A Heggstad petition can be an essential tool when trust administration encounters issues after a settlor’s incapacity or death. At the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman we assist clients from Plumas Lake and Yuba County with clear guidance about whether a Heggstad petition is appropriate in their matter. This overview explains what a Heggstad petition generally does, how it can streamline transfer of assets to a trust, and what courts look for when deciding whether to grant relief. Our goal is to present the information you need to make informed decisions about moving property into a trust when formalities were not completed during the settlor’s lifetime.
Many families face delays and uncertainty when assets intended for a trust remain titled outside the trust. A Heggstad petition asks the court to recognize that certain transfers were intended to place property in trust despite incomplete formalities. This page outlines the process, practical considerations, and typical documentation that supports a petition in California. We also explain the potential outcomes and how attorneys may work with fiduciaries and beneficiaries to resolve disputes. The objective is to reduce delay and minimize conflict so assets pass as the settlor intended while complying with California probate and trust administration rules.
Filing a Heggstad petition can bring clarity and finality to trust administration when transfer formalities were not completed. It can avoid a full probate administration by asking the court to treat particular assets as already belonging to the trust, which helps beneficiaries receive distributions more quickly and reduces administrative costs. Beyond speed and cost savings, a successful petition helps carry out the settlor’s estate planning intentions and limits family conflict by providing a legal pathway for recognition of trust property. The petition process also creates a defined record that can prevent later challenges and support orderly management of the estate consistent with California trust law.
The Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman provide estate planning and trust administration services from our San Jose base, serving clients across Yuba County including Plumas Lake. We focus on practical, client-centered representation for matters such as Heggstad petitions, trust modifications, and related probate actions. When a client presents a potential Heggstad issue, we evaluate documentary evidence, speak with fiduciaries and beneficiaries, and develop a strategy aimed at resolving title defects while protecting client interests. Our communication emphasizes transparency, realistic expectations, and steady guidance throughout the court process, ensuring clients understand each step and associated timelines.
A Heggstad petition asks the probate court to recognize that certain property should be considered part of a trust even though the formal transfer steps were not completed properly. Typically this arises when a settlor intended to fund a trust by transferring title or executing documents, but there remains documentation or record-title obstacles. The petition seeks judicial confirmation that the settlor’s intent was to place property in trust, and that recognizing that intent serves the settlor’s estate plan. Filing such a petition begins a court process that may involve notice to interested parties, evidentiary submissions, and a hearing to determine whether the court should grant the requested relief.
Successful petitions often rely on a combination of signed documents, witness testimony, contemporaneous records, and consistent estate planning documents showing intent to fund the trust. The court evaluates whether the settlor intended to transfer the property and whether recognizing the transfer is equitable and consistent with state law. The outcome can permit transfer of title without full probate, enabling trustees to manage and distribute trust property more efficiently. However, the process may also prompt objections from parties who dispute the settlor’s intent or the propriety of the transfer, so careful preparation and persuasive documentation are important elements of a strong filing strategy.
A Heggstad petition is a legal mechanism in California used to correct or recognize property transfers to a trust that were intended but not fully effected. The petition essentially asks the court to find that specific property already belonged to the trust at the settlor’s death or incapacity, despite title being in another name or missing certain forms. The remedy enables trustees to confirm ownership and proceed with trust administration. While the petition does not create an estate plan, it enforces the plan the settlor had in mind, balancing the settlor’s intent with statutory requirements to ensure that distributions align with the trust’s terms.
Preparing a Heggstad petition requires assembling evidence showing the settlor’s intent, which can include the trust instrument, draft documents, related correspondence, beneficiary statements, and records of conducted but incomplete transfers. The petition will identify the asset in question, explain the transfer history, and request judicial recognition that the asset belongs to the trust. Procedural steps include serving notice to interested parties, filing supporting declarations and exhibits, and attending a court hearing where evidence is presented. The court then determines whether to grant relief based on intent, fairness, and applicable law, which can resolve title issues without a full probate administration.
Understanding common terms helps demystify the process of filing a Heggstad petition. Familiarity with words like settlor, trustee, beneficiary, title, intestacy, and pour-over will clarifies roles and outcomes when property needs judicial recognition as trust assets. These definitions assist clients and family members in following the petition, knowing who must be notified, and recognizing possible objections. Clear explanations reduce confusion during court filings and hearings and enable parties to participate meaningfully in resolution. Below are concise definitions intended to give readers a quick reference to the central concepts that arise in Heggstad matters.
