive distributions as intended.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman is available to assist clients in Loma Rica and Yuba County with trust modification petitions and related estate planning matters. We help review trust documents, gather supporting evidence, prepare petitions, and navigate probate court procedures. Our focus is on clear communication and practical solutions that reflect client goals. You can reach our office at 408-528-2827 to discuss whether a modification petition is appropriate for your circumstances and to learn the steps involved in seeking court approval for changes to a trust.
Clients turn to our firm because we provide thorough legal review and personalized attention to trust matters affecting families in Loma Rica and across California. We take time to understand the trust instrument, relevant facts, and the interests of all parties to craft a petition that clearly presents the legal and factual basis for modification. Our team prepares the necessary paperwork, coordinates notifications to interested parties, and represents clients in hearings when required. We work to obtain orderly, enforceable results that help preserve estate planning objectives.
Our approach emphasizes practical solutions that balance legal protections with cost considerations. We discuss alternatives, such as amendments or negotiated resolutions, and explain the benefits and trade-offs of pursuing formal court action. When a petition is necessary, we focus on assembling persuasive evidence, anticipating potential objections, and seeking an efficient resolution. The goal is to protect trustee and beneficiary interests while securing a clear and manageable trust administration moving forward.
We also work closely with clients to coordinate estate planning documents beyond the trust, including pour-over wills, powers of attorney, advance health care directives, and trust certifications, ensuring that any trust modifications are consistent with the broader plan. Attention to these related instruments reduces the likelihood of unintended gaps in the estate plan. For personalized guidance and to discuss next steps, contact our office in San Jose at 408-528-2827 to schedule an initial consultation regarding trust modifications and related estate planning matters.
Our process begins with a careful review of the trust document and associated records to identify the legal basis for modification and any potential complications. We gather evidence such as deeds, account statements, correspondence, and prior drafts to support a petition. After consulting with you about goals and alternatives, we prepare the petition and required notices, file with the appropriate probate court, and serve interested parties. If objections arise, we pursue negotiation or present the matter at a hearing to seek a favorable order. Throughout the process we keep clients informed about strategy and timelines.
The initial phase focuses on reviewing the trust, related estate documents, and factual circumstances to evaluate options. We assess whether informal amendments are possible, whether beneficiary consents can be obtained, or whether a judicial petition is necessary. This stage includes identifying assets and confirming whether the trust is properly funded. Clear strategy at the outset helps determine the most effective approach while minimizing expense. A well-planned petition increases the likelihood of a smooth court process and a durable outcome.
Examining the trust instrument and any prior amendments, wills, and funding documents is essential to understanding the legal framework and the settlor’s intent. We look for language addressing amendment, trustee powers, and distribution provisions, as well as any ambiguities or inconsistencies that could require correction. Collecting supporting records such as account statements, deeds, and correspondence helps establish factual grounds for a petition. This comprehensive review forms the foundation for a persuasive filing and a clear legal strategy.
Based on the document review, we develop a legal strategy that weighs the pros and cons of informal changes, beneficiary agreements, or a court petition. This plan addresses notice requirements, potential objections, and the evidence needed to support the requested modification. Identifying likely issues early allows us to prepare persuasive declarations and propose solutions that limit conflict. The tactical plan also sets expectations for timelines and costs so clients can make informed decisions about how to proceed.
Once the petition is prepared, it is filed with the appropriate probate court and served on beneficiaries and other interested parties in accordance with statutory rules. Proper service ensures that interested parties have an opportunity to respond and that the court has jurisdiction to rule. The filing typically includes the proposed order and supporting declarations that explain why the modification is justified. Effective presentation at this stage increases the likelihood of a favorable outcome, whether through agreement or court decision.
Drafting a petition requires clear articulation of the requested relief, excerpts from relevant trust provisions, and factual declarations that demonstrate the need for modification. Supporting exhibits such as deeds, account statements, and prior drafts can be attached to substantiate claims. Preparing a proposed order that implements the requested changes helps the court and stakeholders understand the intended outcome. Thorough preparation reduces the chance of delays or requests for supplemental information from the court.
Following statutory service procedures is critical to preserve the petition’s validity and ensure all interested parties receive notice. After service, beneficiaries may consent, remain silent, or file objections. We review any responses and pursue negotiation when possible to reach a stipulated resolution. If objections persist, we prepare for a hearing by organizing evidence and witness declarations to present a persuasive case to the court. Handling responses promptly and thoroughly keeps the matter moving forward and protects client interests.
If the matter proceeds to a hearing, the court will evaluate the legal and factual record and hear argument from the parties. The judge may grant the petition, deny it, or grant a narrower form of relief. Once the court issues an order, the trust may be modified as directed, and trustees can act in accordance with the new terms. Obtaining a clear, enforceable order resolves ambiguity and helps ensure consistent trust administration after the change. We assist clients in implementing court orders and updating trust records accordingly.
Preparing for a hearing involves finalizing declarations, organizing exhibits, and anticipating potential objections so we can present a concise and persuasive argument to the court. Witness declarations or documentary evidence that demonstrate the settlor’s intent and the need for modification are often central to the hearing. Clear presentation of facts and proposed orders assists the judge in understanding the requested relief and its legal basis, which improves the chances of securing an order consistent with the client’s objectives.
After the court issues an order modifying the trust, we assist with implementing the changes by preparing updated trust records, advising trustees on any new duties, and coordinating transfers to align with the modified terms. If the modification affects related documents such as wills or powers of attorney, we can help update those documents to maintain consistency across the estate plan. Ensuring proper follow-through helps protect trust administration and reduces the likelihood of future disputes.
A trust modification petition is a formal request filed in probate court asking a judge to approve changes to an existing trust or to resolve issues that prevent proper administration. Reasons to file include correcting drafting mistakes, addressing unfunded assets, clarifying ambiguous terms, or adjusting provisions to reflect changed circumstances. The petition sets out the facts supporting the change and the legal basis for court intervention and typically includes supporting documents and declarations to substantiate the request. The petition process provides a binding judicial resolution that helps prevent further disputes and clarifies trustee duties and beneficiary rights. Interested parties must be properly notified and may file responses or objections. The court evaluates whether the requested modification aligns with legal standards and the settlor’s intent before issuing an order. Seeking clear documentation and legal guidance beforehand improves the chances of a favorable outcome and reduces the risk of contested proceedings.
The time to resolve a trust modification petition varies depending on factors such as the complexity of the issues, the need for additional evidence, and whether interested parties object. If all parties consent and documentation is complete, a petition may be resolved relatively quickly, sometimes in a matter of weeks or a few months. When disputes arise or the court requires supplemental filings and evidentiary hearings, the process can extend to several months or longer. Timelines also depend on the probate court’s calendar and workload. Starting with a thorough document review and proactive communication with beneficiaries helps streamline the process. Preparing persuasive declarations and organizing exhibits in advance reduces the likelihood of delays caused by requests for additional information. If objections occur, exploring negotiated resolutions can shorten the timeline compared with lengthy contested hearings. Clear expectations about timeframes and possible outcomes are important for planning and decision making.
Yes, a trust can sometimes be modified after the settlor has died through a court petition when circumstances or errors make modification appropriate under state law. Post-death modifications typically require demonstrating that the change reflects the settlor’s intent or corrects mistakes that would otherwise frustrate the purpose of the trust. Courts carefully consider the settlor’s original intentions and available evidence, such as prior drafts, correspondence, or contemporaneous documents that illuminate what the settlor intended. Modifications after death are more likely when the requested change resolves ambiguities, corrects drafting errors, or addresses assets that were intended to be in the trust but were not properly transferred. Interested parties will receive notice and have the opportunity to object. A judicial order provides a legally enforceable modification that clarifies administration for trustees and beneficiaries alike.
A Heggstad petition seeks recognition that assets belonged to a trust even though formal transfer steps were not completed. Successful petitions typically rely on documentation showing the settlor intended the assets to be trust property, such as beneficiary designations, account files, correspondence, or evidence of transfer attempts. Declarations describing the settlor’s actions and intent, along with supporting exhibits like deeds or statements, are often central to the petition. The court examines the totality of the evidence to determine whether the assets should be treated as trust property rather than subject to probate. Clear records and credible testimony demonstrating the settlor’s intent and efforts to fund the trust increase the likelihood of a favorable ruling. Preparing a Heggstad petition with thorough documentation helps present a persuasive case to the court.
Yes, beneficiaries and other interested parties must typically be notified when a petition to modify a trust is filed so they have an opportunity to participate in the proceedings. Proper service is required by statute to ensure the court has jurisdiction and to provide transparency in matters that affect distribution rights or trustee powers. Notification gives beneficiaries the chance to consent, remain neutral, or file objections to the proposed modification. If a beneficiary objects, the court will consider the objection as part of its review and may schedule a hearing to resolve contested issues. When parties agree to a modification in writing, they can often present a stipulated order to the court, which may simplify the process and reduce costs. Timely and accurate notice is essential to avoid procedural challenges that could affect the petition’s validity.
A trust amendment is typically an instrument executed by the settlor while they retain the authority to change the trust, and it can often be completed without court involvement if the trust language permits. Amendments are appropriate when the settlor is alive and has retained the power to alter terms, making the process quicker and more private. These changes are effective as long as they follow the trust’s required formalities and do not infringe on existing rights that cannot be altered informally. Court-ordered modifications, by contrast, are sought through a petition when informal amendment is not possible due to disputes, the settlor’s incapacity or death, or when legal errors or funding issues exist. A court order provides authoritative resolution and helps ensure enforceability, especially where beneficiary rights or third-party interests are implicated. The decision between amendment and petition depends on circumstances, consent, and the trust’s terms.
A court can reform a trust to reflect the settlor’s true intent when there is clear and convincing evidence that the written document does not reflect what the settlor intended due to mistake or drafting error. Reformation requires presenting contemporaneous evidence such as drafts, correspondence, or testimony that supports the claim about the settlor’s intended terms. The petition should show that the requested change accurately captures the intent and corrects the mistake without creating new injustices for beneficiaries. Because reformation alters the written terms of the trust, courts are cautious and require strong supporting proof. When the evidence convincingly demonstrates that the document fails to express the settlor’s intended provisions, reformation can align the trust with that intent and produce an enforceable result that guides trustee actions and beneficiary distributions.
If beneficiaries object to a proposed modification, the court will consider their objections as part of the petition proceedings, which may lead to negotiation, mediation, or a contested hearing. Objections can raise factual disputes about intent, claims of prejudice, or questions about the legal basis for the requested change. Responding effectively to objections typically involves presenting supporting declarations, exhibits, and legal arguments to demonstrate that the modification is appropriate and lawful. Engaging in early communication and exploring settlement options can reduce the need for a contested hearing. If resolution is not possible, the matter proceeds through the court process where the judge evaluates the merits of the petition and the objections. A well-prepared petition that anticipates common objections increases the likelihood of a favorable court decision.
Trust modification petitions can have tax implications depending on the nature of the change and the type of trust involved. Modifying distribution terms, beneficiary designations, or trustee powers may affect estate, gift, or income tax consequences in certain circumstances. It is important to consider potential tax impacts before pursuing significant modifications to ensure the change does not produce unintended tax liabilities or alter tax planning strategies embedded in the original trust structure. Consulting with tax advisors in conjunction with legal counsel can help evaluate how a proposed modification may affect tax treatment. Coordinating legal and financial advice ensures the modification achieves the settlor’s objectives while managing tax consequences effectively. Incorporating tax considerations into the petition strategy helps protect the overall estate plan.
Costs for filing a trust modification petition vary based on factors such as the petition’s complexity, the amount of document preparation required, whether interested parties consent, and the need for hearings. Routine petitions with consenting parties and straightforward documentation will generally be less expensive than contested matters that require extensive evidence and courtroom time. Court filing fees and service costs also contribute to total expenses. A candid discussion about costs and fee structures helps clients plan and set expectations. We strive to provide clear estimates based on the facts of each matter and consider alternatives to reduce expense when appropriate, such as negotiating agreements or preparing stipulated orders. Transparent communication about anticipated costs and potential additional expenses allows clients to make informed decisions about pursuing a petition and to balance the benefits of court resolution against the associated costs.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas