A Heggstad petition helps transfer title to property into a trust when a decedent signed a trust but did not complete every required transfer step before passing away. In Wheatland and throughout Yuba County, families often face confusion over whether real property automatically belongs to a trust after the trustmaker’s death. This article explains the purpose of a Heggstad petition, how it may protect beneficiaries’ rights, and what local courts typically consider. We describe how careful review of trust documents, deeds, and estate planning records can clarify ownership and reduce the risk of litigation or delays in administering the estate.
When an individual executed a trust but assets were not formally transferred into it, a Heggstad petition can be an efficient legal mechanism to reflect the trustmaker’s intent and finish the estate plan. For Wheatland property owners and beneficiaries, this process often starts with a detailed inventory of deeds, beneficiary designations, and trust language. The petition requests a court order declaring that the decedent intended the property to be held by the trust, and asks the court to direct county records to recognize the trust as owner. Timely action can prevent clouds on title and simplify later uses of the property.
A Heggstad petition can provide legal clarity and documentation when a decedent clearly intended to fund a trust but administrative steps were incomplete. Benefits include obtaining a recorded order that removes uncertainty about title, enabling beneficiaries to sell or refinance property, and avoiding prolonged disputes. In many situations, a recorded court order resolving ownership reduces resistance from title companies and lenders. For families in Wheatland, resolving these issues promptly helps preserve estate value, avoid unnecessary court battles, and allow trustees and beneficiaries to focus on carrying out the trustmaker’s intentions efficiently and with greater certainty.
Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman serves California clients focusing on estate planning matters, wills, trusts, and trust administration. Our approach emphasizes careful document review and clear communication to achieve results that respect the client’s wishes and local legal requirements. For Heggstad petitions, we examine trust documents, deeds, and surrounding facts to build a persuasive record demonstrating the decedent’s intent to place property in the trust. We work with clients in Wheatland and beyond to prepare court filings, coordinate with title companies, and guide trustees and beneficiaries through practical steps needed to clear title and administer the estate responsibly.
A Heggstad petition is a legal request to a California court to recognize that property should be treated as owned by a trust when the trust instrument indicates an intent to transfer but formal transfer steps were not completed. Courts evaluate the trust document, related writings, and actions taken by the trustmaker to determine whether title should be corrected. The process involves assembling evidence, drafting a petition that explains the factual and legal basis for relief, and pursuing a court order that can be recorded to clear title. This remedy helps enforce testamentary intent without the need for full probate in many cases.
The success of a Heggstad petition often depends on clear proof of the trustmaker’s intent and consistent actions that point to the trust as the intended owner. Deeds, beneficiary statements, draft transfers, and contemporaneous correspondence can support a petition. The court reviews whether evidence establishes that the property was meant to be in the trust and whether equitable relief is appropriate. For trustees and beneficiaries, understanding the evidentiary requirements and the local court’s procedures helps set realistic expectations for timeline and outcome, and supports preparation of a well-founded petition that will be accepted by the recorder’s office.
A Heggstad petition seeks a judicial declaration that specific property should be treated as if it had been formally conveyed to a trust during the trustmaker’s lifetime. The petition typically requests that the court issue an order directing the county recorder to accept trust ownership documents or otherwise clear the chain of title. This remedy applies where the trust instrument and other evidence show the trustmaker intended the transfer, but a deed, assignment, or recording requirement remained incomplete. The resulting order helps trustees manage trust assets, enables transactions, and removes uncertainty for banks, title companies, and beneficiaries.
Key elements in preparing a Heggstad petition include collecting the trust instrument, locating any draft deeds or signed transfer documents, obtaining death certificate and related estate records, and documenting the trustmaker’s intent through written or circumstantial evidence. The process involves drafting a clear petition, filing it in the appropriate California court, serving interested parties when required, and responding to any objections. Once a court issues an order, it is recorded with the county to reflect the trust as owner. Attention to detail and thorough documentation are important to establish the factual basis for relief and to prevent challenges.
Understanding the terminology helps parties communicate effectively with title companies, the court, and other stakeholders. Important concepts include constructive trust, nuncupative evidence of intent, recording standards, and forms of transfer such as grant deeds or quitclaim deeds. Knowing these terms allows trustees and beneficiaries to gather relevant evidence and anticipate procedural requirements. Clear definitions also aid in explaining the matter to family members and third parties so that the court record accurately reflects the trustmaker’s wishes and the historical actions taken to fund the trust.
A constructive trust is an equitable remedy the court may impose to prevent unjust enrichment when property was meant to belong to someone else but formal transfer did not occur. In the Heggstad context, a constructive trust concept supports the argument that the decedent intended the property for the trust and that formal recording errors should not defeat that intention. Courts may consider whether holding property outside the trust would unjustly benefit someone contrary to the decedent’s documented plans. Evidence of intent and fairness considerations often drive the court’s analysis when applying this doctrine.
Nuncupative evidence refers to oral statements or informal writings that, combined with other proof, may show the trustmaker’s intent to transfer property to the trust. While written documents carry more weight, courts will sometimes consider consistent oral statements or contemporaneous actions that demonstrate the deceased’s plan. This form of evidence is used to supplement written records when the trust instrument exists but recording steps were overlooked. Properly documented nuncupative evidence can strengthen a Heggstad petition by providing context that supports the decedent’s intent to fund the trust.
A grant deed and a quitclaim deed are common instruments used to transfer real property in California. A grant deed typically conveys title with certain assurances, while a quitclaim deed transfers whatever interest the grantor has without warranties. When funding a trust, a deed in the trustmaker’s name transferring property into the trustee’s name or into the trust is often required. Failure to record an appropriate deed can prompt a Heggstad petition to clarify ownership consistent with the trustmaker’s expressed intent and to remedy the missing recorded transfer.
The chain of title is the recorded sequence of documents that proves ownership of real property. A cloud on title occurs when the recorded chain does not reflect the trustmaker’s intended ownership, often because a deed into the trust was not recorded. A successful Heggstad petition results in a court order that can be recorded to correct or complete the chain of title, enabling lenders or purchasers to rely on clear title. Ensuring the recorder’s records align with the trust documents is a primary goal of the Heggstad process.
When property is not recorded in a trust, parties may consider a Heggstad petition, probate, or other corrective filings. A Heggstad petition is often quicker and more focused than full probate because it seeks a narrow remedy to recognize trust ownership for specific assets. Probate may be required when broader estate administration is necessary, for example when many assets lack designations or significant creditor claims exist. Alternative remedies may include quick successions or affidavits for small estates, but these options depend on asset values and circumstances. A careful review of the facts determines which path provides the most efficient and secure outcome.
A limited Heggstad petition can be appropriate when the trust document unambiguously indicates that the decedent intended specific property to be part of the trust and there are related documents that corroborate that intent. Examples include a signed trust naming the property, a draft deed, or contemporaneous notes showing intent to transfer. When the underlying legal ownership is not contested and supporting evidence is strong, a focused petition to correct title resolves the issue without broader estate administration. This path can reduce delay and legal expense compared with opening a full probate case.
A narrow Heggstad petition is often suitable when potential creditor claims are minimal and beneficiaries agree on the trustmaker’s intent. If there is little risk that creditors will assert claims or that beneficiaries will challenge the transfer, the court can act more quickly to issue an order clarifying title. In these situations, the focused petition conserves estate resources and provides a straightforward path to record the change in ownership. This approach helps families avoid prolonged proceedings and allows trustees to manage property according to the trust instrument.
A comprehensive legal approach is advisable when an estate has multiple assets, conflicting documentation, or complex beneficiary relationships that require coordinated resolution. If several properties, bank accounts, and retirement assets all show inconsistencies with the trust, or if title issues raise tax and creditor concerns, a more thorough legal strategy helps ensure all matters are addressed consistently. Coordinated filings, full inventorying of assets, and attention to statutory deadlines protect estate value and reduce the risk of fragmented outcomes that could lead to future disputes among beneficiaries or creditors.
When there is a realistic possibility of contested beneficiary claims or unknown creditors, a comprehensive approach helps protect estate assets and the trustee’s obligations. This may include opening a probate estate for formal notice to creditors, pursuing declaratory relief in multiple jurisdictions, or coordinating with financial institutions to freeze problematic transfers while matters are resolved. A full review of potential liabilities, deadlines for claims, and the applicable procedures creates a defensible record and reduces unexpected losses that could diminish what is ultimately available for distribution to beneficiaries.
A comprehensive approach to rectifying trust funding issues can prevent piecemeal resolutions that leave other problems unaddressed. By reviewing all estate documents, recording necessary deeds, and resolving potential disputes at once, trustees and families gain a clearer path to final distribution. This coordinated method reduces the risk that a title correction in one area will reveal additional deficiencies elsewhere. In Wheatland cases where properties and accounts intersect, addressing the full estate landscape helps maintain cohesion and ensures that the trustmaker’s broader intentions are honored across the estate.
Comprehensive handling can also streamline communications with title companies, banks, and other institutions by presenting a single cohesive plan and a complete court record when needed. Rather than returning to the courthouse multiple times, the trustee can resolve title issues, beneficiary notices, and administrative obligations together. This reduces repeated costs and shortens timeframes for distributing assets. Families often appreciate the clarity and reduced administrative burden that follows a well-planned, thorough approach to resolving funding and title matters after a trustmaker’s death.
One major benefit of a comprehensive resolution is obtaining clear title that allows property to be sold, refinanced, or transferred without surprise obstacles. A complete record of court orders, corrected deeds, and reconciled beneficiary interests simplifies dealings with lenders and buyers. Trustees can act confidently when the recorder’s files and supporting legal documents align. This reduces delays and additional costs associated with title objections or lender hesitancy, and it helps trustees carry out their duties efficiently while honoring the estate’s intended distributions.
A thorough legal approach lowers the chance that unresolved issues will trigger disputes later. By addressing incomplete transfers, creditor notices, and beneficiary communications proactively, trustees can create a durable record demonstrating good faith administration. This helps prevent parties from raising new objections after distributions have been made and provides courts with a clear factual foundation should any later challenge occur. The result is greater finality and protection for trustees and beneficiaries alike, reducing the prospect of repeated litigation over the same matters.
Before filing a petition, collect the trust instrument, any draft or recorded deeds, correspondence indicating intent to transfer, death certificate, and related financial records. Having a complete set of documents supports a clear petition and reduces requests for additional evidence. In many cases, well-organized documentation speeds up review by the court and the county recorder. Keep copies of all materials and create a timeline of relevant events showing when the trust was signed and what steps were taken toward transferring property. This preparation improves the chance of a smooth, timely resolution.
Before recording any court order, confirm with the county recorder and title companies what documentation they require to update the chain of title. Title companies may request certified copies of the order, specific acknowledgments, or additional affidavits. Understanding these procedural details in advance avoids rejections or delays at the recorder’s office and ensures that once the court grants relief, the paperwork can be recorded promptly. This coordination promotes efficient transfer of ownership and facilitates transactions involving the property.
A Heggstad petition is worth considering when a trustmaker clearly intended to fund a trust but missed formal steps to convey property. Instances include a signed trust that mentions specific real estate but lacks a recorded deed in the trust’s name, or when draft deeds exist but were never completed. Another reason is when beneficiaries or institutions request documented proof of trust ownership before proceeding with sales or transfers. Seeking this remedy helps ensure transactions are based on clear title and the trustmaker’s documented wishes are honored.
People also pursue a Heggstad petition when time-sensitive transactions, such as sales or refinance requests, require a recorded chain of title. Lenders and buyers often insist on unambiguous ownership before closing a sale or providing funds. Additionally, the petition can be useful when there is minor ambiguity in estate documents that would not merit full probate, or when avoiding probate reduces cost and delay. The remedy focuses on aligning recorded ownership with the trust while limiting additional estate administration when not necessary.
Common circumstances include discovering that a deed was never transferred into the trust, finding a deed in draft form, or learning that a title company refuses to insure trust ownership without a court order. Other triggers include beneficiaries needing a recorded statement for sale or refinance, or when successor trustees require a clear record to manage property. Often, the underlying cause is a gap between the trustmaker’s intent and the administrative steps needed to perfect title, and the petition provides a focused legal remedy to close that gap.
This situation arises when a trust was executed but the deed transferring real property into the trust was never recorded before the trustmaker’s death. Even though the trust instrument names the property, the county records do not reflect the transfer, creating an apparent discrepancy in ownership. A Heggstad petition seeks a judicial declaration that the decedent intended the property to be part of the trust and requests an order to correct the recorder’s files. Resolving this matter allows the trustee to manage or transfer property without lingering title concerns.
Sometimes draft deeds or partially completed forms are found among a trustmaker’s papers, which suggests an intent to transfer but lacks formal execution or recording. Such incomplete paperwork raises questions for title companies and beneficiaries about whether the transfer was effective. A Heggstad petition compiles the available documentation and asks the court to interpret the totality of evidence to honor the trustmaker’s intent. Successfully resolving these gaps prevents future disputes and clarifies the trustee’s authority over the asset.
Lenders and title companies may refuse to complete transactions or issue title insurance when the recorded deed does not match the trust records. This refusal can hinder sales, refinances, and estate administration. Filing a Heggstad petition often results in a court order that title companies will accept, enabling the recorder to update ownership accordingly. Addressing these concerns through the court and recording the resulting order resolves practical barriers and permits transactions to proceed with the assurance that the recorded title reflects the trustmaker’s intent.
Law Offices of Robert P. Bergman assists Wheatland residents with matters involving trust funding and Heggstad petitions. We provide guidance on gathering evidence, preparing the necessary court papers, and coordinating with the county recorder and title companies. Our role is to help trustees and beneficiaries understand procedural requirements, possible outcomes, and the practical steps needed to clear title. We focus on timely resolution tailored to the facts of each case so families can proceed with sales, refinancing, or trust administration without lingering uncertainty.
Clients rely on a careful and methodical approach when addressing title and trust funding issues. Our firm emphasizes thorough document review and clear, practical recommendations that reflect local court practices. For Heggstad matters, we build a detailed record to present to the court and recorder, explaining how the trustmaker’s actions and writings demonstrate intent to fund the trust. We aim to resolve title questions efficiently while protecting beneficiaries’ interests and maintaining transparent communication throughout the process.
We coordinate with county recorders, title companies, and trustees to ensure that any court order can be recorded and accepted for the intended transaction. This coordination minimizes the risk of procedural setbacks and helps trustees complete property transfers, sales, or refinances. Our focus includes preparing the petition, serving interested parties correctly, and addressing potential objections with careful legal arguments and supporting evidence. The goal is a practical outcome that aligns recorded ownership with the trustmaker’s documented wishes.
From initial assessment to recorded resolution, we guide clients through each step of the Heggstad process with attention to timelines and documentation. We help trustees balance the need for speed with the importance of building a persuasive record. By preparing clear court submissions and anticipating common requirements from title companies and courts, we aim to reduce delays and help trustees administer property in a manner consistent with the trust instrument and applicable California law.
Our process begins with an intake that identifies the property at issue and collects available documents, including the trust, deeds, and any draft transfers. We then assess the facts and recommend whether a focused Heggstad petition or a broader approach is appropriate. If a petition is advised, we prepare the required filings, propose a recordable form of order, and coordinate service on interested parties. Once the court issues an order, we ensure that certified copies are recorded and that title companies receive necessary documentation so the trustee can proceed with confidence.
We begin by reviewing the trust, any deeds, and surrounding evidence to determine whether a petition is likely to succeed. This phase assesses the trustmaker’s intent and compiles a list of required documents and potential interested parties. Our team also identifies any likely objections and prepares a timeline for filing and recording. The goal is to create a complete factual record that supports a clear petition and reduces the chance of delays after the filing.
Collecting all relevant records includes the trust instrument, any draft or recorded deeds, correspondence indicating intent, and the decedent’s death certificate. We also obtain public records showing current recorded ownership and any encumbrances on the property. Having these documents organized enables us to present a coherent narrative to the court and to anticipate recorder and title company requirements. Detailed preparation at this stage is key to moving the matter efficiently through the court process and into the recorder’s files.
We identify who must be served with the petition, such as beneficiaries, successors in interest, and potential creditors, and we determine which notice procedures the court requires. Proper notice helps prevent procedural challenges later and provides an opportunity for interested parties to respond. If parties agree, stipulations can shorten proceedings; if not, we prepare to address objections. Careful adherence to notice rules protects the order’s effectiveness when it is later recorded to clear title.
In this step we draft a concise petition that describes the property, the trust provisions, and the evidence supporting the trustmaker’s intended transfer. The petition includes proposed findings and a form order for the court to sign. We ensure filings conform to local court rules and include the necessary attachments and declarations. Clear presentation of facts and legal arguments helps the court understand the basis for the requested relief and enhances the likelihood of a prompt ruling that the recorder will accept for recording.
Drafting involves preparing the narrative of events, attaching the trust and any related documents, and drafting declarations from witnesses or those with knowledge of the deceased’s intent. These supporting declarations provide context and testimony about the trustmaker’s actions, which can be persuasive when formal transfer documents are lacking. The petition must be framed in a way that aligns legal authority with the factual record so the court can make the findings necessary to issue an order that will be accepted by the county recorder.
After filing the petition, we serve required parties and monitor the response period. If objections arise, we prepare legal responses and, if necessary, request hearings to resolve disputes. Our aim is to keep the process focused on clarifying ownership while addressing legitimate concerns. If parties reach agreement, we can submit stipulated orders to streamline the recordation process. Throughout, we maintain communication with the client and adjust the approach based on developments to protect the trust’s and beneficiaries’ interests.
Once the court grants the petition, we obtain certified copies of the order and prepare documents needed for recording with the county recorder. We confirm the recorder’s formatting requirements and coordinate the delivery of certified materials. After recording, we provide copies to title companies, lenders, and beneficiaries as needed so they can rely on the corrected chain of title. Recording completes the practical effect of the petition by aligning public records with the trustmaker’s intent and enabling trustees to transact with confidence.
Following the court’s ruling, we obtain certified or conformed copies of the order in the form required by the county recorder. We verify fees and recording formats, and ensure the order is indexed correctly in public records. Timely recording changes the public chain of title and helps lenders and buyers accept the trust as owner. We then distribute copies to relevant parties and update estate records to reflect the corrected ownership, allowing trustees to proceed with administration tasks or real estate transactions without delay.
After recording, we communicate with title companies and financial institutions to secure title insurance or to enable refinancing and sales. We provide the recorded order and related documents so institutions can update their records and proceed with transactions. This step often resolves outstanding holds on property activity and clarifies trustee authority. By coordinating evidence and the recorded order, we help trustees complete necessary transactions while maintaining a clear record for future reference.
A Heggstad petition is a court filing used in California to request that the court declare certain property to belong to a trust when the trustmaker intended to fund the trust but failed to complete all formal transfer steps. The petition presents the trust instrument, related documents, and declarations that demonstrate intent to place the property in the trust, and asks the court to issue an order that can be recorded to clarify title. It applies in situations where recorded documents do not match the trust despite clear evidence of intent. The remedy is narrower than full probate because it targets specific assets and seeks a declaratory order to correct public records. Courts consider the totality of evidence, including written documents and actions taken by the decedent, when evaluating a petition. If successful, the order provides a recorded basis for trustees to manage, sell, or refinance the property without further delay, and it improves the willingness of title companies and lenders to accept trust ownership.
Timing for a Heggstad petition varies based on the court’s calendar, whether there are objections, and how quickly parties are served. In straightforward matters with clear documentation and no opposition, a petition can move relatively quickly, often within a few months from filing to order. Where objections arise or additional evidence is required, the process can extend. Local court procedures and the need to prepare declarations or obtain certified documents also influence timing. Coordination with the county recorder and title companies after the order is issued adds additional steps. Once the court grants relief, recording the order and securing acceptance from title companies may take additional weeks. Early preparation and clear evidence of intent tend to shorten the overall timeline and reduce administrative delays in completing the process.
The most helpful evidence for a Heggstad petition includes the trust instrument itself, any draft or executed deeds, contemporaneous correspondence or notes showing the trustmaker’s intent, and actions demonstrating an intent to transfer such as preparing paperwork or instructing an agent. A death certificate and public records showing the current recorded ownership are also required. Declarations from individuals who observed the trustmaker’s actions can further corroborate intent and provide necessary context for the court. Consistency across documents strengthens the petition. When the trust document explicitly references particular property or when a draft deed is found alongside trust materials, those items form a persuasive factual basis. Courts weigh the totality of the record, so gathering a well-organized set of supporting materials increases the likelihood of a favorable ruling and a smoothly recorded order to clear title.
Title companies generally accept court orders that correct or clarify title, provided the order is properly certified and recorded in the county deed records. A well-prepared Heggstad order will include specific findings and a directive that the recorder can rely upon to update the chain of title. Title companies may have internal procedures for accepting such orders, and they may request certified copies or additional documentation, so advance coordination is helpful. If a title company initially hesitates, presenting the recorded order along with supporting filings and declarations often resolves concerns. Clear documentation and compliance with recording requirements increase the likelihood that title companies and lenders will proceed with transactions, such as sales and refinances, based on the corrected public record.
Yes, beneficiaries or other interested parties may object to a Heggstad petition if they dispute the trustmaker’s intent or claim competing interests in the property. The court provides an opportunity for interested parties to be heard, and objections can raise factual or legal issues that the petitioner must address. When objections arise, the court may request additional evidence, hold a hearing, or deny the petition if the challenger presents persuasive reasons why the transfer should not be recognized. Where disagreements exist, mediation or negotiated stipulations can sometimes resolve disputes without extended litigation. If parties can agree on facts or terms, they may present a stipulated order to the court, which can speed resolution and reduce costs. When objections persist, the petition process allows the court to evaluate competing claims and make a final determination based on the record.
Probate is not always necessary when property was not recorded into a trust. A Heggstad petition provides a focused alternative to probate by addressing specific assets that should have been transferred to a trust. When the issue is limited to a few properties and the trustmaker’s intent is well documented, the petition can produce a recorded order that resolves ownership without opening a full probate estate. This approach can save time and expense when appropriate. However, probate may still be required in cases where many assets lack proper designations, where substantial creditor issues exist, or where the factual record is insufficient to support a Heggstad petition. The choice between a petition and probate depends on the estate’s scope and the particular legal and factual issues present, and a careful assessment helps determine the best path forward.
The costs of filing a Heggstad petition depend on the complexity of the matter, court filing fees, and any necessary services such as title searches or certified copies. Legal fees vary with the amount of document review, drafting, and potential hearings required. When the facts are straightforward and parties do not object, costs are typically lower than a full probate administration. Additional expenses may arise if the court requires further evidence or if creditor notice procedures become necessary. Planning and thorough document preparation can help control costs. Early identification of required records and clear communication with interested parties often reduces the need for hearings and extended litigation. We provide clients with an overview of expected costs during the initial assessment so they can make an informed decision about whether to pursue a focused petition or a different remedy.
A Heggstad petition can address multiple properties if the trustmaker intended several assets to be part of the trust and the facts supporting those intentions are similar. Consolidating issues into a single petition may be efficient when the same trust and consistent documentary evidence apply to multiple parcels. However, adding numerous properties can increase complexity and may require more extensive evidence and service to interested parties, which could lengthen the process and raise costs. When multiple assets have different histories or potential disputes, separate petitions or alternative procedures may be advisable. We evaluate whether combining properties into a single petition serves the client’s goals and whether doing so will streamline or complicate the court process. The decision balances efficiency with the need to present a clear factual record for each asset at issue.
If the court denies a Heggstad petition, the petitioner can assess alternative remedies such as opening probate, seeking different equitable relief, or correcting deficiencies in the evidence and refiling if appropriate. A denial does not always end the matter, but it does require re-evaluation of the factual record and legal strategy. The court’s reasons for denial guide which steps to take next, whether through additional documentation, witness statements, or pursuing a different legal path to achieve the desired result. When a petition is denied, parties should review the court’s findings carefully to determine remedial options. In some cases, negotiation with interested parties or supplemental declaratory requests can address concerns. In others, formal probate may be necessary to provide the broader notice and administration that the court finds appropriate under the circumstances.
After a successful petition, trustees should prepare to record the court order promptly and ensure that certified copies meet the county recorder’s format requirements. Trustees should gather any related instruments, confirm payment of recording fees, and coordinate with title companies if a sale or refinance is pending. Maintaining organized records of all filed documents and ensuring distribution of recorded orders to interested parties helps prevent future disputes and supports trust administration. It is also wise to update estate records and provide copies of the recorded order to banks, lenders, and title insurers so they can proceed with transactions. Trustees should retain proof of recording and communicate next steps to beneficiaries so everyone understands the implications for property management and distribution. Swift and proper recording turns the court’s ruling into practical, usable title documentation.
Criminal Defense
Homicide Defense
Manslaughter
Assault and Battery
Assault with a Deadly Weapon
Battery Causing Great Bodily Injury
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence Protection Orders
Domestic Violence Restraining Order
Arson Defense
Weapons Charges
Illegal Firearm Possessions
Civil Harassment
Civil Harassment Restraining Orders
School Violence Restraining Orders
Violent Crimes Defense
Estate Planning Practice Areas