Settlor refers to the person who created the trust and whose assets were intended to fund it. In Heggstad matters the settlor’s actions, written intentions, and communications are central to proving whether a particular asset should be treated as trust property. Evidence about the settlor’s capacity and contemporaneous statements can influence the court’s decision. The settlor’s original trust documents and related estate planning paperwork provide context for interpreting intentions and resolving defects in transfer formalities. Courts focus on the settlor’s documented plan and actions to determine whether the property was effectively intended to be in the trust.
Trustee denotes the individual or entity appointed to manage trust assets according to the trust instrument. When a Heggstad petition is filed, a trustee may seek court recognition that certain assets belong to the trust so the trustee can administer and distribute those assets under the trust terms. The trustee has fiduciary duties to beneficiaries, including acting in their best interests and providing transparent accounting once assets are recognized as trust property. The trustee’s declarations and records are often critical pieces of evidence presented with the petition to demonstrate how property was handled and the intent behind transfers.
Beneficiary means a person or entity entitled to benefits under the trust terms. Beneficiaries are generally interested parties in a Heggstad proceeding because the outcome affects their inheritance and timing of distributions. Beneficiaries may support a petition to expedite access to trust assets, or they may oppose a petition if they believe the transfer undermines the settlor’s intent or their rights. Petitions require notice to beneficiaries, giving them opportunity to review the record, submit declarations, and present objections to the court, which then weighs competing evidence and interest considerations in reaching its decision.
A pour-over will is a testamentary document designed to transfer any property not already in the trust into the trust at the settlor’s death. In Heggstad matters a pour-over will can support the argument that the settlor intended the trust to receive property, and it may be used as corroborating evidence of intent when formal trust funding did not occur. While a pour-over will usually requires probate to transfer assets, a Heggstad petition seeks court recognition that a specific asset should be treated as already in the trust, potentially minimizing the need for probate and aligning distributions with the broader estate plan.
When assets remain outside a trust, heirs and fiduciaries face several routes such as probate, a transfer on death arrangement, or a Heggstad petition. Probate involves a formal court estate administration that can be time-consuming and costly, while a Heggstad petition seeks judicial recognition that assets belong to the trust and thus may avoid full probate. Other alternatives include negotiated transfer agreements among beneficiaries or corrective deeds when possible. Each option carries trade-offs in speed, cost, and risk of dispute, so selecting the right path often depends on the nature of the assets, the clarity of the settlor’s documentation, and the willingness of interested parties to cooperate.
A limited approach may succeed when there is strong, contemporaneous documentation showing the settlor clearly intended the asset to belong to the trust. Signed drafts, correspondence with advisers, trust schedules, and financial account instructions can together form a convincing record that the property was meant to be trust property. If beneficiaries and the trustee agree, these documents may permit corrective steps without formal litigation. Taking an informal route can reduce delay and expense, provided all interested parties consent and the record leaves little doubt about the settlor’s intentions and the proper disposition of the asset.
When beneficiaries, trustees, and title-holders cooperate, an informal transfer or a short declaratory filing can often resolve the issue efficiently. Agreement among parties reduces the likelihood of contested litigation and can allow corrective deeds, account retitling, or stipulated court orders to move property into the trust quickly. Cooperation helps limit fees and prevents extended delay in distribution. However, even where parties appear willing, it is important to document the agreement carefully and confirm that the proposed solution complies with California law to avoid later disputes or challenges to the transfer.
A comprehensive approach is advisable when title to property is complex or when beneficiaries or creditors may dispute the transfer. Real estate with encumbrances, retirement accounts with beneficiary designations, or assets held jointly with rights of survivorship can raise technical issues that require careful legal analysis. When claims are contested, a full court proceeding such as a Heggstad petition may be necessary to clear title and provide a definitive resolution. Comprehensive representation ensures evidence is gathered and presented effectively, reducing the chance of later litigation or uncertainty about asset ownership.
Where substantial assets or sensitive family dynamics are involved, pursuing a thorough legal strategy is often prudent. High-value property or multiple interested beneficiaries increases the stakes and the potential for disputes. A comprehensive approach includes careful review of documents, robust notice and service to interested parties, and well-organized filings that anticipate likely objections. This level of preparation can reduce post-judgment challenges and offers a clearer path for trustees to administer the estate. Addressing potential complications early helps preserve value and honors the settlor’s stated intentions in an enduring way.
A comprehensive Heggstad petition typically yields clearer, more enforceable outcomes that benefit both trustees and beneficiaries. Thorough preparation improves the likelihood the court will accept the settlor’s intent as shown by the record, minimizes the risk of later challenges, and establishes a defendable title for trustees to manage assets. This approach also helps ensure required notices are properly served and that procedural deadlines are met. While more detailed preparation may involve greater upfront work, it often reduces the total time and expense by preventing contested litigation or successive filings.
In addition to legal certainty, a fully prepared court petition can provide peace of mind for family members by formalizing the transfer and explaining the basis for the court’s order. The resulting judgment or order becomes a clear public record of ownership that can be relied upon by financial institutions, title companies, and successor trustees. That certainty reduces administrative friction when selling property, updating account ownership, or distributing assets, and it supports smoother trust administration going forward by establishing a firm legal foundation for trustee actions.
A full and persuasive petition increases the chances of obtaining a judicial declaration that corrects title defects and thereby enables trustees to manage or sell assets without further delay. Clear title simplifies transactions with banks, title companies, and other institutions, which often require a court order or definitive documentation before accepting trust ownership. By resolving ambiguities through court action, trustees reduce the administrative steps needed to distribute assets under the trust and can avoid piecemeal challenges that prolong administration and increase costs for beneficiaries.
Thorough preparation and documentation reduce the likelihood that parties will challenge the court’s recognition of trust ownership in the future. When the record the court relies on is complete, clear, and well-supported, the resulting order is more defensible against subsequent attacks. This stability benefits trustees and beneficiaries alike by decreasing the chance of renewed litigation, preserving estate assets, and conserving resources that might otherwise be consumed by disputes. A carefully managed filing process therefore contributes to long-term resolution and predictability in trust administration.
Collecting trust instruments, draft deeds, financial account records, correspondence with advisers, and any documents reflecting the settlor’s intent is vital. Early assembly of these records helps attorneys evaluate the strength of a petition and identify missing pieces that may be obtained through subpoenas or third-party requests. Organized documentation accelerates the drafting of declarations and exhibits for court filings and permits more accurate identification of interested parties who must be notified. The more complete the record, the clearer the case for judicial recognition of trust ownership, which often shortens the court process.
When pursuing a Heggstad petition, it is important to evaluate the asset in the context of the overall estate plan, including pour-over wills, beneficiary designations, and other planning documents. Aligning the petition with the settlor’s documented intentions and the trustee’s duties ensures that any court order supports consistent administration. This holistic view helps avoid piecemeal solutions that may create conflicts with other parts of the plan and promotes lasting resolution. Advisors should review all related instruments to anticipate effects on distribution and creditor claims before finalizing a petition.
Consider a Heggstad petition when property intended for a trust is still titled in a different name due to incomplete transfers, missing signatures, or administrative oversights. If the settlor made clear arrangements that were not finalized, a petition can clarify ownership and help avoid probate for that property. It is particularly relevant when the asset is difficult or costly to probate, such as real estate, or when timely access to funds is needed for estate expenses or distributions. The decision should follow a careful review of documents and consultation about likely outcomes and costs.
Another reason to pursue a petition is when there is a reasonable chance of family disagreement that could impede administration. A court order recognizing the asset as trust property can reduce future disputes and create a formal record that institutions will accept. Additionally, if delay from probate would impose financial hardship or disrupt planned distributions to beneficiaries or dependent family members, a Heggstad petition can be a useful route. The approach is designed to honor the settlor’s intent while providing legally enforceable clarity for trustees and beneficiaries.
Common scenarios include real estate that was intended to be deeded into the trust but remained in the settlor’s name, bank or investment accounts not retitled, and retirement accounts lacking updated beneficiary designations consistent with the trust. Other situations involve missing signatures on trust funding documents or administrative errors by attorneys or financial institutions. These circumstances can leave property in legal limbo and prompt beneficiaries or trustees to seek judicial recognition to permit trust administration to proceed as the settlor intended. Each case requires tailored analysis of documentation and potential remedies under California law.
Real estate often triggers Heggstad petitions when a deed was prepared but not recorded or when title remains solely in the settlor’s name. Because real property typically requires a court or title company to accept a change in ownership documentation, judicial recognition may be needed to let trustees sell or transfer the property under the trust terms. Evidence such as draft deeds, signing records, or correspondence regarding the intended transfer can help convince the court that the settlor’s intent was to fund the trust and that recognizing this intent by order is appropriate.
Financial accounts that were intended to be retitled in the name of the trust but remain in the settlor’s name can complicate administration. Institutions often require a court order to change ownership records, especially when records are inconsistent or incomplete. A Heggstad petition can ask the court to declare those accounts trust property so the trustee can manage or distribute the funds. Account statements, trustee instructions, and communications with financial institutions are typical supporting evidence to show the settlor intended the trust to receive the accounts.
Occasions arise where a settlor executed a trust but left other documents unfinished or misfiled, such as missing notary acknowledgements or unsigned transfer forms. These gaps can prevent institutions from recognizing trust ownership without judicial intervention. A Heggstad petition addresses those gaps by presenting the court with the complete context of the settlor’s planning activity and requesting an order that treats the asset as part of the trust. Properly reconciling the available documents and producing compelling declarations is key to obtaining a favorable ruling.
Although based in San Jose, the Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves clients throughout California, including Plumas Lake and Yuba County, with estate planning and trust administration matters. We understand regional court practices and aim to provide attentive representation whether a petition requires local filings or coordination with counsel near Plumas Lake. Clients can expect clear communication about process, scheduling, and likely timeframes for court hearings. Contact information, including our phone number 408-528-2827, is provided for prompt initial consultation to discuss the specifics of a Heggstad matter and potential next steps.
Selecting a law firm to handle a petition to recognize trust property is an important decision because the firm’s approach affects timing, clarity of documentation, and the likelihood of a smooth court process. Our practice focuses on careful evidence gathering, strategic filing, and clear communication with trustees and beneficiaries. We work to present a persuasive factual narrative and supporting exhibits so the court can efficiently resolve title questions. Our representation seeks to minimize conflict, reduce delays, and achieve an order that allows trustees to administer assets consistent with the settlor’s documented plan.
We assist clients in preparing the necessary filings, serving required notices, and coordinating with financial institutions and title companies to implement the court’s order after it is entered. When disputes arise, we strive to resolve them through negotiated agreement where possible while remaining prepared to litigate contested issues when necessary. Throughout the process our objective is to provide practical pathways for trustees and beneficiaries to move forward with administration and distribution, respecting both legal requirements and family concerns that often accompany estate matters.
Clients receive personal attention to case details, including review of trust instruments such as revocable living trusts, pour-over wills, and related documents like powers of attorney and HIPAA authorizations. This holistic review helps ensure a petition aligns with the settlor’s broader plan and that subsequent trustee actions comply with court orders and statutory obligations. We also discuss realistic timeframes and cost considerations so clients understand procedural steps and potential outcomes before proceeding with a formal filing.
Our process begins with a detailed review of your documents and circumstances to determine whether a Heggstad petition is the appropriate route. We gather evidence, identify interested parties, and prepare comprehensive court filings that include declarations, exhibits, and proposed orders. We handle service of process and monitor any responses, working to resolve issues through negotiated stipulations where possible. If a hearing is required, we present the evidence and arguments to the court and assist with implementing the resulting order. Throughout the case we maintain consistent communication regarding progress and next steps.
The first stage focuses on understanding the settlor’s plan and locating all documents that reflect intent to fund the trust. We request trust instruments, draft transactions, bank and title records, and any correspondence with attorneys or financial institutions. Our review identifies gaps and potential objections so we can develop a plan to fill evidentiary holes. We also identify the parties who must be provided notice and estimate likely timelines and costs. This groundwork is critical to preparing a persuasive petition and minimizing the need for follow-up filings.
At this step, we analyze all available documents to determine their probative value and identify additional records needed to establish the settlor’s intent. Deeds, account statements, trust schedules, and signed drafts are evaluated alongside correspondence that may corroborate the intent to fund the trust. We may obtain sworn declarations from witnesses or former advisers whose testimony supports the petition. A thorough evidence assessment informs the drafting strategy and helps frame the factual narrative for the court, increasing the petition’s prospects for success.
We compile a list of beneficiaries, heirs, and other interested parties who must be notified under California probate rules. Proper notice is essential to avoid future jurisdictional challenges and to provide parties an opportunity to object or support the petition. We also determine whether any creditors or lienholders need to be served and assess whether additional procedural steps, such as publication, are necessary. Compliance with notice requirements strengthens the petition’s legitimacy and helps move the case toward a timely hearing and resolution.
After evidence collection and notice preparation, we draft the petition and all supporting declarations and exhibits for filing with the probate court. Documents are organized to present a clear factual narrative explaining why the court should recognize the asset as trust property. We propose an order for the court’s consideration that details the requested relief and post-order steps for implementing title changes. Filing initiates the formal process and triggers deadlines for responses, so accuracy and completeness at this stage are important to avoid continuances or repeated filings.
Drafting supporting declarations involves transforming the factual record into persuasive courtroom evidence. Trustee and witness declarations should describe relevant dealings, signed documents, and contemporaneous statements of the settlor. Exhibits such as drafts of deeds, account change forms, and email correspondence are labeled and indexed to correspond with declarations. Clear exhibit presentation helps the court assess the weight of the evidence and expedites resolution. Well-prepared filings reduce the likelihood of discovery disputes and make hearings more efficient for all parties involved.
Once the petition and exhibits are complete, we file the materials with the appropriate probate court and ensure all interested parties receive proper service. Serving parties includes delivering copies of the petition, notices, and any proposed orders in the manner required by law. Timely and correct service preserves the court’s jurisdiction and allows the process to proceed on schedule. We monitor responses and coordinate any necessary follow-up filings to address procedural issues or objections that may arise after initial service.
If parties do not resolve issues by agreement, the court will schedule a hearing where the petition’s factual record and legal arguments are presented. At the hearing, the court evaluates evidence and hears any objections before deciding whether to enter an order recognizing the property as trust assets. If the court grants the petition, the resulting order is used to work with title companies and financial institutions to implement changes in ownership and enable trustee administration. Post-order steps often include filing the order with county records and updating account registrations.
At the hearing, counsel presents declarations and documentary evidence to the judge and responds to questions or objections raised by other parties. Clear, organized presentation of the facts and a concise explanation of why the order requested reflects the settlor’s intent help the court reach a decision. Counsel may also propose stipulated orders when parties agree, which can streamline the process and avoid extended litigation. Preparation for the hearing includes anticipating likely challenges and ensuring all exhibits and witness declarations are admissible and readily available for the court’s review.
Once an order is entered, we assist trustees in implementing the court’s directives, which may include recording deeds, presenting orders to banks and brokerages, and updating trust inventories. Financial institutions and title companies often require certified copies of court orders to change ownership records. Ensuring the proper follow-through prevents future title disputes and allows trustees to proceed with asset management and distribution under the trust terms. We also advise on any follow-up notices or filings required to complete the administrative tasks following entry of the court’s order.
A Heggstad petition is a legal request to the probate court asking it to recognize that specific property should be treated as belonging to a trust despite incomplete transfer formalities. It is often used when a settlor intended to fund a trust but assets remain titled outside it due to oversight, missing signatures, or administrative error. The petition presents documentary evidence and declarations to demonstrate the settlor’s intent and asks the court to enter an order reflecting that the asset belonged to the trust at the relevant time. Filing such a petition can help avoid the need for a full probate for those specific assets and allows trustees to manage or distribute them under the trust terms. The petition requires notice to interested parties and may proceed to hearing if objections are filed. Courts weigh the totality of evidence about intent, fairness, and statutory rules when deciding whether to grant the requested relief.
A Heggstad petition is narrower than a full probate administration because it seeks judicial recognition that particular assets belong to a trust rather than opening a complete probate estate for all assets. Probate is a broader court process to administer an estate under a will, settle debts, and distribute assets under court supervision. By contrast, a Heggstad petition aims to expedite trust administration for assets that were intended to be in the trust and thus may avoid lengthy probate procedures for those items. However, a petition will not resolve all issues that a full probate could address, such as creditor claims against the estate or distribution of non-trust property. If other estate issues exist, trustees and beneficiaries should consider how a petition fits into the overall plan and whether additional proceedings are necessary to address remaining assets or claims.
Supportive evidence for a Heggstad petition typically includes the trust instrument, draft or executed deeds, account change forms, trustee schedules, and correspondence indicating the settlor’s intent to fund the trust. Witness declarations from attorneys, trustees, or family members who observed the settlor’s actions can corroborate the documentary record. Together these materials help the court determine whether the settlor intended the asset to be trust property despite incomplete formalities. The strength of evidence varies case by case, and courts look for a consistent narrative rather than isolated documents. Organizing exhibits clearly and providing persuasive declarations helps the court evaluate intent and may increase the chance of obtaining an order recognizing the property as part of the trust.
Interested parties commonly include beneficiaries named in the trust, heirs who would inherit under intestacy, trustees, and known creditors. Proper notice is required under California probate rules so affected parties have an opportunity to object or support the petition. The exact list of required recipients depends on who has a legal interest in the asset and the trust, and the court requires proof of service to confirm notice was provided. Failing to provide appropriate notice can lead to jurisdictional challenges and undermine the court’s authority to enter an order. For that reason, careful identification and service of interested parties are crucial steps in the filing process, and they are handled according to statutory procedures to preserve the integrity of the petition.
Financial institutions and title companies will often accept a court order that recognizes property as trust assets, but each institution has its own requirements for documentation and may request certified copies of the order or additional certifications. Banks and brokerages generally require clear proof of the trustee’s authority and a finalized court order before retitling accounts. Title companies similarly require recorded orders or deeds to change real estate ownership. Coordination with these institutions is an important part of implementing the court’s order. Preparing the documents they require in advance and presenting the certified order expedites the process of retitling and reduces friction when transferring or selling assets following the court’s recognition.
The timeline for a Heggstad petition varies depending on the complexity of the matter, the volume of evidence, court availability, and whether objections are filed. An uncontested petition where parties agree can proceed more quickly, sometimes within a few months, while contested matters may take longer because of discovery, hearings, and continuances. The early stages of evidence collection and notice can also add time if third-party records are needed. Proactive case management and thorough preparation can shorten the process by minimizing continuances and avoiding surprise objections. Discussing realistic timeframes with counsel and completing document collection early helps set expectations and move the matter toward timely resolution.
A petition may be denied if the court finds insufficient evidence that the settlor intended the property to be part of the trust, or if procedural defects, such as improper notice, compromise the court’s authority. Discrepancies among documents, contradictory witness statements, or credible objections from interested parties can weaken a petition’s chances. The court also considers whether recognizing the transfer would be inequitable or conflict with statutory requirements. If a petition faces denial, alternative routes may include pursuing probate for affected assets or negotiating settlements among parties. Careful preparation and identification of potential weaknesses before filing can reduce the risk of denial and provide a plan for addressing anticipated objections.
Yes, beneficiaries and other interested parties may contest a Heggstad petition by filing objections within the time allowed under probate rules. Contests typically argue that the evidence does not support recognition of the asset as trust property or that the settlor lacked capacity or was subject to undue influence. When objections are raised, the court will evaluate competing evidence and may hold a contested hearing to resolve factual disputes. Because contests can prolong the process and increase costs, parties sometimes negotiate settlements or stipulated orders that achieve a mutually acceptable resolution. Counsel can assist clients in evaluating the strength of objections and pursuing options that protect their interests while working toward an efficient outcome.
A Heggstad petition may avoid probate for the particular assets subject to the petition by obtaining a court order that recognizes them as trust property, but it does not automatically avoid probate for other non-trust assets. If additional assets are outside the trust or if there are separate creditor claims and estate issues, those matters may still require probate proceedings. The petition is a targeted remedy intended to clear title on specific items rather than a blanket substitute for full estate administration. Assessing whether a petition will reduce or eliminate the need for probate overall requires a review of the entire estate and how assets are titled. Counsel can advise whether a series of petitions or other legal steps might limit probate exposure for an estate as a whole.
The cost of filing a Heggstad petition varies with the complexity of the facts, the amount of evidence required, and whether the matter is contested. Uncontested petitions typically involve fees for document preparation, court filing fees, and minimal hearing time, while contested matters can accrue additional litigation costs for discovery, depositions, and extended court appearances. Geographic factors and the need to coordinate with multiple institutions may also affect total fees. During an initial consultation we provide a realistic estimate based on case specifics, anticipated time for document collection, and likely interactions with other parties. A transparent cost discussion early on helps clients plan and weigh the benefits of pursuing a petition versus alternative remedies in their particular situation.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas